AB 1017 — Marijuana cultivation: reduced penalty.
Last action — Died on third reading file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires that every person who plants, cultivates, harvests, dries, or processes any marijuana, or any part thereof, except as otherwise provided by law, be punished by imprisonment in the state prison. This bill would make that crime punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for a period of not more than one year or by imprisonment in the state prison. By changing the penalty for this crime to authorize imprisonment in a county jail, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced Current pdf February 18, 2011
- AB1017 View text html
Action History
-
Died on third reading file.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From inactive file.
-
Notice of intention to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Ammiano.
-
Reconsideration granted. (Page 1782.)
-
Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Ammiano.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 24. Noes 36. Page 1750.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 7.) (May 18).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 3.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Ammiano · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Ammiano
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 34 | 0 | 19 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 36 | 0 | 20 |
| % of votes cast | 30% | 45% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Gordon | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Not Voting |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Nay |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 41% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1017 do?
- Existing law requires that every person who plants, cultivates, harvests, dries, or processes any marijuana, or any part thereof, except as otherwise provided by law, be punished by imprisonment in the state prison. This bill would make that crime punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for a period of not more than one year or by imprisonment in the state prison. By changing the penalty for this crime to authorize imprisonment in a county jail, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1017?
- AB 1017 is sponsored by Ammiano.
- What is the current status of AB 1017?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1017?
- Track AB 1017 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1017
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1017
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →