California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 1087 — Cities and counties: public safety services: contracts.

Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires a county that provides services through its appropriate departments, boards, commissions, officers, or employees to any city pursuant to a contract or law, to charge the city all those costs that are incurred in providing those services. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2012, provide that, unless otherwise stipulated in the contract, if a city that contracts with a county for public safety services through the county notifies the county of its intent to terminate the contract, then the county is authorized to require the city to provide a comprehensive fiscal analysis relating to the ability of the city to provide public safety services, as specified. This bill would also express a legislative finding and declarations that its provisions shall apply to all cities, including charter cities.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  3. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  4. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 45. Noes 29. Page 1518.)

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 18).

  8. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  9. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  10. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 4.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  12. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  13. In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  14. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  16. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  17. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  18. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  19. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Brownley · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Brownley

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 1087 BROWNLEY Assembly Third Reading

Passed 45 Yea · 29 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 442706
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 452906
% of votes cast 56%36%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Not Voting
Hagman — Nay
Butler — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Carter — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Huber — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Williams — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Gorell — Not Voting
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Campos — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Lara — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Beall — Yea
Conway — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Norby — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Perea — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Nay
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pan — Not Voting
Silva — Nay
Torres — Yea
Cook — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Not Voting
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Davis — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Lara — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1087 do?
Existing law requires a county that provides services through its appropriate departments, boards, commissions, officers, or employees to any city pursuant to a contract or law, to charge the city all those costs that are incurred in providing those services. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2012, provide that, unless otherwise stipulated in the contract, if a city that contracts with a county for public safety services through the county notifies the county of its intent to terminate the contract, then the county is authorized to require the city to provide a comprehensive fiscal analysis relating to the ability of the city to provide public safety services, as specified. This bill would also express a legislative finding and declarations that its provisions shall apply to all cities, including charter cities.
Who sponsors AB 1087?
AB 1087 is sponsored by Brownley.
What is the current status of AB 1087?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1087?
Track AB 1087 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1087

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1087

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →