Personal and corporate income taxes: deductions: illegal activities.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1369 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1369.
You're tracking AB 1369
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1369 — Personal and corporate income taxes: deductions: illegal activities.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 454, Statutes of 2011.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law allow various deductions in computing the income that is subject to the taxes imposed by those laws. Those laws, in modified conformity to federal income tax laws, disallow any deduction from gross income if that income is directly derived from, or directly tends to promote or further, illegal activities relating to lotteries, gaming, or horse racing, and other specified illegal activities. This bill would instead disallow a deduction for expenses attributable to income derived by a taxpayer from any criminal profiteering activity, specified illegal activities relating to drug trafficking, and insurance fraud, as provided. This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/04/11 - Chaptered Current pdf October 04, 2011
- Enrolled 09/09/11 - Enrolled pdf September 09, 2011
- Amended 05/18/11 - Amended Assembly pdf May 18, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- AB1369 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 454, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:30 a.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2304.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1817.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 16).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gatto · Primary
- Perea · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gatto
Co-sponsors (1)
- Perea
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 72 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 75 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1369 do?
- The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law allow various deductions in computing the income that is subject to the taxes imposed by those laws. Those laws, in modified conformity to federal income tax laws, disallow any deduction from gross income if that income is directly derived from, or directly tends to promote or further, illegal activities relating to lotteries, gaming, or horse racing, and other specified illegal activities. This bill would instead disallow a deduction for expenses attributable to income derived by a taxpayer from any criminal profiteering activity, specified illegal activities relating to drug trafficking, and insurance fraud, as provided. This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
- Who sponsors AB 1369?
- AB 1369 is sponsored by Gatto and Perea.
- What is the current status of AB 1369?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1369?
- Track AB 1369 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1369
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1369
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →