AB 385 — High-speed rail.
Last action — From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century, approved by the voters as Proposition 1A at the November 4, 2008, general election, provides for the issuance of $9.95 billion in general obligation bonds for high-speed rail and related purposes. Existing law, the California High-Speed Rail Act, creates the High-Speed Rail Authority to develop and implement a high-speed train system in the state, with specified powers and duties. Existing law requires the authority to approve and submit to the Director of Finance, a specified peer review group, the transportation policy committees and fiscal committees of the Legislature, a detailed funding plan for that corridor or a usable segment thereof of the high-speed train system. Existing law requires the funding plan to include certain information and meet specified requirements. This bill would require the authority to approve an investment grade analysis, to be prepared by the State Auditor, and to submit that investment grade analysis to those same entities. The bill would require that investment grade analysis to include certain information and meet specified requirements.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 25, 2011
- Amended 03/25/11 - Amended Assembly pdf March 25, 2011
- Introduced 02/14/11 - Introduced pdf February 14, 2011
- AB385 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
-
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Jones · Cosponsor
- Donnelly · Cosponsor
- Shannon Grove · Cosponsor
- Hagman · Cosponsor
- Harkey · Primary
- Logue · Cosponsor
- Mansoor · Cosponsor
- Nielsen · Cosponsor
- Wagner · Cosponsor
- La Malfa · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Harkey
Co-sponsors (9)
- Jones
- Donnelly
- Grove, Shannon Republican
- Hagman
- Logue
- Mansoor
- Nielsen
- Wagner
- La Malfa
Not signed on (112)
112 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 112 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 5 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 36% | 50% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Furutani | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 385 do?
- Existing law, the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century, approved by the voters as Proposition 1A at the November 4, 2008, general election, provides for the issuance of $9.95 billion in general obligation bonds for high-speed rail and related purposes. Existing law, the California High-Speed Rail Act, creates the High-Speed Rail Authority to develop and implement a high-speed train system in the state, with specified powers and duties. Existing law requires the authority to approve and submit to the Director of Finance, a specified peer review group, the transportation policy committees and fiscal committees of the Legislature, a detailed funding plan for that corridor or a usable segment thereof of the high-speed train system. Existing law requires the funding plan to include certain information and meet specified requirements. This bill would require the authority to approve an investment grade analysis, to be prepared by the State Auditor, and to submit that investment grade analysis to those same entities. The bill would require that investment grade analysis to include certain information and meet specified requirements.
- Who sponsors AB 385?
- AB 385 is sponsored by Jones, Donnelly, Grove, Shannon (Republican), Hagman, Harkey, Logue, Mansoor, Nielsen, Wagner, and La Malfa.
- What is the current status of AB 385?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 385?
- Track AB 385 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 385
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 385
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →