Renewable energy resources: hydroelectric generation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1771 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1771.
You're tracking AB 1771
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1771 — Renewable energy resources: hydroelectric generation.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the California renewables portfolio standard program, which requires the Public Utilities Commission to implement annual procurement targets for the procurement of eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, for all retail sellers, as defined, to achieve the targets and goals of the program. The existing definition of an eligible renewable energy resource includes small hydroelectric generation facilities of 30 megawatts or less that meet specified criteria. This bill would revise the definition of an eligible renewable energy resource for the purposes of the California renewables portfolio standard program to include a hydroelectric generation facility of any size, as specified, and make conforming changes. These provisions would become operative 6 months after the date that a certain report is submitted by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to the Legislature.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/19/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 19, 2012
- Introduced 02/17/12 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2012
- AB1771 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (April 16).
-
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Valadao · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Valadao
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Nay |
| Dickinson | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Nay |
| Brownley | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 9 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 7% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Not Voting |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Not Voting |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1771 do?
- Existing law establishes the California renewables portfolio standard program, which requires the Public Utilities Commission to implement annual procurement targets for the procurement of eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, for all retail sellers, as defined, to achieve the targets and goals of the program. The existing definition of an eligible renewable energy resource includes small hydroelectric generation facilities of 30 megawatts or less that meet specified criteria. This bill would revise the definition of an eligible renewable energy resource for the purposes of the California renewables portfolio standard program to include a hydroelectric generation facility of any size, as specified, and make conforming changes. These provisions would become operative 6 months after the date that a certain report is submitted by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to the Legislature.
- Who sponsors AB 1771?
- AB 1771 is sponsored by Valadao.
- What is the current status of AB 1771?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1771?
- Track AB 1771 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1771
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1771
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →