Benefit corporations.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 361 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 361.
You're tracking AB 361
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 361 — Benefit corporations.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 728, Statutes of 2011.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the General Corporation Law, authorizes and regulates the formation and governance of general corporations. The Nonprofit Corporation Law authorizes the formation and governance of nonprofit public benefit corporations, nonprofit mutual benefit corporations, and nonprofit religious corporations, and specifies the respective purposes for which those corporations may lawfully be formed. Existing law specifies the duties of corporate directors and the rights of shareholders. Existing law does not provide for the formation and governance of benefit corporations. This bill would authorize and regulate the formation and governance of a new form of corporate entity known as a benefit corporation. The bill would also permit an existing corporation to become a benefit corporation by amendment to its articles of incorporation, as specified, adopted by at least a minimum status vote, as defined, and would permit a corporation to become a benefit corporation through a merger, reorganization, or conversion, or domestic other business entity, as specified. This bill would define "benefit corporation" to mean a corporation that has been organized under the General Corporation Law and has elected to become subject to the provisions of the bill, as specified. The bill would provide that a benefit corporation may be formed for the purpose of creating general public benefit, defined as a material positive impact on society and the environment, taken as a whole, as assessed against a 3rd-party standard, as defined, that satisfies certain requirements. The bill would also provide that a benefit corporation may identify one or more specific public benefits, as defined, as an additional purpose of the corporation, including, without limitation, providing low-income or underserved individuals or communities with beneficial products or services, promoting economic opportunity for individuals or communities beyond the creation of jobs in the ordinary course of business, preserving the environment, and improving human health. This bill would require directors to consider the impacts of any action or proposed action upon specified considerations, including, among others, the shareholders and employees, and of customers who are beneficiaries of the general or specific public benefit purposes, and the environment, and would allow directors to consider the impacts of those actions on, among other things, the resources, intent, and conduct of any person seeking to acquire control of the benefit corporation. This bill would require the board of directors to prepare a specified statement relating to the public benefit purposes of the corporation. The bill would require the benefit corporation to prepare an annual benefit report to include, among other things, a statement indicating whether, in the board's opinion, the benefit corporation failed to pursue its general public benefit and any specific public benefit, a description of the ways in which the benefit corporation pursued those benefits, the extent to which those benefits were created, and the process and rationale for selecting the 3rd-party standard used to prepare the benefit reports, and would require the benefit corporation to file with the Secretary of State a copy of the benefit report together with a filing fee in a specified amount to cover the reasonable regulatory costs associated with maintaining those filings. This bill would include provisions governing the fiduciary duty and liability of an officer or director of a benefit corporation. The bill would provide that the duties of a director or officer, and the general, and any specific, public benefit purpose of a benefit corporation, may be enforced only in a benefit enforcement proceeding, as defined, that would be permitted to be commenced or maintained only as specified.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/09/11 - Chaptered Current pdf October 09, 2011
- Enrolled 08/30/11 - Enrolled pdf August 30, 2011
- Amended 07/12/11 - Amended Senate pdf July 12, 2011
- Amended 05/19/11 - Amended Assembly pdf May 19, 2011
- Amended 05/11/11 - Amended Assembly pdf May 11, 2011
- Amended 04/27/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 27, 2011
- Amended 03/14/11 - Amended Assembly pdf March 14, 2011
- Introduced 02/14/11 - Introduced pdf February 14, 2011
- AB361 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 728, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 57. Noes 17. Page 2647.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 7. Page 2008.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (July 5).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 17. Page 1560.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 18).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (May 3).
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Blumenfield · Cosponsor
- Dickinson · Cosponsor
- Hancock · Cosponsor
- Huffman · Primary
- Leno · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Huffman
Co-sponsors (4)
- Blumenfield
- Dickinson
- Hancock
- Leno
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 56 | 15 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 17 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 21% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Not Voting |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 23 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 18% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 57 | 16 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 17 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 21% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 20% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 361 do?
- Existing law, the General Corporation Law, authorizes and regulates the formation and governance of general corporations. The Nonprofit Corporation Law authorizes the formation and governance of nonprofit public benefit corporations, nonprofit mutual benefit corporations, and nonprofit religious corporations, and specifies the respective purposes for which those corporations may lawfully be formed. Existing law specifies the duties of corporate directors and the rights of shareholders. Existing law does not provide for the formation and governance of benefit corporations. This bill would authorize and regulate the formation and governance of a new form of corporate entity known as a benefit corporation. The bill would also permit an existing corporation to become a benefit corporation by amendment to its articles of incorporation, as specified, adopted by at least a minimum status vote, as defined, and would permit a corporation to become a benefit corporation through a merger, reorganization, or conversion, or domestic other business entity, as specified. This bill would define "benefit corporation" to mean a corporation that has been organized under the General Corporation Law and has elected to become subject to the provisions of the bill, as specified. The bill would provide that a benefit corporation may be formed for the purpose of creating general public benefit, defined as a material positive impact on society and the environment, taken as a whole, as assessed against a 3rd-party standard, as defined, that satisfies certain requirements. The bill would also provide that a benefit corporation may identify one or more specific public benefits, as defined, as an additional purpose of the corporation, including, without limitation, providing low-income or underserved individuals or communities with beneficial products or services, promoting economic opportunity for individuals or communities beyond the creation of jobs in the ordinary course of business, preserving the environment, and improving human health. This bill would require directors to consider the impacts of any action or proposed action upon specified considerations, including, among others, the shareholders and employees, and of customers who are beneficiaries of the general or specific public benefit purposes, and the environment, and would allow directors to consider the impacts of those actions on, among other things, the resources, intent, and conduct of any person seeking to acquire control of the benefit corporation. This bill would require the board of directors to prepare a specified statement relating to the public benefit purposes of the corporation. The bill would require the benefit corporation to prepare an annual benefit report to include, among other things, a statement indicating whether, in the board's opinion, the benefit corporation failed to pursue its general public benefit and any specific public benefit, a description of the ways in which the benefit corporation pursued those benefits, the extent to which those benefits were created, and the process and rationale for selecting the 3rd-party standard used to prepare the benefit reports, and would require the benefit corporation to file with the Secretary of State a copy of the benefit report together with a filing fee in a specified amount to cover the reasonable regulatory costs associated with maintaining those filings. This bill would include provisions governing the fiduciary duty and liability of an officer or director of a benefit corporation. The bill would provide that the duties of a director or officer, and the general, and any specific, public benefit purpose of a benefit corporation, may be enforced only in a benefit enforcement proceeding, as defined, that would be permitted to be commenced or maintained only as specified.
- Who sponsors AB 361?
- AB 361 is sponsored by Blumenfield, Dickinson, Hancock, Huffman, and Leno.
- What is the current status of AB 361?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 361?
- Track AB 361 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 361
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 361
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →