California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 74 — Public event action plans and cooperative agreements for agricultural inspector services.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 666, Statutes of 2011.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 21, 2010. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law generally authorizes state agencies, including district agricultural associations, to allow private individuals or corporations to hold events on state property. This bill would require any state agency that seeks to hold an event with an expected attendance level over a specified amount on property that is either owned or operated by a state agency to, prior to the event, conduct a threat assessment that addresses specified topics. This bill would also require that if the state agency determines, based on the facts presented to it in the assessment, that there is a strong probability that loss of life or harm to the participants could occur, then the state agency must require the promoter to prepare an event action plan that includes specified information. This bill would also require the state agency to approve the event action plan before the promoter may hold the event. This bill would authorize the state agency to charge the promoter a fee that does not exceed the reasonable costs to the state agency to prepare the threat assessment, or to review the event action plan. This bill would exempt certain events from these requirements, including an annual fair within the network of California fairs if the primary purpose of the event is to exhibit or promote the state's agriculture, livestock, or industrial or natural resources through exhibits, vendors, or other educational programming. Prior law, which was repealed on July 26, 2011, prohibited the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, for the 2006–07 fiscal year, from entering into a cooperative agreement with the County of Los Angeles for agricultural inspector services if the agreement required that the county provide year-round services unless not less than 66% of the agricultural inspectors not afforded protections as permanent employees employed by the county providing year-round services under the cooperative agreement were afforded protections as permanent employees under the county's civil service or other personnel system. This bill would enact a similar provision and make it operative indefinitely.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 666, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 66. Noes 13. Page 3125.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 22. Noes 16. Page 2396.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.

  11. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. Withdrawn from committee.

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  14. Referred to Coms. on G.O. and PUB. S.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1567.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  18. From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 18).

  19. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Read second time and amended.

  23. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 27).

  24. Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.

  25. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.

  26. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on AGRI. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 31). Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.

  27. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  28. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  29. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  30. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  31. Read first time.

  32. From printer. May be heard in committee January 21.

  33. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Ma · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Ma

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 74 MA Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 66 Yea · 13 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 641201
Republican 1100
Democratic 1000
Total 661301
% of votes cast 83%16%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Butler — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Conway — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Fong — Yea
Cook — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hill — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Huber — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Beall — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Knight — Yea
Logue — Nay
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Norby — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Silva — Nay
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB74 Ma By Rubio

Passed 22 Yea · 16 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201502
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 221602
% of votes cast 55%40%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Evans — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Harman — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Huff — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Runner — Nay
Simitian — Not Voting
Walters — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Public Safety.

Passed 9 Yea · 1 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7102
Republican 1000
Democratic 1001
Total 9103
% of votes cast 69%8%0%23%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
De León — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Wright — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Evans — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

AB 74 MA Consent Calendar Second Day

Passed 75 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 73004
Republican 1001
Democratic 1000
Total 75005
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Fong — Yea
Carter — Yea
Allen — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Conway — Yea
Huber — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Cook — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Campos — Not Voting
Cedillo — Not Voting
Davis — Not Voting
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass, to Consent Calendar.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Lara — Yea
Davis — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Be referred to Committee on Agriculture.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9002
Total 9002
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Butler — Yea
Carter — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Williams — Yea
Knight — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Not Voting
Davis — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety labor agriculture
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 74 do?
Existing law generally authorizes state agencies, including district agricultural associations, to allow private individuals or corporations to hold events on state property. This bill would require any state agency that seeks to hold an event with an expected attendance level over a specified amount on property that is either owned or operated by a state agency to, prior to the event, conduct a threat assessment that addresses specified topics. This bill would also require that if the state agency determines, based on the facts presented to it in the assessment, that there is a strong probability that loss of life or harm to the participants could occur, then the state agency must require the promoter to prepare an event action plan that includes specified information. This bill would also require the state agency to approve the event action plan before the promoter may hold the event. This bill would authorize the state agency to charge the promoter a fee that does not exceed the reasonable costs to the state agency to prepare the threat assessment, or to review the event action plan. This bill would exempt certain events from these requirements, including an annual fair within the network of California fairs if the primary purpose of the event is to exhibit or promote the state's agriculture, livestock, or industrial or natural resources through exhibits, vendors, or other educational programming. Prior law, which was repealed on July 26, 2011, prohibited the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, for the 2006–07 fiscal year, from entering into a cooperative agreement with the County of Los Angeles for agricultural inspector services if the agreement required that the county provide year-round services unless not less than 66% of the agricultural inspectors not afforded protections as permanent employees employed by the county providing year-round services under the cooperative agreement were afforded protections as permanent employees under the county's civil service or other personnel system. This bill would enact a similar provision and make it operative indefinitely.
Who sponsors AB 74?
AB 74 is sponsored by Ma.
What is the current status of AB 74?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 21, 2010. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 74?
Track AB 74 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 74

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 74

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →