California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 1008 — Vehicles: automated traffic enforcement systems.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the limit line, intersection, or other places where a driver is required to stop to be equipped with an automated traffic enforcement system, as defined, if the system meets certain requirements. Existing law authorizes a governmental agency to contract out the operation of the system under certain circumstances, except for specified activities, that include, among other things, establishing guidelines for selection of location. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2012, prohibit a local governmental agency from installing an automated traffic enforcement system. The bill would authorize a local governmental agency that is operating an automatic traffic enforcement system on or before that date to continue to do so after that date only if the agency begins conducting a traffic safety study on or before February 28, 2012, at each intersection where a system is in use to determine whether the use of the system resulted in a reduction in the number of traffic accidents at that intersection. The bill would require the local governmental agency to terminate the use of an automated traffic enforcement system at an intersection no later than January 1, 2015, if the traffic safety study shows that the use of the system did not reduce the number of traffic accidents that occurred at that intersection.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  5. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  6. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  7. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  8. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Cook · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Cook

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 1 Yea · 4 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 1404
Total 1404
% of votes cast 11%44%0%44%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Nay
Campos — Nay
Hueso — Nay
Knight — Not Voting
Smyth — Not Voting
Alejo — Nay
Bradford — Not Voting
Norby — Yea
Davis — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1008 do?
Existing law authorizes the limit line, intersection, or other places where a driver is required to stop to be equipped with an automated traffic enforcement system, as defined, if the system meets certain requirements. Existing law authorizes a governmental agency to contract out the operation of the system under certain circumstances, except for specified activities, that include, among other things, establishing guidelines for selection of location. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2012, prohibit a local governmental agency from installing an automated traffic enforcement system. The bill would authorize a local governmental agency that is operating an automatic traffic enforcement system on or before that date to continue to do so after that date only if the agency begins conducting a traffic safety study on or before February 28, 2012, at each intersection where a system is in use to determine whether the use of the system resulted in a reduction in the number of traffic accidents at that intersection. The bill would require the local governmental agency to terminate the use of an automated traffic enforcement system at an intersection no later than January 1, 2015, if the traffic safety study shows that the use of the system did not reduce the number of traffic accidents that occurred at that intersection.
Who sponsors AB 1008?
AB 1008 is sponsored by Cook.
What is the current status of AB 1008?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1008?
Track AB 1008 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1008

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1008

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →