California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 2008 — Education finance: revenue limits.

Last action — In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to determine a revenue limit for each school district in the county by, in part, calculating a base revenue limit for a fiscal year by adding a specified inflation adjustment, specified equalization adjustment, and specified add-ons to the base revenue limit for the prior fiscal year. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the 2011–12 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, to compute an add-on for each school district by adding a specified inflation adjustment to the amount of the add-on computed in the 2010–11 fiscal year, which is based, in part, on a specified adjustment. This bill would instead require the Superintendent, for the 2011–12 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, to compute the add-on for each school district in a different manner by, among other things, multiplying the sum of 1.0 plus the percentage change determined pursuant to a specified provision. (2) Existing law requires the Superintendent, for the 2010–11 fiscal year, to compute an adjustment for each school district by dividing each school district's 2007–08 fiscal year average daily attendance into the sum of funding for Meals for Needy Pupils programs and funding for incentives to increase beginning teachers' salaries received by the school district for the 2007–08 fiscal year pursuant to specified provisions. This bill would instead require the Superintendent, for the 2014–15 fiscal year, to compute an adjustment for each school district by dividing each school district's 2009–10 fiscal year average daily attendance into funding for Meals for Needy Pupils programs received by the school district for the 2009–10 fiscal year. (3) A former provision, which became inoperative on July 1, 2010, and was repealed on January 1, 2011, authorized an adjustment of the revenue limit of a school district to reflect funding for Meals for Needy Pupils programs. This bill would reenact this authorization, which would be operative until July 1, 2014.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.

  2. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  3. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  5. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  6. Referred to Com. on ED.

  7. From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.

  8. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Bradford · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Bradford

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

finance education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2008 do?
(1) Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to determine a revenue limit for each school district in the county by, in part, calculating a base revenue limit for a fiscal year by adding a specified inflation adjustment, specified equalization adjustment, and specified add-ons to the base revenue limit for the prior fiscal year. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the 2011–12 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, to compute an add-on for each school district by adding a specified inflation adjustment to the amount of the add-on computed in the 2010–11 fiscal year, which is based, in part, on a specified adjustment. This bill would instead require the Superintendent, for the 2011–12 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, to compute the add-on for each school district in a different manner by, among other things, multiplying the sum of 1.0 plus the percentage change determined pursuant to a specified provision. (2) Existing law requires the Superintendent, for the 2010–11 fiscal year, to compute an adjustment for each school district by dividing each school district's 2007–08 fiscal year average daily attendance into the sum of funding for Meals for Needy Pupils programs and funding for incentives to increase beginning teachers' salaries received by the school district for the 2007–08 fiscal year pursuant to specified provisions. This bill would instead require the Superintendent, for the 2014–15 fiscal year, to compute an adjustment for each school district by dividing each school district's 2009–10 fiscal year average daily attendance into funding for Meals for Needy Pupils programs received by the school district for the 2009–10 fiscal year. (3) A former provision, which became inoperative on July 1, 2010, and was repealed on January 1, 2011, authorized an adjustment of the revenue limit of a school district to reflect funding for Meals for Needy Pupils programs. This bill would reenact this authorization, which would be operative until July 1, 2014.
Who sponsors AB 2008?
AB 2008 is sponsored by Bradford.
What is the current status of AB 2008?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2008?
Track AB 2008 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2008

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2008

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →