Foster youth: placement.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1697 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1697.
You're tracking AB 1697
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1697 — Foster youth: placement.
Last action — In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to implement a statewide Child Welfare Services Case Management System to protect children and effectively administer and evaluate the state's child welfare services and foster care programs. Existing law requires the department to provide technical assistance to encourage and facilitate a county placement agency's evaluation of placement needs. Existing law requires a county placement agency specifically to examine placements that are out of county, determine the reason the placement was necessary, and identify the additional placement resources and programs that need to be developed and available to allow a child to remain within the county and as close as possible to his or her home. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services to designate a separate, consistent data entry field in the Child Welfare Services Case Management System for a county welfare agency to record information regarding the reasons for the placement of a child when the child is placed with a foster family agency or group home. It would also require a county welfare agency to file this information with the system when this placement is made. By increasing the duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/29/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 29, 2012
- Introduced 02/15/12 - Introduced pdf February 15, 2012
- AB1697 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Perea · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Perea
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1697 do?
- Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to implement a statewide Child Welfare Services Case Management System to protect children and effectively administer and evaluate the state's child welfare services and foster care programs. Existing law requires the department to provide technical assistance to encourage and facilitate a county placement agency's evaluation of placement needs. Existing law requires a county placement agency specifically to examine placements that are out of county, determine the reason the placement was necessary, and identify the additional placement resources and programs that need to be developed and available to allow a child to remain within the county and as close as possible to his or her home. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services to designate a separate, consistent data entry field in the Child Welfare Services Case Management System for a county welfare agency to record information regarding the reasons for the placement of a child when the child is placed with a foster family agency or group home. It would also require a county welfare agency to file this information with the system when this placement is made. By increasing the duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1697?
- AB 1697 is sponsored by Perea.
- What is the current status of AB 1697?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1697?
- Track AB 1697 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1697
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1697
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →