SB 45 — Internet gambling.

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 45 do?

The Gambling Control Act provides for the licensure of certain individuals and establishments that conduct controlled games, as defined, and for the regulation of these gambling activities by the California Gambling Control Commission. Existing law provides for the enforcement of those regulations by the Department of Justice. Any violation of these provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor, as specified. This bill would establish a framework to authorize intrastate Internet gambling, as specified. The bill would require the department to issue a request for proposals to enter into contracts with up to 3 hub operators, as defined, to provide lawful Internet gambling games to registered players in California for a period of 20 years, as specified. The bill would provide that it would be a misdemeanor for any person to offer or play any gambling game provided over the Internet that is not authorized by the state pursuant to this bill. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require a hub operator to remit an agreed-upon percentage, but no less than 10%, of its gross revenues to the Treasurer on a monthly basis. The bill would also create the Internet Gambling Fund which would be administered by the Controller subject to annual appropriation by the Legislature, and which would not be subject to the formulas established by statute directing expenditures from the General Fund, for appropriation by the Legislature to state agencies , as specified. Existing law provides that a statute that imposes a requirement that a state agency submit a periodic report to the Legislature is inoperative on a date 4 years after the date the first report is due. This bill would require the commission, notwithstanding that requirement, in consultation with the department, Treasurer, and Franchise Tax Board, to issue a report to the Legislature describing the state's efforts to meet the policy goals articulated in this bill within one year of the effective date of this bill and, annually, thereafter. The bill would also require the Bureau of State Audits, 3 years after the commencement date of any hub operations contract with the state, but no later than 4 years after that date, to issue a report to the Legislature detailing the bureau's implementation of this bill, as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Who sponsors SB 45?

SB 45 is sponsored by Wright.

What is the current status of SB 45?

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Where can I track SB 45?

Track SB 45 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.