Internet poker.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 40 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 40.
You're tracking SB 40
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 40 — Internet poker.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Gambling Control Act provides for the licensure of certain individuals and establishments that conduct controlled games, as defined, and for the regulation of these gambling activities by the California Gambling Control Commission. Existing law provides for the enforcement of those regulations by the Department of Justice. Any violation of these provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor, as specified. This bill would establish a framework to authorize intrastate Internet poker, as specified. The bill would require the commission to adopt emergency regulations, in consultation with the department, providing for the issuance of licenses to operate intrastate Internet poker Web sites and governing the intrastate play of poker games on the Internet. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for any person or entity to offer or participate in any form of illegal Internet gambling, as defined, or to knowingly process any financial transaction arising out of participation in illegal Internet gambling. The bill would authorize the seizure of any money or property used in or derived from illegal Internet gambling, as specified, and would provide for any money or property that has been seized to be forfeited to the Internet Gambling Fund, as established by this bill. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would permit these Internet Web sites to conduct a live online nonbanked, nonpercentage version of the card game poker within the borders of the State of California under the same rules, and with the same manner of compensation, as apply to poker games currently conducted in licensed gambling establishments and tribal class II gaming facilities. The bill would require the commission to issue licenses to own and operate intrastate Internet poker Web sites to eligible entities, as specified. The bill would authorize the commission to assess fees on licensed entities in an amount reasonably necessary to reimburse the commission for its costs in implementing and administering these provisions, including a registration fee. The bill also would require a licensed entity to pay a license fee equal to 10% of the fees collected by the licensed entity from players participating in poker games conducted on its Internet Web site. The bill would provide for all fees to be remitted to the Internet Gambling Fund, as established by this bill and administered by the Controller, subject to annual appropriation by the Legislature. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 07/06/11 - Amended Senate Current pdf July 06, 2011
- Amended 05/16/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 16, 2011
- Amended 03/31/11 - Amended Senate pdf March 31, 2011
- Introduced 12/06/10 - Introduced pdf December 06, 2010
- SB40 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 6.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Correa · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Correa
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 40 do?
- The Gambling Control Act provides for the licensure of certain individuals and establishments that conduct controlled games, as defined, and for the regulation of these gambling activities by the California Gambling Control Commission. Existing law provides for the enforcement of those regulations by the Department of Justice. Any violation of these provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor, as specified. This bill would establish a framework to authorize intrastate Internet poker, as specified. The bill would require the commission to adopt emergency regulations, in consultation with the department, providing for the issuance of licenses to operate intrastate Internet poker Web sites and governing the intrastate play of poker games on the Internet. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for any person or entity to offer or participate in any form of illegal Internet gambling, as defined, or to knowingly process any financial transaction arising out of participation in illegal Internet gambling. The bill would authorize the seizure of any money or property used in or derived from illegal Internet gambling, as specified, and would provide for any money or property that has been seized to be forfeited to the Internet Gambling Fund, as established by this bill. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would permit these Internet Web sites to conduct a live online nonbanked, nonpercentage version of the card game poker within the borders of the State of California under the same rules, and with the same manner of compensation, as apply to poker games currently conducted in licensed gambling establishments and tribal class II gaming facilities. The bill would require the commission to issue licenses to own and operate intrastate Internet poker Web sites to eligible entities, as specified. The bill would authorize the commission to assess fees on licensed entities in an amount reasonably necessary to reimburse the commission for its costs in implementing and administering these provisions, including a registration fee. The bill also would require a licensed entity to pay a license fee equal to 10% of the fees collected by the licensed entity from players participating in poker games conducted on its Internet Web site. The bill would provide for all fees to be remitted to the Internet Gambling Fund, as established by this bill and administered by the Controller, subject to annual appropriation by the Legislature. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 40?
- SB 40 is sponsored by Correa.
- What is the current status of SB 40?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 40?
- Track SB 40 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 40
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 40
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →