Dental care.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 694 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 694.
You're tracking SB 694
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 694 — Dental care.
Last action — Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to maintain a dental program that includes, but is not limited to, development of comprehensive dental health plans within the framework of a specified state plan. This bill would make these provisions inoperative for a specified period of time upon the creation of a Statewide Office of Oral Health within the State Department of Public Health with a licensed dentist who serves as the dental director. The bill would provide that the office would be established only upon receipt of sufficient funds, as specified, for the purposes of performing various duties relating to the oversight of dental care in California. This bill would prohibit General Fund moneys from being used to implement the provisions creating the office. This bill would authorize, until January 1, 2017, the dental director or, in the absence of a dental director, the Secretary of California Health and Human Services or his or her designee to provide administrative oversight with respect to a specified study conducted under described circumstances.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/06/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 06, 2012
- Amended 06/28/12 - Amended Assembly pdf June 28, 2012
- Amended 06/20/12 - Amended Assembly pdf June 20, 2012
- Amended 01/25/12 - Amended Senate pdf January 25, 2012
- Amended 01/12/12 - Amended Senate pdf January 12, 2012
- Amended 01/04/12 - Amended Senate pdf January 04, 2012
- Amended 03/29/11 - Amended Senate pdf March 29, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- SB694 View text html
Action History
-
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & C.P. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (June 26).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 2. Page 2723.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 2686.) (January 19).
-
Set for hearing January 19.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing January 17.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 2649.) (January 11).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 2622.) (January 9). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Set for hearing January 11 in HEALTH pending receipt.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Set for hearing January 9.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Emmerson · Cosponsor
- Price · Cosponsor
- Stephen C. Padilla · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic
Co-sponsors (2)
- Emmerson
- Price
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 5% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 694 do?
- Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to maintain a dental program that includes, but is not limited to, development of comprehensive dental health plans within the framework of a specified state plan. This bill would make these provisions inoperative for a specified period of time upon the creation of a Statewide Office of Oral Health within the State Department of Public Health with a licensed dentist who serves as the dental director. The bill would provide that the office would be established only upon receipt of sufficient funds, as specified, for the purposes of performing various duties relating to the oversight of dental care in California. This bill would prohibit General Fund moneys from being used to implement the provisions creating the office. This bill would authorize, until January 1, 2017, the dental director or, in the absence of a dental director, the Secretary of California Health and Human Services or his or her designee to provide administrative oversight with respect to a specified study conducted under described circumstances.
- Who sponsors SB 694?
- SB 694 is sponsored by Emmerson, Price, and Padilla, Stephen C. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 694?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 694?
- Track SB 694 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 694
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 694
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →