Department of Forestry and Fire Protection: employment: criminal background checks.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 163 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 163.
You're tracking AB 163
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 163 — Department of Forestry and Fire Protection: employment: criminal background checks.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to be responsible for the fire protection, fire prevention, maintenance, and enhancement of the state's forest, range, and brushland resources, contract fire protection, associated emergency services, and assistance in civil disasters and other nonfire emergencies. This bill would require the department to conduct a state and federal level criminal offender record information search through the Department of Justice prior to hiring an applicant, as defined, for a position with the department or the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, with exceptions. The bill would require the Department of Justice to provide the information electronically, and require the department to request the Department of Justice to provide subsequent arrest notification services. This bill would require the department to make and enforce those regulations necessary and proper for the implementation and maintenance of the requirements of these provisions. The bill would require the department to implement the requirements of these provisions utilizing any existing funds that are available to the department and would prohibit the department from assessing a fee on an applicant for purposes of conducting a background check.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 01/19/11 - Introduced Current pdf January 19, 2011
- AB163 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Jeffries · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jeffries
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 44% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Nay |
| Dickinson | — | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 163 do?
- Existing law requires the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to be responsible for the fire protection, fire prevention, maintenance, and enhancement of the state's forest, range, and brushland resources, contract fire protection, associated emergency services, and assistance in civil disasters and other nonfire emergencies. This bill would require the department to conduct a state and federal level criminal offender record information search through the Department of Justice prior to hiring an applicant, as defined, for a position with the department or the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, with exceptions. The bill would require the Department of Justice to provide the information electronically, and require the department to request the Department of Justice to provide subsequent arrest notification services. This bill would require the department to make and enforce those regulations necessary and proper for the implementation and maintenance of the requirements of these provisions. The bill would require the department to implement the requirements of these provisions utilizing any existing funds that are available to the department and would prohibit the department from assessing a fee on an applicant for purposes of conducting a background check.
- Who sponsors AB 163?
- AB 163 is sponsored by Jeffries.
- What is the current status of AB 163?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 163?
- Track AB 163 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 163
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 163
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →