California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1845 — Unemployment compensation benefits: overpayment assessments: termination: income tax withholding.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 783, Statutes of 2012.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2012. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law requires the Director of Employment Development to maintain a separate reserve account for each employer, and generally requires the director to credit each reserve account with all the contributions paid on the employer's behalf and to charge against the employer's reserve account unemployment compensation benefits paid to an unemployed individual during any benefit year during his or her base period. Under existing law, certain benefits paid to claimants are not charged to an employer's reserve account, except as provided, if the department rules that specified circumstances exist. This bill would provide that an employer's reserve account is not relieved of charges relating to a benefit overpayment established on or after October 22, 2013, if the department determines that the payment was made because the employer, or an agent of the employer, was at fault for failing to respond timely or adequately to requests of the department for information relating to the individual claim for unemployment compensation benefits, as provided. Existing law permits certain employing units to elect to pay the cost of benefits into the Unemployment Fund in lieu of paying contributions required of employers. Existing law provides that the cost of benefits charged to that employer includes benefits or payments improperly paid. This bill would provide that the cost of benefits charged to an employer under that election include credits of benefit overpayments actually collected by the department, unless the department determines that the payment was made because the entity, or an agent of the entity, was at fault for failing to respond timely or adequately to requests of the department for information relating to the individual claim for unemployment compensation benefits, as provided. This provision would apply to benefit overpayments established on or after October 22, 2013. Existing law requires each employer to report to the department, as specified, the hiring of any employee who works in this state and to whom the employer anticipates paying wages. This bill would additionally require each employer to report the hiring of any employee who previously worked for the employer, but had been separated from such prior employment for at least 60 consecutive days. Existing law allows an employer that is entitled to receive notice of the filing of a new or additional claim for unemployment benefits to submit to the Employment Development Department facts explaining the reasons for the claimant leaving the employer's employ; however, the employer is restricted to providing reasons only from a specified list that the department will use to determine the cause of termination. Existing law also allows a base period employer that is not entitled to receive notice of the filing of a new or additional claim for unemployment benefits, but is entitled to notice of computation, to submit to the department facts explaining the reasons for the claimant leaving the employer's employ; however, the employer is restricted to providing reasons only from a specified list that the department will use to determine the cause of termination. This bill would expand these lists to include as a reason, the claimant leaving the employer's employ for a substantially better job. Existing law allows an employer that is entitled to receive notice of the filing of a primary claim or additional claim for extended unemployment compensation benefits or federal-state extended benefits to submit to the Employment Development Department any facts explaining the reason for the claimant leaving the employer's employ; however, the employer is restricted to providing reasons only from a specified list that the department will use to determine the cause of termination. This bill would expand these lists to include the claimant leaving the employer's employ for reason of a substantially better job or to protect his or her family or himself or herself from domestic violence abuse. Existing law provides that a claim for unemployment compensation benefits may be canceled if the individual has not been deemed ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits, has not been overpaid unemployment compensation benefits, and has not collected unemployment compensation benefits. This bill would, in order to cancel a claim for unemployment compensation benefits, add an additional requirement that the individual request to cancel the claim during the benefit year of that claim or the extended duration period of that claim. Existing law authorizes the Employment Development Department to administer the federal-state unemployment insurance program and provides for the payment of unemployment compensation benefits to eligible individuals who are unemployed through no fault of their own. Federal law requires, on and after October 22, 2013, at the time a state agency determines an erroneous payment from its unemployment insurance fund was made to an individual due to fraud committed by the individual, the assessment of a penalty on the individual in an amount of not less than 15% of the amount of the erroneous payment, and requires that assessment to be deposited into the unemployment insurance fund of the state. Under existing law, if the Director of Employment Development finds that an individual has been overpaid unemployment compensation benefits because he or she, for the purpose of obtaining those benefits, either made a false statement or representation, with actual knowledge of the falsity, or withheld a material fact, the director is required to assess against the individual an amount equal to 30% of the overpayment amount. Existing law requires the assessments collected to be deposited in the Benefit Audit Fund. This bill would instead, for penalty assessments established on and after October 22, 2013, require that overpayment assessment amount to be deposited 50% into the Unemployment Trust Fund and 50% into the Benefit Audit Fund. By depositing additional amounts into the Unemployment Trust Fund in the Unemployment Fund, which is a continuously appropriated special fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Under existing law, if the Director of Employment Development finds that any employer or any employee, officer, or agent of any employer, in submitting facts concerning the termination of a claimant's employment or in submitting a written statement concerning the reasonable assurance of a claimant's reemployment pursuant to specified provisions of unemployment insurance law, willfully makes a false statement of representation or willfully fails to report a material fact concerning that termination or the reasonable assurance of that reemployment, the director must assess a penalty against the employer in an amount not less than 2 nor more than 10 times the weekly benefit amount of that claimant. Existing law requires the penalties to be deposited into the Employment Development Department Contingent Fund, a continuously appropriated fund. This bill would instead provide that the penalty be assessed on an employer or agent of the employer, depending on who the director finds was at fault for willfully making a false statement or representation or for willfully failing to report a material fact concerning that termination or the reasonable assurance of that reemployment. The bill would provide that if both the employer and the agent of the employer were at fault, this penalty would be assessed against the employer and another penalty would be assessed against the agent of the employer. This bill would further provide that the additional penalties that are assessed against an agent of the employer be available for the specified purposes upon appropriation by the Legislature for those purposes. Existing law requires employers to withhold income taxes each calendar quarter, file a withholding report, a quarterly return, a report of wages, and pay over the taxes so required to be withheld. Existing law requires employers to remit the total amount of income tax withheld within a specified number of banking days, and uses banking days to determine when a payment is complete. This bill would, under those provisions, on and after January 1, 2013, use business days to measure time instead of banking days, as provided. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 1088.5 of the Unemployment Insurance Code, proposed by AB 174 and AB 1794, that would become operative only if this bill and either or both of those bills are chaptered and become effective January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 783, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6649.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6605.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4927.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 16).

  12. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  17. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  18. Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  19. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  20. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5049.)

  21. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  22. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 25).

  23. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  24. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  25. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  26. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.

  27. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  28. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.

  29. Referred to Com. on INS.

  30. From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  31. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Solorio · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Solorio

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 76001
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 79001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Halderman — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hill — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Huber — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Cook — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Logue — Yea
Miller — Yea
Perea — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Campos — Yea
Allen — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Conway — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Williams — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Carter — Yea
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33004
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 36004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Evans — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Correa — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Anderson — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6001
Total 6001
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Dutton — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Price — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 74003
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 77003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Butler — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Carter — Yea
Knight — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Miller — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Allen — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Fong — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Conway — Yea
Davis — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Williams — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Eng — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Norby — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1845 do?
Existing law requires the Director of Employment Development to maintain a separate reserve account for each employer, and generally requires the director to credit each reserve account with all the contributions paid on the employer's behalf and to charge against the employer's reserve account unemployment compensation benefits paid to an unemployed individual during any benefit year during his or her base period. Under existing law, certain benefits paid to claimants are not charged to an employer's reserve account, except as provided, if the department rules that specified circumstances exist. This bill would provide that an employer's reserve account is not relieved of charges relating to a benefit overpayment established on or after October 22, 2013, if the department determines that the payment was made because the employer, or an agent of the employer, was at fault for failing to respond timely or adequately to requests of the department for information relating to the individual claim for unemployment compensation benefits, as provided. Existing law permits certain employing units to elect to pay the cost of benefits into the Unemployment Fund in lieu of paying contributions required of employers. Existing law provides that the cost of benefits charged to that employer includes benefits or payments improperly paid. This bill would provide that the cost of benefits charged to an employer under that election include credits of benefit overpayments actually collected by the department, unless the department determines that the payment was made because the entity, or an agent of the entity, was at fault for failing to respond timely or adequately to requests of the department for information relating to the individual claim for unemployment compensation benefits, as provided. This provision would apply to benefit overpayments established on or after October 22, 2013. Existing law requires each employer to report to the department, as specified, the hiring of any employee who works in this state and to whom the employer anticipates paying wages. This bill would additionally require each employer to report the hiring of any employee who previously worked for the employer, but had been separated from such prior employment for at least 60 consecutive days. Existing law allows an employer that is entitled to receive notice of the filing of a new or additional claim for unemployment benefits to submit to the Employment Development Department facts explaining the reasons for the claimant leaving the employer's employ; however, the employer is restricted to providing reasons only from a specified list that the department will use to determine the cause of termination. Existing law also allows a base period employer that is not entitled to receive notice of the filing of a new or additional claim for unemployment benefits, but is entitled to notice of computation, to submit to the department facts explaining the reasons for the claimant leaving the employer's employ; however, the employer is restricted to providing reasons only from a specified list that the department will use to determine the cause of termination. This bill would expand these lists to include as a reason, the claimant leaving the employer's employ for a substantially better job. Existing law allows an employer that is entitled to receive notice of the filing of a primary claim or additional claim for extended unemployment compensation benefits or federal-state extended benefits to submit to the Employment Development Department any facts explaining the reason for the claimant leaving the employer's employ; however, the employer is restricted to providing reasons only from a specified list that the department will use to determine the cause of termination. This bill would expand these lists to include the claimant leaving the employer's employ for reason of a substantially better job or to protect his or her family or himself or herself from domestic violence abuse. Existing law provides that a claim for unemployment compensation benefits may be canceled if the individual has not been deemed ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits, has not been overpaid unemployment compensation benefits, and has not collected unemployment compensation benefits. This bill would, in order to cancel a claim for unemployment compensation benefits, add an additional requirement that the individual request to cancel the claim during the benefit year of that claim or the extended duration period of that claim. Existing law authorizes the Employment Development Department to administer the federal-state unemployment insurance program and provides for the payment of unemployment compensation benefits to eligible individuals who are unemployed through no fault of their own. Federal law requires, on and after October 22, 2013, at the time a state agency determines an erroneous payment from its unemployment insurance fund was made to an individual due to fraud committed by the individual, the assessment of a penalty on the individual in an amount of not less than 15% of the amount of the erroneous payment, and requires that assessment to be deposited into the unemployment insurance fund of the state. Under existing law, if the Director of Employment Development finds that an individual has been overpaid unemployment compensation benefits because he or she, for the purpose of obtaining those benefits, either made a false statement or representation, with actual knowledge of the falsity, or withheld a material fact, the director is required to assess against the individual an amount equal to 30% of the overpayment amount. Existing law requires the assessments collected to be deposited in the Benefit Audit Fund. This bill would instead, for penalty assessments established on and after October 22, 2013, require that overpayment assessment amount to be deposited 50% into the Unemployment Trust Fund and 50% into the Benefit Audit Fund. By depositing additional amounts into the Unemployment Trust Fund in the Unemployment Fund, which is a continuously appropriated special fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Under existing law, if the Director of Employment Development finds that any employer or any employee, officer, or agent of any employer, in submitting facts concerning the termination of a claimant's employment or in submitting a written statement concerning the reasonable assurance of a claimant's reemployment pursuant to specified provisions of unemployment insurance law, willfully makes a false statement of representation or willfully fails to report a material fact concerning that termination or the reasonable assurance of that reemployment, the director must assess a penalty against the employer in an amount not less than 2 nor more than 10 times the weekly benefit amount of that claimant. Existing law requires the penalties to be deposited into the Employment Development Department Contingent Fund, a continuously appropriated fund. This bill would instead provide that the penalty be assessed on an employer or agent of the employer, depending on who the director finds was at fault for willfully making a false statement or representation or for willfully failing to report a material fact concerning that termination or the reasonable assurance of that reemployment. The bill would provide that if both the employer and the agent of the employer were at fault, this penalty would be assessed against the employer and another penalty would be assessed against the agent of the employer. This bill would further provide that the additional penalties that are assessed against an agent of the employer be available for the specified purposes upon appropriation by the Legislature for those purposes. Existing law requires employers to withhold income taxes each calendar quarter, file a withholding report, a quarterly return, a report of wages, and pay over the taxes so required to be withheld. Existing law requires employers to remit the total amount of income tax withheld within a specified number of banking days, and uses banking days to determine when a payment is complete. This bill would, under those provisions, on and after January 1, 2013, use business days to measure time instead of banking days, as provided. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 1088.5 of the Unemployment Insurance Code, proposed by AB 174 and AB 1794, that would become operative only if this bill and either or both of those bills are chaptered and become effective January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last.
Who sponsors AB 1845?
AB 1845 is sponsored by Solorio.
What is the current status of AB 1845?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2012. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1845?
Track AB 1845 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1845

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1845

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →