State contracts: electronic goods: bid preference for refurbished electronics.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1427 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1427.
You're tracking SB 1427
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1427 — State contracts: electronic goods: bid preference for refurbished electronics.
Last action — Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires a state agency to meet certain requirements with respect to purchasing recycled products, as specified. Existing law requires a local public entity, if fitness and quality are equal, to purchase recycled products instead of nonrecycled products whenever recycled products are available, as specified, and authorizes a local public entity to give preference to suppliers of recycled products. The Target Area Contract Preference Act requires the state, when preparing a solicitation for a contract for goods or services in excess of $100,000, to award a preference to a California-based company that meet specified requirements, and the act also limits the maximum preference for a bidder under that act and all laws to a cumulative 15% or $100,000, as provided. This bill would require a state agency that accepts bids or proposals for a contract for electronic goods to provide a preference of 5%, as specified, to a company that offers to fulfill the contract only with refurbished electronics, as defined. This bill would also specify that the maximum preference under this bill and all laws is a cumulative 15% or $100,000, as provided.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/11/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 11, 2012
- Amended 05/25/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 25, 2012
- Amended 04/25/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 25, 2012
- Amended 04/17/12 - Amended Senate pdf April 17, 2012
- Introduced 02/24/12 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2012
- SB1427 View text html
Action History
-
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 25. Noes 14. Page 3664.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3596.) (May 24).
-
Set for hearing May 24.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 7.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3262.) (April 23).
-
Set for hearing April 23.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 7. Noes 4. Page 3105.) (April 10).
-
Set for hearing April 10.
-
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and E.Q.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 27.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- De León · Primary
- Corbett · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- De León
Co-sponsors (1)
- Corbett
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 35% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 31% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1427 do?
- Existing law requires a state agency to meet certain requirements with respect to purchasing recycled products, as specified. Existing law requires a local public entity, if fitness and quality are equal, to purchase recycled products instead of nonrecycled products whenever recycled products are available, as specified, and authorizes a local public entity to give preference to suppliers of recycled products. The Target Area Contract Preference Act requires the state, when preparing a solicitation for a contract for goods or services in excess of $100,000, to award a preference to a California-based company that meet specified requirements, and the act also limits the maximum preference for a bidder under that act and all laws to a cumulative 15% or $100,000, as provided. This bill would require a state agency that accepts bids or proposals for a contract for electronic goods to provide a preference of 5%, as specified, to a company that offers to fulfill the contract only with refurbished electronics, as defined. This bill would also specify that the maximum preference under this bill and all laws is a cumulative 15% or $100,000, as provided.
- Who sponsors SB 1427?
- SB 1427 is sponsored by De León and Corbett.
- What is the current status of SB 1427?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1427?
- Track SB 1427 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1427
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1427
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →