California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 863 — Workers' compensation.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 363, Statutes of 2012.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 10 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. (1) Existing law establishes certain requirements relating to qualified medical evaluators who perform the evaluation of medical-legal issues. This bill would modify the requirements of a qualified medical evaluator with respect to doctors of chiropractic, and would prohibit a qualified medical evaluator from conducting qualified medical evaluations at more than 10 locations. (2) Existing law provides that it is unlawful for a physician to refer a person for specified medical goods or services, whether for treatment or medical-legal purposes, if the physician or his or her immediate family has a financial interest with the person or in the entity that receives the referral, except as specified. This bill would additionally prohibit, except as specified, an interested party, as defined, from referring a person for certain services relating to workers' compensation provided by another entity, if the interested party has a financial interest in the other entity, as defined. The bill would provide that a violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor, and would authorize civil penalties of up to $15,000 for each offense. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law establishes the Workers' Compensation Administration Revolving Fund for the administration of the workers' compensation program, and other specified purposes. This bill would establish in the Department of Industrial Relations a return-to-work program, to be funded by non-General Fund revenues of one hundred twenty million dollars $120,000,000 that the bill would annually appropriate from the Workers' Compensation Administration Revolving Fund. (4) Existing law requires the Department of Industrial Relations and the courts of this state, except as provided, to recognize as valid and binding any labor-management agreement that meets certain requirements. Existing law applies this recognition only in relation to employers that meet specified requirements. This bill would add the State of California to the list of authorized employers for these purposes. (5) Existing law authorizes an employer to secure the payment of workers' compensation by securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self-insure either as an individual employer or as one employer in a group of employers upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the director of the ability to self-insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to employees. This bill would change the amount of a prescribed security deposit required of private self-insured employers, would delete a related audit requirement, and would, commencing January 1, 2013, prohibit a certificate of consent to self-insure from being issued to specified employers. This bill would require public self-insured employers to provide certain information to the director, and would require the Commission on Health and Safety and Workers' Compensation to conduct an examination of the public self-insured program, and to publish a preliminary and final report on its Internet Web site, as specified. Existing law requires that the cost of administration of the public self-insured program be a General Fund item. This bill would instead require that the cost be borne by the Workers' Compensation Administration Revolving Fund. Existing law establishes the Self-Insurers' Security Fund for purposes related to the payment of the workers' compensation obligations of self-insurers. This bill would revise the composition of the board of trustees of the Self-Insurers' Security Fund, would revise duties of the Self-Insurers' Security Fund, and would make related changes. (6) Existing law establishes certain procedures that govern the determination of an employee's eligibility for permanent disability indemnity commencing with the final payment of the employee's temporary disability indemnity. This bill would revise and recast these provisions. (7) Existing law establishes procedures for the resolution of disputes regarding the compensability of an injury. Existing law prescribes certain requirements relating to recommendations regarding spinal surgery. This bill would delete the provisions relating to spinal surgery. Existing law prescribes a specified procedure that governs dispute resolution relating to injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2005, when the employee is represented by an attorney. This procedure includes various requirements relating to the selection of agreed medical evaluators. This bill would revise and recast these provisions. (8) Existing law provides certain methods for determining workers' compensation benefits payable to a worker or his or her dependents for purposes of temporary disability, permanent total disability, permanent partial disability, and in case of death. This bill would revise the method for determining benefits for purposes of permanent partial disability for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013, and on or after January 1, 2014. This bill would provide, prior to an award of permanent disability indemnity, that no permanent disability indemnity payment be required if the employer has offered the employee a position that pays at least 85% of the wages and compensation paid to the employee at the time of injury, or if the employee is employed in a position that pays at least 100% of the wages and compensation paid to the employee at the time of injury, as specified. This bill would revise the method for determining benefits for purposes of permanent disability for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013. This bill would revise the amount of the award for burial expenses. Existing law, for injuries that cause permanent partial disability and occur on or after January 1, 2004, provides supplemental job displacement benefits in the form of a nontransferable voucher for education-related retraining or skill enhancement for an injured employee who does not return to work for the employer within 60 days of the termination of temporary disability, in accordance with a prescribed schedule based on the percentage of an injured employee's disability. Existing law provides an exception for employers who meet specified criteria. This bill would provide that the above provisions shall apply to injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2004, and before January 1, 2013. This bill would provide, for injuries that cause permanent partial disability and occur on or after January 1, 2013, for a supplemental job displacement benefit in the form of a voucher for up to $6,000 to cover various education-related retraining and skill enhancement expenses, as specified, which would expire 2 years after the date the voucher is furnished to the employee or 5 years after the date of injury, whichever is later. The bill would exempt employers who make an offer of employment, as specified, from providing vouchers. Existing law requires that, in determining the percentages of permanent disability, account be taken of the nature of the injury, the occupation of the injured employee, and his or her age at the time of the injury, and requires that specified factors be considered in determining an employee's diminished earning capacity for these purposes. This bill would provide that the above provisions shall apply to injuries occurring before January 1, 2013. This bill would, for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013, revise the factors to be considered in determining impairment and disability ratings for these purposes. (9) Existing law requires an employer to provide all medical services reasonably required to cure or relieve the injured worker from the effects of the injury. This bill would limit the provision of home health care services as medical treatment to specified circumstances. (10) Existing law generally provides for the reimbursement of medical providers for services rendered in connection with the treatment of a worker's injury. This bill would revise and recast these provisions, and would establish certain procedures to govern billing procedures and disputes. (11) Existing law requires every employer to establish a medical treatment utilization review process, in compliance with specified requirements, either directly or through its insurer or an entity with which the employer or insurer contracts for these services. This bill would require the administrative director to contract with one or more independent medical review organizations and one or more independent bill review organizations to conduct reviews in accordance with specified criteria. The bill would require that the independent review organizations retained to conduct reviews meet specified criteria and comply with specified requirements. The bill would require that final determinations made pursuant to the independent bill review and independent medical review processes be presumed to be correct and be set aside only as specified. The independent medical review process established by the bill would be used to resolve disputes over a utilization review decision for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013, and for any decision that is communicated to the requesting physician on or after July 1, 2013, regardless of the date of injury. The bill would require an independent medical review organization to conduct the review in accordance with specified provisions, and would limit this review to an examination of the medical necessity of the disputed medical treatment. The bill would prohibit an employer from engaging in any conduct that delays the medical review process, and would authorize the administrative director to levy certain administrative penalties in connection with this prohibition, to be deposited in the Workers' Compensation Administration Revolving Fund. The bill would require that the costs of independent medical review and the administration of the independent medical review system be borne by employers through a fee system established by the administrative director. (12) Existing law authorizes an insurer or employer to establish or modify a medical provider network for the provision of medical treatment to injured employees. This bill, commencing January 1, 2014, would require that a treating physician be included in the network only if the physician or authorized employee of the physician gives a separate written acknowledgment that the physician is a member of the network, and would require every medical provider network to include one or more persons employed as medical access assistants to help an injured employee find an available physician and assist employees in scheduling appointments. Existing law requires an employer or insurer to submit a plan for the medical provider network to the administrative director for approval. This bill, commencing January 1, 2014, would require that existing approved plans be deemed approved for a period of 4 years from the most recent application or modification approval date. The bill would authorize any person contending that a medical provider network is not validly constituted to petition the administrative director to suspend or revoke the approval of the medical provider network. The bill would authorize the administrative director to adopt regulations establishing a schedule of administrative penalties, not to exceed $5,000 per violation, or probation, or both, in lieu of revocation or suspension. (13) Existing law requires an employer to pay medical-legal expenses for which the employer is liable in accordance with specified provisions. This bill would establish a secondary review process to govern billing disputes relating to medical-legal expenses. (14) Existing law authorizes the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board to determine and allow specified expenses as liens against any sum to be paid as compensation. This bill would revise procedures relating to liens, including requiring that any payment of a lien for the reasonable expenses incurred by an injured employee be made only to the person who was entitled to payment for the expenses at the time the expenses were incurred, and not to an assignee, except as specified. The bill would require that certain documentation relating to a lien filing include certain declarations made under penalty of perjury. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require that all liens filed on or after January 1, 2013, for certain expenses, be subject to a filing fee, and that all liens and costs that were filed as liens, filed before January 1, 2013, for certain expenses, be subject to an activation fee, except as specified. The bill would dismiss by operation of law on January 1, 2014, all liens and costs filed as liens for which the filing fee or activation fee is not paid. This bill would require that all fees collected pursuant to these provisions be deposited in the Workers' Compensation Administration Revolving Fund. This bill would provide for the reimbursement of a lien filing fee or lien activation fee under specified circumstances. This bill would make related changes with respect to liens. (15) Existing law requires the administrative director, after public hearings, to adopt and revise periodically an official medical fee schedule that establishes reasonable maximum fees paid for medical services, other than physician services, and other prescribed goods and services in accordance with specified requirements. This bill would require the administrative director, after public hearings, to adopt and review periodically an official medical fee schedule based on the resource-based relative value scale for physician services and nonphysician practitioner services, as defined by the administrative director, in accordance with specified requirements. The bill would require, commencing January 1, 2014, and until the time the administrative director has adopted an official medical fee schedule in accordance with the resource-based relative value scale, that the maximum reasonable fees for physician services and nonphysician practitioner services be in accordance with the fee-related structure and rules of the Medicare payment system for physician services, and that the fees include specified conversion factors. This bill would require the administrative director, on or before July 1, 2013, to adopt, after public hearings, a schedule for payment of home health care services that are not otherwise covered, as specified. This bill would require the administrative director, on or before December 31, 2013, in consultation with the Commission on Health and Safety and Workers' Compensation, to adopt, after public hearings, a schedule of reasonable maximum fees payable for copy and related services. (16) Existing law authorizes the appeals board to receive as evidence and use as proof of any fact in dispute various reports and publications. This bill would add reports of vocational experts, as specified. (17) Existing law provides for the reimbursement of specified expenses for a deponent in connection with a deposition requested by the employer or insurer. This bill would require the employer to pay for the services of a language interpreter if interpretation services are required because the injured employee or deponent does not proficiently speak or understand the English language. (18) Existing law requires the State Personnel Board to establish, maintain, administer, and publish annually an updated list of certified administrative hearing interpreters and medical examination interpreters it has determined meet certain minimum standards. This bill would also authorize the administrative director or an independent organization designated by the administrative director to establish, maintain, administer, and publish annually an updated list of certified administrative hearing interpreters who, based on testing by an independent organization designated by the administrative director, have been determined to meet certain minimum standards, for purposes of certain workers' compensation proceedings and medical examinations. This bill would require a reasonable fee to be collected from each interpreter seeking certification, to cover the reasonable regulatory costs of administering the program. (19) This bill would delete certain reporting requirements, delete obsolete provisions, and make conforming and clarifying changes. (20) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 4903.1 of the Labor Code proposed by SB 1105 that would become operative only if SB 1105 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (21) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 363, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 4. Page 5099.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 5131.)

  6. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 5085.) Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  7. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.

  8. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  9. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 72. Noes 5. Page 6747.) Ordered to the Senate.

  10. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 6747.)

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (August 31).

  12. Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 6739.)

  13. Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 6684.)

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  15. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  16. Re-referred to Com. on INS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  17. Ordered to third reading.

  18. Read third time and amended. (Ayes 50. Noes 19. Page 6274.)

  19. Assembly Rule 69 suspended. (Page 6273.)

  20. Ordered to third reading.

  21. From inactive file.

  22. Notice of intention to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Charles Calderon.

  23. Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Charles Calderon.

  24. Ordered to third reading.

  25. From consent calendar.

  26. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  27. From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 17).

  28. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  29. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  30. Referred to Com. on INS.

  31. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  32. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 983.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  33. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  34. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 930.) (May 9).

  35. Set for hearing May 9.

  36. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 766.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  37. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  38. Set for hearing April 27.

  39. Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  40. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  41. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  42. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  43. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • De León · Primary
  • Solorio · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • De León

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Solorio

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SB 863 De León Senate Third Reading By SOLORIO

Passed 72 Yea · 5 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 70403
Republican 2000
Democratic 0100
Total 72503
% of votes cast 90%6%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Butler — Yea
Eng — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Fong — Yea
Carter — Yea
Allen — Yea
Huber — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Logue — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Williams — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Campos — Yea
Hall — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Nay
Jeffries — Yea
Beall — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Knight — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Norby — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Unfinished Supp 3 SB863 De León Concurrence

Passed 34 Yea · 4 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33202
Republican 0100
Democratic 1100
Total 34402
% of votes cast 85%10%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Huff — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Harman — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cannella — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
De León — Yea
Leno — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10002
Democratic 0001
Total 10003
% of votes cast 77%0%0%23%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Miller — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Torres — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Not Voting
Feuer — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting

Official roll call →

SB 863 Lieu Senate Third Reading By SOLORIO Amend By SOLORIO Set #1

Passed 50 Yea · 19 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4917011
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 5019011
% of votes cast 63%24%0%14%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Butler — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Fong — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Allen — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Huber — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Logue — Nay
Carter — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Williams — Yea
Bonilla — Not Voting
Halderman — Not Voting
Hall — Not Voting
Harkey — Not Voting
Cook — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Not Voting
Silva — Not Voting
Smyth — Not Voting
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Olsen — Not Voting
Perea — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass, to Consent Calendar.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Lara — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass and re-refer to Committee on Appropriations with recommendation: To Consent Calendar.

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 10000
Democratic 0001
Total 11001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Feuer — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Miller — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Carter — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35002
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Huff — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Dutton — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

healthcare labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 863 do?
Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. (1) Existing law establishes certain requirements relating to qualified medical evaluators who perform the evaluation of medical-legal issues. This bill would modify the requirements of a qualified medical evaluator with respect to doctors of chiropractic, and would prohibit a qualified medical evaluator from conducting qualified medical evaluations at more than 10 locations. (2) Existing law provides that it is unlawful for a physician to refer a person for specified medical goods or services, whether for treatment or medical-legal purposes, if the physician or his or her immediate family has a financial interest with the person or in the entity that receives the referral, except as specified. This bill would additionally prohibit, except as specified, an interested party, as defined, from referring a person for certain services relating to workers' compensation provided by another entity, if the interested party has a financial interest in the other entity, as defined. The bill would provide that a violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor, and would authorize civil penalties of up to $15,000 for each offense. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law establishes the Workers' Compensation Administration Revolving Fund for the administration of the workers' compensation program, and other specified purposes. This bill would establish in the Department of Industrial Relations a return-to-work program, to be funded by non-General Fund revenues of one hundred twenty million dollars $120,000,000 that the bill would annually appropriate from the Workers' Compensation Administration Revolving Fund. (4) Existing law requires the Department of Industrial Relations and the courts of this state, except as provided, to recognize as valid and binding any labor-management agreement that meets certain requirements. Existing law applies this recognition only in relation to employers that meet specified requirements. This bill would add the State of California to the list of authorized employers for these purposes. (5) Existing law authorizes an employer to secure the payment of workers' compensation by securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self-insure either as an individual employer or as one employer in a group of employers upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the director of the ability to self-insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to employees. This bill would change the amount of a prescribed security deposit required of private self-insured employers, would delete a related audit requirement, and would, commencing January 1, 2013, prohibit a certificate of consent to self-insure from being issued to specified employers. This bill would require public self-insured employers to provide certain information to the director, and would require the Commission on Health and Safety and Workers' Compensation to conduct an examination of the public self-insured program, and to publish a preliminary and final report on its Internet Web site, as specified. Existing law requires that the cost of administration of the public self-insured program be a General Fund item. This bill would instead require that the cost be borne by the Workers' Compensation Administration Revolving Fund. Existing law establishes the Self-Insurers' Security Fund for purposes related to the payment of the workers' compensation obligations of self-insurers. This bill would revise the composition of the board of trustees of the Self-Insurers' Security Fund, would revise duties of the Self-Insurers' Security Fund, and would make related changes. (6) Existing law establishes certain procedures that govern the determination of an employee's eligibility for permanent disability indemnity commencing with the final payment of the employee's temporary disability indemnity. This bill would revise and recast these provisions. (7) Existing law establishes procedures for the resolution of disputes regarding the compensability of an injury. Existing law prescribes certain requirements relating to recommendations regarding spinal surgery. This bill would delete the provisions relating to spinal surgery. Existing law prescribes a specified procedure that governs dispute resolution relating to injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2005, when the employee is represented by an attorney. This procedure includes various requirements relating to the selection of agreed medical evaluators. This bill would revise and recast these provisions. (8) Existing law provides certain methods for determining workers' compensation benefits payable to a worker or his or her dependents for purposes of temporary disability, permanent total disability, permanent partial disability, and in case of death. This bill would revise the method for determining benefits for purposes of permanent partial disability for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013, and on or after January 1, 2014. This bill would provide, prior to an award of permanent disability indemnity, that no permanent disability indemnity payment be required if the employer has offered the employee a position that pays at least 85% of the wages and compensation paid to the employee at the time of injury, or if the employee is employed in a position that pays at least 100% of the wages and compensation paid to the employee at the time of injury, as specified. This bill would revise the method for determining benefits for purposes of permanent disability for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013. This bill would revise the amount of the award for burial expenses. Existing law, for injuries that cause permanent partial disability and occur on or after January 1, 2004, provides supplemental job displacement benefits in the form of a nontransferable voucher for education-related retraining or skill enhancement for an injured employee who does not return to work for the employer within 60 days of the termination of temporary disability, in accordance with a prescribed schedule based on the percentage of an injured employee's disability. Existing law provides an exception for employers who meet specified criteria. This bill would provide that the above provisions shall apply to injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2004, and before January 1, 2013. This bill would provide, for injuries that cause permanent partial disability and occur on or after January 1, 2013, for a supplemental job displacement benefit in the form of a voucher for up to $6,000 to cover various education-related retraining and skill enhancement expenses, as specified, which would expire 2 years after the date the voucher is furnished to the employee or 5 years after the date of injury, whichever is later. The bill would exempt employers who make an offer of employment, as specified, from providing vouchers. Existing law requires that, in determining the percentages of permanent disability, account be taken of the nature of the injury, the occupation of the injured employee, and his or her age at the time of the injury, and requires that specified factors be considered in determining an employee's diminished earning capacity for these purposes. This bill would provide that the above provisions shall apply to injuries occurring before January 1, 2013. This bill would, for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013, revise the factors to be considered in determining impairment and disability ratings for these purposes. (9) Existing law requires an employer to provide all medical services reasonably required to cure or relieve the injured worker from the effects of the injury. This bill would limit the provision of home health care services as medical treatment to specified circumstances. (10) Existing law generally provides for the reimbursement of medical providers for services rendered in connection with the treatment of a worker's injury. This bill would revise and recast these provisions, and would establish certain procedures to govern billing procedures and disputes. (11) Existing law requires every employer to establish a medical treatment utilization review process, in compliance with specified requirements, either directly or through its insurer or an entity with which the employer or insurer contracts for these services. This bill would require the administrative director to contract with one or more independent medical review organizations and one or more independent bill review organizations to conduct reviews in accordance with specified criteria. The bill would require that the independent review organizations retained to conduct reviews meet specified criteria and comply with specified requirements. The bill would require that final determinations made pursuant to the independent bill review and independent medical review processes be presumed to be correct and be set aside only as specified. The independent medical review process established by the bill would be used to resolve disputes over a utilization review decision for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2013, and for any decision that is communicated to the requesting physician on or after July 1, 2013, regardless of the date of injury. The bill would require an independent medical review organization to conduct the review in accordance with specified provisions, and would limit this review to an examination of the medical necessity of the disputed medical treatment. The bill would prohibit an employer from engaging in any conduct that delays the medical review process, and would authorize the administrative director to levy certain administrative penalties in connection with this prohibition, to be deposited in the Workers' Compensation Administration Revolving Fund. The bill would require that the costs of independent medical review and the administration of the independent medical review system be borne by employers through a fee system established by the administrative director. (12) Existing law authorizes an insurer or employer to establish or modify a medical provider network for the provision of medical treatment to injured employees. This bill, commencing January 1, 2014, would require that a treating physician be included in the network only if the physician or authorized employee of the physician gives a separate written acknowledgment that the physician is a member of the network, and would require every medical provider network to include one or more persons employed as medical access assistants to help an injured employee find an available physician and assist employees in scheduling appointments. Existing law requires an employer or insurer to submit a plan for the medical provider network to the administrative director for approval. This bill, commencing January 1, 2014, would require that existing approved plans be deemed approved for a period of 4 years from the most recent application or modification approval date. The bill would authorize any person contending that a medical provider network is not validly constituted to petition the administrative director to suspend or revoke the approval of the medical provider network. The bill would authorize the administrative director to adopt regulations establishing a schedule of administrative penalties, not to exceed $5,000 per violation, or probation, or both, in lieu of revocation or suspension. (13) Existing law requires an employer to pay medical-legal expenses for which the employer is liable in accordance with specified provisions. This bill would establish a secondary review process to govern billing disputes relating to medical-legal expenses. (14) Existing law authorizes the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board to determine and allow specified expenses as liens against any sum to be paid as compensation. This bill would revise procedures relating to liens, including requiring that any payment of a lien for the reasonable expenses incurred by an injured employee be made only to the person who was entitled to payment for the expenses at the time the expenses were incurred, and not to an assignee, except as specified. The bill would require that certain documentation relating to a lien filing include certain declarations made under penalty of perjury. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require that all liens filed on or after January 1, 2013, for certain expenses, be subject to a filing fee, and that all liens and costs that were filed as liens, filed before January 1, 2013, for certain expenses, be subject to an activation fee, except as specified. The bill would dismiss by operation of law on January 1, 2014, all liens and costs filed as liens for which the filing fee or activation fee is not paid. This bill would require that all fees collected pursuant to these provisions be deposited in the Workers' Compensation Administration Revolving Fund. This bill would provide for the reimbursement of a lien filing fee or lien activation fee under specified circumstances. This bill would make related changes with respect to liens. (15) Existing law requires the administrative director, after public hearings, to adopt and revise periodically an official medical fee schedule that establishes reasonable maximum fees paid for medical services, other than physician services, and other prescribed goods and services in accordance with specified requirements. This bill would require the administrative director, after public hearings, to adopt and review periodically an official medical fee schedule based on the resource-based relative value scale for physician services and nonphysician practitioner services, as defined by the administrative director, in accordance with specified requirements. The bill would require, commencing January 1, 2014, and until the time the administrative director has adopted an official medical fee schedule in accordance with the resource-based relative value scale, that the maximum reasonable fees for physician services and nonphysician practitioner services be in accordance with the fee-related structure and rules of the Medicare payment system for physician services, and that the fees include specified conversion factors. This bill would require the administrative director, on or before July 1, 2013, to adopt, after public hearings, a schedule for payment of home health care services that are not otherwise covered, as specified. This bill would require the administrative director, on or before December 31, 2013, in consultation with the Commission on Health and Safety and Workers' Compensation, to adopt, after public hearings, a schedule of reasonable maximum fees payable for copy and related services. (16) Existing law authorizes the appeals board to receive as evidence and use as proof of any fact in dispute various reports and publications. This bill would add reports of vocational experts, as specified. (17) Existing law provides for the reimbursement of specified expenses for a deponent in connection with a deposition requested by the employer or insurer. This bill would require the employer to pay for the services of a language interpreter if interpretation services are required because the injured employee or deponent does not proficiently speak or understand the English language. (18) Existing law requires the State Personnel Board to establish, maintain, administer, and publish annually an updated list of certified administrative hearing interpreters and medical examination interpreters it has determined meet certain minimum standards. This bill would also authorize the administrative director or an independent organization designated by the administrative director to establish, maintain, administer, and publish annually an updated list of certified administrative hearing interpreters who, based on testing by an independent organization designated by the administrative director, have been determined to meet certain minimum standards, for purposes of certain workers' compensation proceedings and medical examinations. This bill would require a reasonable fee to be collected from each interpreter seeking certification, to cover the reasonable regulatory costs of administering the program. (19) This bill would delete certain reporting requirements, delete obsolete provisions, and make conforming and clarifying changes. (20) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 4903.1 of the Labor Code proposed by SB 1105 that would become operative only if SB 1105 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (21) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 863?
SB 863 is sponsored by De León and Solorio.
What is the current status of SB 863?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 863?
Track SB 863 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 863

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 863

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →