California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 1630 — Stanislaus County Superior Court: official court reporters.

Last action — From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Under existing law, the state has sole responsibility for the funding of court operations. Existing law authorizes a superior court to appoint as many official court reporters, and official court reporters pro tempore, as are deemed necessary. Those court reporters who are court employees are subject to the Trial Court Employment Protection and Governance Act, which authorizes each trial court to establish a salary range for each of its employee classifications. Existing law also prescribes the compensation of official court reporters and official court reporters pro tempore in Stanislaus County. This bill would repeal those provisions of law prescribing the compensation of official court reporters in Stanislaus County that have been rendered obsolete by that act. The bill would provide that the repeal of a specified provision shall not affect the calculation of compensation for retirement purposes for any official court reporter first hired by the Stanislaus County Superior Court before January 1, 2013.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

  2. In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.

  3. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  5. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  6. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  7. From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.

  8. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Olsen · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Olsen

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass.

Failed 3 Yea · 6 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2601
Republican 1000
Total 3601
% of votes cast 30%60%0%10%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Yea
Feuer — Nay
Atkins — Nay
Huber — Not Voting
Dickinson — Nay
Monning — Nay
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1630 do?
Under existing law, the state has sole responsibility for the funding of court operations. Existing law authorizes a superior court to appoint as many official court reporters, and official court reporters pro tempore, as are deemed necessary. Those court reporters who are court employees are subject to the Trial Court Employment Protection and Governance Act, which authorizes each trial court to establish a salary range for each of its employee classifications. Existing law also prescribes the compensation of official court reporters and official court reporters pro tempore in Stanislaus County. This bill would repeal those provisions of law prescribing the compensation of official court reporters in Stanislaus County that have been rendered obsolete by that act. The bill would provide that the repeal of a specified provision shall not affect the calculation of compensation for retirement purposes for any official court reporter first hired by the Stanislaus County Superior Court before January 1, 2013.
Who sponsors AB 1630?
AB 1630 is sponsored by Olsen.
What is the current status of AB 1630?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1630?
Track AB 1630 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1630

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1630

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →