Contempt: gang injunctions.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 281 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 281.
You're tracking AB 281
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 281 — Contempt: gang injunctions.
Last action — From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, subject to certain exceptions, provides that it is a misdemeanor for any person to commit various kinds of contempt of court, including, among other things, willful disobedience of the terms of any injunction that restrains the activities of a criminal street gang or any of its members, lawfully issued by a court, including an order pending trial. This bill would provide that a first violation of such an injunction would be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than 6 months, or by a fine not exceeding $1,000, or by both that imprisonment and fine. A 2nd violation occurring within 7 years of the first violation would be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than 9 months, or by a fine not exceeding $2,500, or by both that imprisonment and fine. A 3rd or subsequent violation occurring within 7 years of a prior violation would be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine not exceeding $5,000, or by both that imprisonment and fine. The bill would also provide that these penalties would apply unless a greater penalty is authorized by other provisions of law. By increasing the penalties for an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/06/11 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 06, 2011
- Amended 03/15/11 - Amended Assembly pdf March 15, 2011
- Introduced 02/08/11 - Introduced pdf February 08, 2011
- AB281 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
In committee: Set, final hearing. Failed passage.
-
In committee: Set second hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gorell · Primary
- Williams · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gorell
Co-sponsors (1)
- Williams
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 50% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 43% | 14% | 0% | 43% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 281 do?
- Existing law, subject to certain exceptions, provides that it is a misdemeanor for any person to commit various kinds of contempt of court, including, among other things, willful disobedience of the terms of any injunction that restrains the activities of a criminal street gang or any of its members, lawfully issued by a court, including an order pending trial. This bill would provide that a first violation of such an injunction would be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than 6 months, or by a fine not exceeding $1,000, or by both that imprisonment and fine. A 2nd violation occurring within 7 years of the first violation would be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than 9 months, or by a fine not exceeding $2,500, or by both that imprisonment and fine. A 3rd or subsequent violation occurring within 7 years of a prior violation would be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine not exceeding $5,000, or by both that imprisonment and fine. The bill would also provide that these penalties would apply unless a greater penalty is authorized by other provisions of law. By increasing the penalties for an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 281?
- AB 281 is sponsored by Gorell and Williams.
- What is the current status of AB 281?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 281?
- Track AB 281 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 281
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 281
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →