AB 391 is sponsored by Achadjian, Alejo, Alquist, Ammiano, Anderson, Beall, Block, Blumenfield, Bradford, Buchanan, Campos, Cannella, Cedillo, Atkins, Jones, Portantino, De León, Runner, Strickland, Conway, Correa, Davis, DeSaulnier, Donnelly, Dutton, Emmerson, Eng, Lowenthal, Josh (Democratic), Calderon, Lisa (Democratic), Fuentes, Fuller, Galgiani, Gordon, Garrick, Gatto, Gorell, Grove, Shannon (Republican), Hagman, Hall, Hancock, Harman, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jeffries, Lara, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Logue, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, Olsen, Norby, Padilla, Pan, Price, Perea, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, Valadao, Vargas, Wagner, Walters, Wieckowski, Williams, Wyland, Yee, Fong, Mike (Democratic), Beth Gaines, Bill Berryhill, V. Manuel Pérez, and Roger Hernández.

Where can I track AB 391?

Track AB 391 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 4 D · 1 R cosponsors

AB 391 — Secondhand dealers and pawnbrokers: electronic reporting.

Last action August 17, 2012 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 172, Statutes of 2012.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

✓
Introduced
✓
In Committee
✓
Passed Assembly
✓
Passed Senate
✓
To Executive
6
Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

Enacted

Current position in the legislative process.
83 sponsors

1 primary, 82 co-sponsors signed on.
Bipartisan support

Sponsored across 2 parties (4 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Cleared a recorded vote

Passed 11 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law generally requires secondhand dealers and coin dealers, as defined, to report specified transactions involving tangible personal property, on forms provided or approved by the Department of Justice, to the local law enforcement agency where their businesses are located. Existing law defines "tangible personal property" for these purposes, and excludes from that definition, among other items, commercial grade ingots defined to include, among other items, 0.99 fine ingots of gold, silver, or platinum. This bill would revise the definition of commercial grade ingots to include 0.99 fine or finer ingots of gold, silver, palladium, or platinum. Under existing law, secondhand dealers and coin dealers are required to report the information described above using an electronic reporting system 12 months after the Department of Justice develops that system. This bill would eliminate the electronic filing requirements for coin dealers, and would instead require that secondhand dealers report this information using the single, statewide, uniform electronic reporting system on and after the date that the system is implemented, as specified. (2) Existing law requires a local law enforcement agency to issue a license to engage in the business of a secondhand dealer or pawnbroker to an applicant who meets designated criteria. Existing law authorizes the local licensing authority and the Department of Justice to charge an initial licensure fee and a renewal fee, as specified. This bill would require the Department of Justice to charge a licensure fee and a renewal fee of no more than $300, as specified. The bill would also require licensees issued a license before the effective date of this bill to pay an additional fee of no more than $288 for the purpose of funding the single, statewide, uniform electronic reporting system, with payment due within 120 days of the enactment of this bill. The bill would require that the fees assessed by the department be deposited in the Secondhand Dealer and Pawnbroker Fund, which the bill would create in the State Treasury. The bill would require that the money in the fund be used by the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purpose of paying for specified regulatory costs, including the cost of implementing, operating, and maintaining the single, statewide, uniform electronic reporting system. The bill would also require applicants for a license to submit fingerprint images relative to a required criminal background check, with associated fee revenue to be deposited in the Fingerprint Fee Account, and would make those revenues available to the Department of Justice, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for these purposes. This bill would make findings and declarations of the Legislature, and state the intent of the Legislature, with regard to these matters. The bill would make other related conforming changes. The bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Chaptered 08/17/12 - Chaptered Current pdf August 17, 2012
Enrolled 08/06/12 - Enrolled pdf August 06, 2012
Amended 06/27/12 - Amended Senate pdf June 27, 2012
Amended 06/07/12 - Amended Senate pdf June 07, 2012
Amended 05/09/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 09, 2012
Amended 04/18/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 18, 2012
Amended 04/10/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 10, 2012
Amended 01/23/12 - Amended Senate pdf January 23, 2012
Amended 09/08/11 - Amended Senate pdf September 08, 2011
Amended 05/27/11 - Amended Assembly pdf May 27, 2011
Introduced 02/14/11 - Introduced pdf February 14, 2011
AB391 View text html

Action History

August 17, 2012
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 172, Statutes of 2012.
August 17, 2012
Approved by the Governor.
August 06, 2012
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
August 06, 2012
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 68. Noes 0. Page 5758.).
July 03, 2012
May be considered on or after July 6, 2012 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
July 03, 2012
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 3).
July 02, 2012
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5558.)
July 02, 2012
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
July 02, 2012
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
July 02, 2012
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4220.).
June 28, 2012
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
June 27, 2012
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
June 27, 2012
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, urgency clause adopted, passed, and to Assembly.
June 21, 2012
In Senate. Held at Desk.
June 21, 2012
Ordered to the Senate.
June 14, 2012
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 16 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
June 14, 2012
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 3907.).
June 07, 2012
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
June 06, 2012
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 4).
May 09, 2012
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
May 08, 2012
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 8).
April 18, 2012
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
April 10, 2012
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
February 02, 2012
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
January 24, 2012
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
January 24, 2012
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
January 23, 2012
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
January 23, 2012
Ordered to second reading.
January 23, 2012
From inactive file.
September 09, 2011
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Steinberg.
September 09, 2011
Ordered to third reading.
September 09, 2011
(Ayes 24. Noes 15. Page 2445.)
September 09, 2011
Withdrawn from committee.
September 08, 2011
Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 2430.)
September 08, 2011
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
September 08, 2011
(Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 2429.)
September 08, 2011
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
September 08, 2011
Withdrawn from committee.
August 25, 2011
In committee: Held under submission.
July 11, 2011
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
June 23, 2011
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
June 08, 2011
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
June 01, 2011
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
June 01, 2011
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 50. Noes 25. Page 1720.)
May 31, 2011
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
May 27, 2011
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
May 27, 2011
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
May 04, 2011
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
April 14, 2011
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
February 24, 2011
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
February 15, 2011
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
February 14, 2011
Read first time. To print.

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 82 co-sponsors · 39 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Not signed on (39)

39 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 39 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 391 PAN Concurrence - Urgency Added

August 06, 2012

Passed 68 Yea · 0 Nay · 12 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	66	0	0	11
Republican	2	0	0	0
Democratic	0	0	0	1
Total	68	0	0	12
% of votes cast	85%	0%	0%	15%

How each member voted (80)

Member	Party	Vote
Gorell	—	Yea
Halderman	—	Not Voting
Eng	—	Yea
Carter	—	Yea
Cedillo	—	Yea
Feuer	—	Yea
Fong	—	Yea
Conway	—	Yea
Furutani	—	Yea
Allen	—	Yea
Galgiani	—	Yea
Gatto	—	Yea
Gordon	—	Yea
Davis	—	Yea
Portantino	—	Yea
John A. Pérez	—	Yea
Mitchell	—	Yea
Hagman	—	Yea
Fletcher	—	Yea
Hill	—	Yea
Huber	—	Yea
Bonilla	—	Yea
Alejo	—	Yea
Ammiano	—	Yea
Beall	—	Yea
Dickinson	—	Yea
Huffman	—	Yea
Jeffries	—	Yea
Knight	—	Yea
Mendoza	—	Yea
Miller	—	Yea
Nestande	—	Yea
Norby	—	Yea
Olsen	—	Yea
Perea	—	Yea
Silva	—	Yea
Skinner	—	Yea
Swanson	—	Yea
Torres	—	Yea
Wagner	—	Yea
Atkins	—	Yea
Hall	—	Not Voting
Campos	—	Yea
Hayashi	—	Not Voting
Chesbro	—	Not Voting
Cook	—	Not Voting
Donnelly	—	Yea
Lara	—	Yea
Monning	—	Not Voting
Morrell	—	Yea
Solorio	—	Yea
Wieckowski	—	Yea
Achadjian	—	Yea
Block	—	Yea
Blumenfield	—	Yea
Bradford	—	Yea
Brownley	—	Yea
Buchanan	—	Yea
Harkey	—	Not Voting
Hueso	—	Yea
Logue	—	Not Voting
Ma	—	Yea
Mansoor	—	Yea
Nielsen	—	Not Voting
Pan	—	Yea
Smyth	—	Not Voting
Valadao	—	Yea
Williams	—	Yea
Butler	—	Not Voting
Yamada	—	Yea
Fuentes	—	Yea
Garrick	—	Yea
Beth Gaines	—	Yea
Bill Berryhill	—	Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal	—	Yea
Roger Hernández	—	Yea
V. Manuel Pérez	—	Yea
Calderon, Lisa	Democratic	Not Voting
Grove, Shannon	Republican	Yea
Jones, Brian W.	Republican	Yea

Official roll call →

amendments be concurred in.

July 03, 2012

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	8	0	0	1
Total	8	0	0	1
% of votes cast	89%	0%	0%	11%

How each member voted (9)

Member	Party	Vote
Butler	—	Yea
Eng	—	Yea
Hagman	—	Not Voting
Hill	—	Yea
Allen	—	Yea
Silva	—	Yea
Hayashi	—	Yea
Ma	—	Yea
Smyth	—	Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB391 Pan By Yee Urgency Clause

July 02, 2012

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	33	0	0	4
Republican	1	0	0	0
Democratic	2	0	0	0
Total	36	0	0	4
% of votes cast	90%	0%	0%	10%

How each member voted (40)

Member	Party	Vote
Yee	—	Yea
Hancock	—	Not Voting
Wyland	—	Yea
Lowenthal	—	Yea
Cannella	—	Yea
De León	—	Yea
Negrete McLeod	—	Yea
Evans	—	Yea
Rubio	—	Yea
Runner	—	Not Voting
Dutton	—	Yea
Harman	—	Yea
Anderson	—	Yea
Blakeslee	—	Yea
Huff	—	Yea
Leno	—	Yea
Lieu	—	Yea
Pavley	—	Yea
Simitian	—	Yea
Vargas	—	Yea
Wolk	—	Yea
Wright	—	Yea
Alquist	—	Yea
Hernandez	—	Yea
Kehoe	—	Yea
Liu	—	Yea
Price	—	Yea
Steinberg	—	Not Voting
Walters	—	Yea
Corbett	—	Yea
Emmerson	—	Not Voting
Correa	—	Yea
DeSaulnier	—	Yea
Fuller	—	Yea
Beth Gaines	—	Yea
Bill Berryhill	—	Yea
La Malfa	—	Yea
Calderon, Lisa	Democratic	Yea
Padilla, Stephen C.	Democratic	Yea
Strickland, Tony	Republican	Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB391 Pan By Yee Urgency Clause

June 14, 2012

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	34	0	0	3
Democratic	1	0	0	1
Republican	0	0	0	1
Total	35	0	0	5
% of votes cast	88%	0%	0%	13%

How each member voted (40)

Member	Party	Vote
Yee	—	Yea
Hancock	—	Yea
Harman	—	Yea
Hernandez	—	Yea
Liu	—	Yea
Wolk	—	Yea
Lowenthal	—	Yea
Cannella	—	Yea
De León	—	Yea
Negrete McLeod	—	Yea
Rubio	—	Yea
Evans	—	Yea
Fuller	—	Yea
Runner	—	Not Voting
Corbett	—	Yea
Dutton	—	Yea
Kehoe	—	Yea
Pavley	—	Yea
Price	—	Yea
Vargas	—	Yea
Wright	—	Yea
Alquist	—	Yea
Anderson	—	Yea
Blakeslee	—	Yea
Huff	—	Yea
Leno	—	Yea
Lieu	—	Yea
Simitian	—	Yea
Steinberg	—	Yea
Walters	—	Yea
Wyland	—	Not Voting
Emmerson	—	Yea
Correa	—	Yea
DeSaulnier	—	Yea
Beth Gaines	—	Not Voting
Bill Berryhill	—	Yea
La Malfa	—	Yea
Calderon, Lisa	Democratic	Yea
Padilla, Stephen C.	Democratic	Not Voting
Strickland, Tony	Republican	Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

June 04, 2012

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	6	0	0	1
Total	6	0	0	1
% of votes cast	86%	0%	0%	14%

How each member voted (7)

Member	Party	Vote
Lieu	—	Yea
Alquist	—	Yea
Price	—	Not Voting
Steinberg	—	Yea
Walters	—	Yea
Kehoe	—	Yea
Dutton	—	Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.

May 08, 2012

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	6	0	0	0
Democratic	1	0	0	0
Total	7	0	0	0
% of votes cast	100%	0%	0%	0%

How each member voted (7)

Member	Party	Vote
Hancock	—	Yea
Harman	—	Yea
Liu	—	Yea
Anderson	—	Yea
Steinberg	—	Yea
Price	—	Yea
Calderon, Lisa	Democratic	Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

July 11, 2011

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	9	0	0	0
Total	9	0	0	0
% of votes cast	100%	0%	0%	0%

How each member voted (9)

Member	Party	Vote
Runner	—	Yea
Kehoe	—	Yea
Lieu	—	Yea
Price	—	Yea
Steinberg	—	Yea
Alquist	—	Yea
Pavley	—	Yea
Walters	—	Yea
Emmerson	—	Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.

June 22, 2011

Passed 5 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	4	0	0	2
Democratic	1	0	0	0
Total	5	0	0	2
% of votes cast	71%	0%	0%	29%

How each member voted (7)

Member	Party	Vote
Yee	—	Yea
Runner	—	Not Voting
Leno	—	Yea
Lieu	—	Yea
Wyland	—	Not Voting
DeSaulnier	—	Yea
Padilla, Stephen C.	Democratic	Yea

Official roll call →

AB 391 PAN Assembly Third Reading

June 01, 2011

Passed 50 Yea · 25 Nay · 5 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	49	23	0	5
Republican	0	2	0	0
Democratic	1	0	0	0
Total	50	25	0	5
% of votes cast	63%	31%	0%	6%

How each member voted (80)

Member	Party	Vote
Gordon	—	Yea
Hagman	—	Nay
Feuer	—	Yea
Carter	—	Yea
Cedillo	—	Yea
Furutani	—	Yea
Fong	—	Yea
Hill	—	Yea
Allen	—	Yea
Huber	—	Yea
Huffman	—	Yea
Galgiani	—	Yea
Butler	—	Not Voting
Portantino	—	Yea
John A. Pérez	—	Yea
Mitchell	—	Yea
Garrick	—	Not Voting
Yamada	—	Yea
Gorell	—	Not Voting
Campos	—	Yea
Halderman	—	Nay
Bonilla	—	Yea
Atkins	—	Yea
Hall	—	Yea
Hayashi	—	Yea
Hueso	—	Yea
Fletcher	—	Nay
Knight	—	Nay
Chesbro	—	Yea
Lara	—	Yea
Conway	—	Nay
Logue	—	Nay
Mendoza	—	Yea
Miller	—	Nay
Ammiano	—	Yea
Block	—	Yea
Davis	—	Yea
Dickinson	—	Yea
Donnelly	—	Nay
Monning	—	Yea
Morrell	—	Nay
Nestande	—	Nay
Norby	—	Nay
Pan	—	Yea
Silva	—	Nay
Smyth	—	Nay
Torres	—	Yea
Wagner	—	Nay
Achadjian	—	Nay
Alejo	—	Yea
Beall	—	Yea
Blumenfield	—	Yea
Bradford	—	Yea
Brownley	—	Yea
Buchanan	—	Yea
Harkey	—	Nay
Jeffries	—	Not Voting
Ma	—	Yea
Mansoor	—	Nay
Nielsen	—	Nay
Olsen	—	Nay
Perea	—	Yea
Skinner	—	Yea
Solorio	—	Yea
Swanson	—	Yea
Valadao	—	Nay
Wieckowski	—	Yea
Williams	—	Yea
Cook	—	Nay
Eng	—	Yea
Fuentes	—	Yea
Gatto	—	Yea
Beth Gaines	—	Nay
Bill Berryhill	—	Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal	—	Yea
Roger Hernández	—	Yea
V. Manuel Pérez	—	Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa	Democratic	Yea
Grove, Shannon	Republican	Nay
Jones, Brian W.	Republican	Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

May 27, 2011

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	11	5	0	0
Democratic	1	0	0	0
Total	12	5	0	0
% of votes cast	71%	29%	0%	0%

How each member voted (17)

Member	Party	Vote
Campos	—	Yea
Davis	—	Yea
Gatto	—	Yea
Hall	—	Yea
Mitchell	—	Yea
Hill	—	Yea
Solorio	—	Yea
Donnelly	—	Nay
Nielsen	—	Nay
Norby	—	Nay
Wagner	—	Nay
Blumenfield	—	Yea
Bradford	—	Yea
Harkey	—	Nay
Lara	—	Yea
Fuentes	—	Yea
Calderon, Lisa	Democratic	Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

April 13, 2011

Passed 5 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other

Party	Yea	Nay	Present	Not Voting
Unaffiliated	4	1	0	1
Democratic	1	0	0	0
Total	5	1	0	1
% of votes cast	71%	14%	0%	14%

How each member voted (7)

Member	Party	Vote
Yamada	—	Yea
Furutani	—	Yea
Gorell	—	Not Voting
Miller	—	Nay
Swanson	—	Yea
Alejo	—	Yea
Allen, Benjamin	Democratic	Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety finance labor

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 391 do?: (1) Existing law generally requires secondhand dealers and coin dealers, as defined, to report specified transactions involving tangible personal property, on forms provided or approved by the Department of Justice, to the local law enforcement agency where their businesses are located. Existing law defines "tangible personal property" for these purposes, and excludes from that definition, among other items, commercial grade ingots defined to include, among other items, 0.99 fine ingots of gold, silver, or platinum. This bill would revise the definition of commercial grade ingots to include 0.99 fine or finer ingots of gold, silver, palladium, or platinum. Under existing law, secondhand dealers and coin dealers are required to report the information described above using an electronic reporting system 12 months after the Department of Justice develops that system. This bill would eliminate the electronic filing requirements for coin dealers, and would instead require that secondhand dealers report this information using the single, statewide, uniform electronic reporting system on and after the date that the system is implemented, as specified. (2) Existing law requires a local law enforcement agency to issue a license to engage in the business of a secondhand dealer or pawnbroker to an applicant who meets designated criteria. Existing law authorizes the local licensing authority and the Department of Justice to charge an initial licensure fee and a renewal fee, as specified. This bill would require the Department of Justice to charge a licensure fee and a renewal fee of no more than $300, as specified. The bill would also require licensees issued a license before the effective date of this bill to pay an additional fee of no more than $288 for the purpose of funding the single, statewide, uniform electronic reporting system, with payment due within 120 days of the enactment of this bill. The bill would require that the fees assessed by the department be deposited in the Secondhand Dealer and Pawnbroker Fund, which the bill would create in the State Treasury. The bill would require that the money in the fund be used by the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purpose of paying for specified regulatory costs, including the cost of implementing, operating, and maintaining the single, statewide, uniform electronic reporting system. The bill would also require applicants for a license to submit fingerprint images relative to a required criminal background check, with associated fee revenue to be deposited in the Fingerprint Fee Account, and would make those revenues available to the Department of Justice, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for these purposes. This bill would make findings and declarations of the Legislature, and state the intent of the Legislature, with regard to these matters. The bill would make other related conforming changes. The bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 391?: AB 391 is sponsored by Achadjian, Alejo, Alquist, Ammiano, Anderson, Beall, Block, Blumenfield, Bradford, Buchanan, Campos, Cannella, Cedillo, Atkins, Jones, Portantino, De León, Runner, Strickland, Conway, Correa, Davis, DeSaulnier, Donnelly, Dutton, Emmerson, Eng, Lowenthal, Josh (Democratic), Calderon, Lisa (Democratic), Fuentes, Fuller, Galgiani, Gordon, Garrick, Gatto, Gorell, Grove, Shannon (Republican), Hagman, Hall, Hancock, Harman, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jeffries, Lara, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Logue, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, Olsen, Norby, Padilla, Pan, Price, Perea, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, Valadao, Vargas, Wagner, Walters, Wieckowski, Williams, Wyland, Yee, Fong, Mike (Democratic), Beth Gaines, Bill Berryhill, V. Manuel Pérez, and Roger Hernández.
What is the current status of AB 391?: This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 391?: Track AB 391 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Keep track of this bill

Add this bill to your alerts and we'll email you when it moves — or keep it on a watchlist and see it in your weekly digest.

Create a free account →

At a glance

Identifier: AB 391
Jurisdiction: California
Session: 2011-2012 Regular Session
Type: Bill
Introduced: February 14, 2011
Status: Enacted
Prime sponsor: Pan

Make your voice heard on AB 391

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 391

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →

Secondhand dealers and pawnbrokers: electronic reporting.

Want to know if it passes?

Which district are you in?

You're tracking AB 391

AB 391 — Secondhand dealers and pawnbrokers: electronic reporting.

Prognosis

Odds of enactment

Summary

Bill Text

Action History

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (82)

Not signed on (39)

Votes

AB 391 PAN Concurrence - Urgency Added

amendments be concurred in.

3rd Reading AB391 Pan By Yee Urgency Clause

3rd Reading AB391 Pan By Yee Urgency Clause

Do pass as amended.

Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.

AB 391 PAN Assembly Third Reading

Do pass as amended.

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Subjects

Frequently asked questions

Make your voice heard on AB 391