AB 1015 — Child welfare services: California Child and Family Service Review System.
Last action — From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services oversees the administration of county public social services, including child welfare services. Existing law requires the department to establish the California Child and Family Service Review System, in order to review all county child welfare systems. Existing law requires the department to report to the Assembly and Senate Budget Committees and appropriate legislative policy committees regarding the department's progress relating to federal and state child and family service reviews. This bill would, in relation to these reviews, require each county to consult with specified stakeholders in developing the county self-assessments and county improvement plans, or any subsequent county self-assessments, as specified. This bill would also require the county improvement plans to include a separately titled provision that lists and provides the rationale for proposed operational improvements that may be implemented at a cost savings to the county or within existing resources. By increasing duties of county officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/29/11 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 29, 2011
- Amended 06/20/11 - Amended Senate pdf June 20, 2011
- Amended 04/28/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 28, 2011
- Amended 04/14/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 14, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- AB1015 View text html
Action History
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 3.) (June 14).
-
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 25. Page 1475.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 11).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 26).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Lisa Calderon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Calderon, Lisa Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 23 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 25 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 31% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Not Voting |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1015 do?
- Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services oversees the administration of county public social services, including child welfare services. Existing law requires the department to establish the California Child and Family Service Review System, in order to review all county child welfare systems. Existing law requires the department to report to the Assembly and Senate Budget Committees and appropriate legislative policy committees regarding the department's progress relating to federal and state child and family service reviews. This bill would, in relation to these reviews, require each county to consult with specified stakeholders in developing the county self-assessments and county improvement plans, or any subsequent county self-assessments, as specified. This bill would also require the county improvement plans to include a separately titled provision that lists and provides the rationale for proposed operational improvements that may be implemented at a cost savings to the county or within existing resources. By increasing duties of county officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1015?
- AB 1015 is sponsored by Calderon, Lisa (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 1015?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1015?
- Track AB 1015 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1015
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1015
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →