California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 2183 — Local government: assessors: county board of equalization: assessment appeals board: agents.

Last action — Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires every assessor to assess all property subject to general property taxation at its full value on the lien date, as provided, and to prepare an assessment roll in which all property within the county which it is the assessor's duty to assess is required to be listed. Existing law requires a county board of equalization or an assessment appeals board to equalize the valuation of taxable property within the county for the purpose of taxation. Existing law authorizes a taxpayer, with respect to each assessment year, to file an application for a reduction in an assessment, as provided, with the county board, which is the county board of supervisors meeting as a county board of equalization of an assessment appeals board. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2014, require an agent, as defined, representing a taxpayer before the assessor, a county board of equalization, or an assessment appeals board, to register with a registering jurisdiction, as defined, prior to representing a taxpayer before that jurisdiction. This bill would require specified information to be included in the agent registration, and would authorize the registering jurisdiction to prescribe the procedures, forms, and means of filing the agent registration. This bill would require the registering jurisdiction to set, charge, and collect a fee in an amount necessary to recover the costs of registration, including the amendment and renewal of registrations. This bill would impose certain affirmative duties upon each agent, and would prohibit each agent from engaging in certain activities. This bill would authorize the registering jurisdiction to reprimand, suspend, or deregister any agent from representation before that jurisdiction under certain circumstances, and to impose a monetary penalty on any agent who engages in certain prohibited activities, as provided. By imposing new duties upon local county officials with respect to the registration of agents, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law makes it unlawful for a person to, among other things, make any untrue or misleading statements in any manner in connection with the offering or performance of an assessment reduction filing service or to offer to perform an assessment reduction filing service without making a specified disclosure. Existing law defines "assessment reduction filing service" for these purposes to mean any service performed or offered to be performed for compensation in connection with the preparation or completion of an application or request of any kind for reduction in assessment of residential property or in connection with the assistance in any manner of another person to either prepare or complete an application or request of any kind for reduction in assessment of residential property or to provide comparable sales information in connection with an application or request for reduction in assessment of residential property. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2014, require an offeror of an assessment reduction filing service, as described above, to register as an agent prior to the performance of the service. Existing law requires the State Board of Equalization to make surveys in each county and city and county to, among other things, determine the adequacy of the procedures and practices employed by the county assessor in the valuation of property for the purposes of taxation and in the performance generally of the assessor's duties. This bill would expand the requirements of the survey conducted by the State Board of Equalization to include a review of the procedures and practices that regulate the behavior of agents, as defined. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  2. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 3).

  3. In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  5. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  6. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  7. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  8. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 4556.)

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 11).

  11. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  12. From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.

  13. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Smyth · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Smyth

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 74 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 72005
Republican 1001
Democratic 1000
Total 74006
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Halderman — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fong — Yea
Butler — Yea
Allen — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Logue — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cook — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Davis — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Furutani — Not Voting
Hueso — Not Voting
Lara — Yea
Campos — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Jeffries — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Torres — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Conway — Yea
Eng — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Campos — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Davis — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Knight — Yea
Norby — Yea
Smyth — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2183 do?
Existing law requires every assessor to assess all property subject to general property taxation at its full value on the lien date, as provided, and to prepare an assessment roll in which all property within the county which it is the assessor's duty to assess is required to be listed. Existing law requires a county board of equalization or an assessment appeals board to equalize the valuation of taxable property within the county for the purpose of taxation. Existing law authorizes a taxpayer, with respect to each assessment year, to file an application for a reduction in an assessment, as provided, with the county board, which is the county board of supervisors meeting as a county board of equalization of an assessment appeals board. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2014, require an agent, as defined, representing a taxpayer before the assessor, a county board of equalization, or an assessment appeals board, to register with a registering jurisdiction, as defined, prior to representing a taxpayer before that jurisdiction. This bill would require specified information to be included in the agent registration, and would authorize the registering jurisdiction to prescribe the procedures, forms, and means of filing the agent registration. This bill would require the registering jurisdiction to set, charge, and collect a fee in an amount necessary to recover the costs of registration, including the amendment and renewal of registrations. This bill would impose certain affirmative duties upon each agent, and would prohibit each agent from engaging in certain activities. This bill would authorize the registering jurisdiction to reprimand, suspend, or deregister any agent from representation before that jurisdiction under certain circumstances, and to impose a monetary penalty on any agent who engages in certain prohibited activities, as provided. By imposing new duties upon local county officials with respect to the registration of agents, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law makes it unlawful for a person to, among other things, make any untrue or misleading statements in any manner in connection with the offering or performance of an assessment reduction filing service or to offer to perform an assessment reduction filing service without making a specified disclosure. Existing law defines "assessment reduction filing service" for these purposes to mean any service performed or offered to be performed for compensation in connection with the preparation or completion of an application or request of any kind for reduction in assessment of residential property or in connection with the assistance in any manner of another person to either prepare or complete an application or request of any kind for reduction in assessment of residential property or to provide comparable sales information in connection with an application or request for reduction in assessment of residential property. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2014, require an offeror of an assessment reduction filing service, as described above, to register as an agent prior to the performance of the service. Existing law requires the State Board of Equalization to make surveys in each county and city and county to, among other things, determine the adequacy of the procedures and practices employed by the county assessor in the valuation of property for the purposes of taxation and in the performance generally of the assessor's duties. This bill would expand the requirements of the survey conducted by the State Board of Equalization to include a review of the procedures and practices that regulate the behavior of agents, as defined. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 2183?
AB 2183 is sponsored by Smyth.
What is the current status of AB 2183?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2183?
Track AB 2183 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2183

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2183

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →