AB 88 — Food labeling: genetically engineered food.
Last action — From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law makes it unlawful to manufacture, sell, deliver, hold, or offer for sale, any food that is misbranded. Food is misbranded if its labeling does not conform to specified federal labeling requirements regarding nutrition, nutrient content or health claims, and food allergens. Violation of this law is a misdemeanor. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to require the labeling of all genetically engineered salmon entering and sold within the state. This bill would provide that food is misbranded if the food is a genetically engineered fish or fish product, as defined, and its labeling does not conspicuously identify the fish or fish product as genetically engineered. This bill would make related findings. By changing the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/21/11 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 21, 2011
- Introduced 01/06/11 - Introduced pdf January 06, 2011
- AB88 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 6.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 6.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Ammiano · Cosponsor
- Chesbro · Cosponsor
- Huffman · Primary
- Monning · Cosponsor
- Travis Allen · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Huffman
Co-sponsors (4)
- Ammiano
- Chesbro
- Monning
- Travis Allen
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 41% | 53% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 35% | 53% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 10 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 32% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 9 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 47% | 37% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Nay |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 88 do?
- The Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law makes it unlawful to manufacture, sell, deliver, hold, or offer for sale, any food that is misbranded. Food is misbranded if its labeling does not conform to specified federal labeling requirements regarding nutrition, nutrient content or health claims, and food allergens. Violation of this law is a misdemeanor. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to require the labeling of all genetically engineered salmon entering and sold within the state. This bill would provide that food is misbranded if the food is a genetically engineered fish or fish product, as defined, and its labeling does not conspicuously identify the fish or fish product as genetically engineered. This bill would make related findings. By changing the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 88?
- AB 88 is sponsored by Ammiano, Chesbro, Huffman, Monning, and Travis Allen.
- What is the current status of AB 88?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 88?
- Track AB 88 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 88
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 88
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →