California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 1013 — Child welfare services: realignment.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 35, Statutes of 2012.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 06, 2012. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law governs the adoption of unmarried minors. Under existing law, a licensed adoption agency includes both licensed county and private adoption agencies. Further, existing law authorizes the State Department of Social Services to provide adoption services in counties without a county adoption agency. Existing law further prescribes the procedure for adopting a child through an agency or the State Department of Social Services, as well as for independent adoptions. Under existing law, licensed county adoption agencies perform homefinding and placement functions, investigate, examine, and make reports upon petitions for adoption filed in the superior court, act as placement agencies for placing children for adoption, accept relinquishments for adoption, and perform other tasks. This bill would instead provide that county adoption agencies are no longer licensed by the State Department of Social Services, but are instead authorized to perform the above-described functions. The bill would define county adoption agency as one run by a county or consortium of counties. The bill would provide that the adoption procedures currently governing the State Department of Social Services and licensed adoption agencies would also apply to these county adoption agencies, as defined. Existing law governs proceedings to declare a minor a dependent child of the court and sets forth the applicable procedures, including regular review hearings, before a court may order a hearing to terminate parental rights. Existing law further requires specified actions in these proceedings by the agency supervising a child in foster care during dependency proceedings, as well as by the county adoption agency, or the State Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption agency in counties without county adoption agencies. Following the termination of parental rights in dependency proceedings, the dependent child may be placed for adoption. This bill would provide that the procedures currently required of the State Department of Social Services, licensed county adoption agencies, and agencies supervising children in foster care during dependency proceedings would apply to county adoption agencies. The bill would also delete references to the department acting as an adoption agency in counties that are not served by county adoption agencies. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to encourage adoption agencies to make adoption training programs available to prospective adoptive families. This bill would delete that requirement. Existing law, the California Fostering Connections to Success Act, revises and expands the scope of various programs relating to the provision of cash assistance and other services to and for the benefit of certain foster and adopted children, and other children who have been placed in out-of-home care, including children who receive Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) , Adoption Assistance Program, California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) , and Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program (Kin-GAP) benefits. Among other provisions, the act extends specified foster care benefits to youth up to 19, 20, and 21 years of age, described as nonminor dependents, if specified conditions are met, commencing January 1, 2012. This bill also would make a nonminor dependent, or nonminor former dependent, who has been receiving specified aid, as described above, between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2012, and who attains 19 years of age prior to January 1, 2013, or between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2013, who attains 20 years of age prior to January 1, 2014, eligible to continue to receive that aid, notwithstanding the age limitations in existing law, provided that the nonminor dependent or nonminor former dependent continues to meet all other applicable eligibility requirements. This bill would provide that a county is not precluded from seeking federal funding on behalf of eligible nonminor dependents or nonminor former dependents, as described in the bill, for whom the county has provided specified aid using county-only funds, on and after January 1, 2012. Existing law establishes transition jurisdiction for the juvenile court and specifies the criteria required to come within this jurisdiction. Existing law authorizes a nonminor to petition the juvenile court to resume dependency jurisdiction or to assume or resume transition jurisdiction, as specified. This bill would provide that nonminors who are eligible for aid pursuant to the bill also are within the transition jurisdiction of the juvenile court. The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by increasing county duties with respect to programs and services for nonminor dependents. Existing law creates the Local Revenue Fund 2011 in the State Treasury, and creates within the fund the Trial Court Security Account, the Local Community Corrections Account, the Local Law Enforcement Services Account, the Mental Health Account, the District Attorney and Public Defender Account, the Juvenile Justice Account, the Health and Human Services Account, and the Reserve Account. Under existing law, moneys from specified tax sources and other moneys that may be specifically appropriated are required to be deposited in the Local Revenue Fund 2011. The fund is continuously appropriated for designated public safety services, including, but not limited to, the prevention of child abuse, the provision of services to abused, neglected, and exploited children, the provision of services to vulnerable children and their families, and the provision of adult protective services. Existing law prescribes the state share of cost applicable to the child welfare program and the support and care of former dependent children who are wards of related guardians under the Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program (Kin-GAP) . This bill would require funding and expenditures for the child welfare program and Kin-GAP to be consistent with specified provisions relating to the Local Revenue Fund 2011, commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter. The bill similarly would revise the Independent Living Program for foster youth, and would require county social services departments to submit an annual Independent Living Program Report, including specified components, to the State Department of Social Services, consistent with federal law. By increasing county duties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Under existing law, the state is required to pass on certain federal funds to counties for the provision of child welfare services, except as specified. Existing law prohibits the state from requiring counties to provide matching funds in amounts greater than the amount required of the state by the federal government. This bill would delete the prohibition against the state requiring counties to provide matching funds in excess of the amount required of the state by the federal government. Existing law authorizes the Director of Social Services to enter into an agreement with a tribe, consortium of tribes, or tribal organization, regarding the care and custody of Indian children and jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings, under specified circumstances. Pursuant to these agreements, these child welfare activities are delegated to the tribe, consortium of tribes, or tribal organization, which is also required to provide specified matching funds. This bill would specify the share of costs required of the tribe, consortium of tribes, or tribal organization operating a program pursuant to the above agreements. The bill would require any share of costs not specified to be equal to the applicable county share of costs provided for under existing law. Existing law establishes the California Child and Family Service Review System administered by the State Department of Social Services, to review all county child welfare systems, covering, child protective services, foster care, adoption, family preservation, family support, and independent living. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by requiring counties to be responsible for and accountable to the department for specified child welfare program performance measures, and would specify the duties of the counties and the department in this regard. The bill would require funding and expenditures for the California Child and Family Service Review System to be consistent with specified provisions relating to the Local Revenue Fund 2011, commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter. This bill would revise State Department of Social Services procedures applicable when the department believes that a county is substantially failing to comply with law or regulation pertaining to any program administered by the department, and when county noncompliance results in a federal disallowance, deferral, or other financial consequence. This bill would revise operational and fiscal requirements applicable to various programs and services relating to foster and adoptive children, including requiring the funding and expenditures for these programs and services to be consistent with specified provisions relating to the Local Revenue Fund 2011, commencing with the 2011-12 fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter. These include programs and services relating to the support and care of these children, such as AFDC-FC and Kin-GAP; AFDC-FC performance standards and outcome measures, including with respect to children placed in private for-profit facilities; transitional services, including housing; specialized care increments and clothing allowances; administrative costs; county social worker visits; county "Options for Recovery" programs; community-based kinship support services programs; wraparound services; and child abuse and neglect prevention and intervention programs. The bill would eliminate state participation in clothing allowances commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year, and would make clothing allowances payable at the county's option, as specified. With respect to foster family agencies, the bill would incorporate the clothing allowance into a revised basic rate, as specified. Existing law establishes the continuously appropriated Transitional Housing for Foster Youth Fund in the State Treasury. This bill would eliminate this fund. Existing law establishes the Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) program, under which counties provide payments to foster care providers on behalf of qualified children in foster care, pursuant to prescribed rate schedules. This bill would require the department to establish, in consultation with specified entities, a workgroup to develop recommended revisions to the current AFDC-FC ratesetting system, and would require the workgroup to submit these recommendations to the Legislature by a specified date. Existing law declares the intent of the Legislature to comply with federal law relating to the repayment of federal foster care, adoption assistance, and Kin-GAP overpayments. Existing law requires counties to remit the appropriate amount of federal funds, upon identification of the overpayment. Certain amounts are excluded from the overpayment requirement. This bill would require counties to pay 100% of the cost of the federal overpayments described above, for overpayments identified on and after July 1, 2012, and would authorize the county to retain any funds collected from overpaid providers or recipients after remitting the federal share. Existing law requires every youth who is in foster care and nearing emancipation to be screened by the county for federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI) eligibility, as specified. This bill would revise county procedures with respect to screening foster youth and nonminors in the care of a related caregiver for SSI benefits. Existing law provides for the Adoption Assistance Program (AAP) , to be established and administered by the State Department of Social Services or the county, for the purpose of benefiting children residing in foster homes by providing the stability and security of permanent homes. This bill would require counties, pursuant to a process developed by the department and the County Welfare Directors Association of California, to report to the department on the expenditure of savings realized as a result of maximizing available federal adoption assistance funding, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would revise procedures applicable to the adoption of children who are HIV positive, or born to a substance-abusing mother. Existing law declares the intent of the Legislature to provide various services relating to family preservation and support, as specified, in connection with the statewide system of child welfare services. This bill would revise child welfare provisions relating to family preservation and support services, including requiring counties to expend funds for these activities in a manner that will maximize eligibility for financial participation under the federal Promoting Safe and Stable Families program. The bill also would require the State Department of Social Services and the Office of Child Abuse Prevention to provide specified administrative oversight, monitoring, and consultation, to ensure that federal funding is maintained and federal requirements are met. The bill would require family preservation and support services to be consistent with specified provisions relating to the Local Revenue Fund 2011, commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter. The bill would make related technical and conforming changes. Existing law declares that the foundation and central unifying tool in child welfare services is the case plan. Existing law specifies issues to be considered when out-of-home placement is used to attain case plan goals, including selection of the environment best suited to meet the child's special needs and best interests. This bill would revise the selection criteria relating to out-of-home placements. This bill would recast and revise, make technical changes to, and repeal obsolete, provisions relating to child welfare services and programs, including the AFDC-FC program, the Child Welfare Services Case Management System, an advisory committee on therapeutic day services standards, and a workgroup on group care for foster children or youth, and for children with serious emotional disorders. This bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Social Services. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 35, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5:45 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 11. Page 4142.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 51. Noes 26. Page 5466.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Withdrawn from committee.

  9. Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Page 5412.)

  10. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  11. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  12. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  13. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 10. Page 2977.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  14. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  15. Ordered to second reading.

  16. Withdrawn from committee. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 2916.)

  17. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  18. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 8.

  19. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 51 Yea · 26 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 502502
Democratic 1000
Republican 0101
Total 512603
% of votes cast 64%33%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Nay
Halderman — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Butler — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Eng — Yea
Fong — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Allen — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Davis — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Campos — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Conway — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Cook — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Knight — Nay
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Not Voting
Valadao — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Norby — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 27 Yea · 11 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 241102
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 271102
% of votes cast 68%28%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Cannella — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Huff — Nay
Rubio — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Nay
De León — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Harman — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Walters — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 23 Yea · 10 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211006
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 231007
% of votes cast 58%25%0%18%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Evans — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Harman — Nay
Runner — Not Voting
Hernandez — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Corbett — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Huff — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1013 do?
Existing law governs the adoption of unmarried minors. Under existing law, a licensed adoption agency includes both licensed county and private adoption agencies. Further, existing law authorizes the State Department of Social Services to provide adoption services in counties without a county adoption agency. Existing law further prescribes the procedure for adopting a child through an agency or the State Department of Social Services, as well as for independent adoptions. Under existing law, licensed county adoption agencies perform homefinding and placement functions, investigate, examine, and make reports upon petitions for adoption filed in the superior court, act as placement agencies for placing children for adoption, accept relinquishments for adoption, and perform other tasks. This bill would instead provide that county adoption agencies are no longer licensed by the State Department of Social Services, but are instead authorized to perform the above-described functions. The bill would define county adoption agency as one run by a county or consortium of counties. The bill would provide that the adoption procedures currently governing the State Department of Social Services and licensed adoption agencies would also apply to these county adoption agencies, as defined. Existing law governs proceedings to declare a minor a dependent child of the court and sets forth the applicable procedures, including regular review hearings, before a court may order a hearing to terminate parental rights. Existing law further requires specified actions in these proceedings by the agency supervising a child in foster care during dependency proceedings, as well as by the county adoption agency, or the State Department of Social Services when it is acting as an adoption agency in counties without county adoption agencies. Following the termination of parental rights in dependency proceedings, the dependent child may be placed for adoption. This bill would provide that the procedures currently required of the State Department of Social Services, licensed county adoption agencies, and agencies supervising children in foster care during dependency proceedings would apply to county adoption agencies. The bill would also delete references to the department acting as an adoption agency in counties that are not served by county adoption agencies. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to encourage adoption agencies to make adoption training programs available to prospective adoptive families. This bill would delete that requirement. Existing law, the California Fostering Connections to Success Act, revises and expands the scope of various programs relating to the provision of cash assistance and other services to and for the benefit of certain foster and adopted children, and other children who have been placed in out-of-home care, including children who receive Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) , Adoption Assistance Program, California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) , and Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program (Kin-GAP) benefits. Among other provisions, the act extends specified foster care benefits to youth up to 19, 20, and 21 years of age, described as nonminor dependents, if specified conditions are met, commencing January 1, 2012. This bill also would make a nonminor dependent, or nonminor former dependent, who has been receiving specified aid, as described above, between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2012, and who attains 19 years of age prior to January 1, 2013, or between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2013, who attains 20 years of age prior to January 1, 2014, eligible to continue to receive that aid, notwithstanding the age limitations in existing law, provided that the nonminor dependent or nonminor former dependent continues to meet all other applicable eligibility requirements. This bill would provide that a county is not precluded from seeking federal funding on behalf of eligible nonminor dependents or nonminor former dependents, as described in the bill, for whom the county has provided specified aid using county-only funds, on and after January 1, 2012. Existing law establishes transition jurisdiction for the juvenile court and specifies the criteria required to come within this jurisdiction. Existing law authorizes a nonminor to petition the juvenile court to resume dependency jurisdiction or to assume or resume transition jurisdiction, as specified. This bill would provide that nonminors who are eligible for aid pursuant to the bill also are within the transition jurisdiction of the juvenile court. The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by increasing county duties with respect to programs and services for nonminor dependents. Existing law creates the Local Revenue Fund 2011 in the State Treasury, and creates within the fund the Trial Court Security Account, the Local Community Corrections Account, the Local Law Enforcement Services Account, the Mental Health Account, the District Attorney and Public Defender Account, the Juvenile Justice Account, the Health and Human Services Account, and the Reserve Account. Under existing law, moneys from specified tax sources and other moneys that may be specifically appropriated are required to be deposited in the Local Revenue Fund 2011. The fund is continuously appropriated for designated public safety services, including, but not limited to, the prevention of child abuse, the provision of services to abused, neglected, and exploited children, the provision of services to vulnerable children and their families, and the provision of adult protective services. Existing law prescribes the state share of cost applicable to the child welfare program and the support and care of former dependent children who are wards of related guardians under the Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program (Kin-GAP) . This bill would require funding and expenditures for the child welfare program and Kin-GAP to be consistent with specified provisions relating to the Local Revenue Fund 2011, commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter. The bill similarly would revise the Independent Living Program for foster youth, and would require county social services departments to submit an annual Independent Living Program Report, including specified components, to the State Department of Social Services, consistent with federal law. By increasing county duties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Under existing law, the state is required to pass on certain federal funds to counties for the provision of child welfare services, except as specified. Existing law prohibits the state from requiring counties to provide matching funds in amounts greater than the amount required of the state by the federal government. This bill would delete the prohibition against the state requiring counties to provide matching funds in excess of the amount required of the state by the federal government. Existing law authorizes the Director of Social Services to enter into an agreement with a tribe, consortium of tribes, or tribal organization, regarding the care and custody of Indian children and jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings, under specified circumstances. Pursuant to these agreements, these child welfare activities are delegated to the tribe, consortium of tribes, or tribal organization, which is also required to provide specified matching funds. This bill would specify the share of costs required of the tribe, consortium of tribes, or tribal organization operating a program pursuant to the above agreements. The bill would require any share of costs not specified to be equal to the applicable county share of costs provided for under existing law. Existing law establishes the California Child and Family Service Review System administered by the State Department of Social Services, to review all county child welfare systems, covering, child protective services, foster care, adoption, family preservation, family support, and independent living. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by requiring counties to be responsible for and accountable to the department for specified child welfare program performance measures, and would specify the duties of the counties and the department in this regard. The bill would require funding and expenditures for the California Child and Family Service Review System to be consistent with specified provisions relating to the Local Revenue Fund 2011, commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter. This bill would revise State Department of Social Services procedures applicable when the department believes that a county is substantially failing to comply with law or regulation pertaining to any program administered by the department, and when county noncompliance results in a federal disallowance, deferral, or other financial consequence. This bill would revise operational and fiscal requirements applicable to various programs and services relating to foster and adoptive children, including requiring the funding and expenditures for these programs and services to be consistent with specified provisions relating to the Local Revenue Fund 2011, commencing with the 2011-12 fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter. These include programs and services relating to the support and care of these children, such as AFDC-FC and Kin-GAP; AFDC-FC performance standards and outcome measures, including with respect to children placed in private for-profit facilities; transitional services, including housing; specialized care increments and clothing allowances; administrative costs; county social worker visits; county "Options for Recovery" programs; community-based kinship support services programs; wraparound services; and child abuse and neglect prevention and intervention programs. The bill would eliminate state participation in clothing allowances commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year, and would make clothing allowances payable at the county's option, as specified. With respect to foster family agencies, the bill would incorporate the clothing allowance into a revised basic rate, as specified. Existing law establishes the continuously appropriated Transitional Housing for Foster Youth Fund in the State Treasury. This bill would eliminate this fund. Existing law establishes the Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) program, under which counties provide payments to foster care providers on behalf of qualified children in foster care, pursuant to prescribed rate schedules. This bill would require the department to establish, in consultation with specified entities, a workgroup to develop recommended revisions to the current AFDC-FC ratesetting system, and would require the workgroup to submit these recommendations to the Legislature by a specified date. Existing law declares the intent of the Legislature to comply with federal law relating to the repayment of federal foster care, adoption assistance, and Kin-GAP overpayments. Existing law requires counties to remit the appropriate amount of federal funds, upon identification of the overpayment. Certain amounts are excluded from the overpayment requirement. This bill would require counties to pay 100% of the cost of the federal overpayments described above, for overpayments identified on and after July 1, 2012, and would authorize the county to retain any funds collected from overpaid providers or recipients after remitting the federal share. Existing law requires every youth who is in foster care and nearing emancipation to be screened by the county for federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI) eligibility, as specified. This bill would revise county procedures with respect to screening foster youth and nonminors in the care of a related caregiver for SSI benefits. Existing law provides for the Adoption Assistance Program (AAP) , to be established and administered by the State Department of Social Services or the county, for the purpose of benefiting children residing in foster homes by providing the stability and security of permanent homes. This bill would require counties, pursuant to a process developed by the department and the County Welfare Directors Association of California, to report to the department on the expenditure of savings realized as a result of maximizing available federal adoption assistance funding, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would revise procedures applicable to the adoption of children who are HIV positive, or born to a substance-abusing mother. Existing law declares the intent of the Legislature to provide various services relating to family preservation and support, as specified, in connection with the statewide system of child welfare services. This bill would revise child welfare provisions relating to family preservation and support services, including requiring counties to expend funds for these activities in a manner that will maximize eligibility for financial participation under the federal Promoting Safe and Stable Families program. The bill also would require the State Department of Social Services and the Office of Child Abuse Prevention to provide specified administrative oversight, monitoring, and consultation, to ensure that federal funding is maintained and federal requirements are met. The bill would require family preservation and support services to be consistent with specified provisions relating to the Local Revenue Fund 2011, commencing with the 2011–12 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter. The bill would make related technical and conforming changes. Existing law declares that the foundation and central unifying tool in child welfare services is the case plan. Existing law specifies issues to be considered when out-of-home placement is used to attain case plan goals, including selection of the environment best suited to meet the child's special needs and best interests. This bill would revise the selection criteria relating to out-of-home placements. This bill would recast and revise, make technical changes to, and repeal obsolete, provisions relating to child welfare services and programs, including the AFDC-FC program, the Child Welfare Services Case Management System, an advisory committee on therapeutic day services standards, and a workgroup on group care for foster children or youth, and for children with serious emotional disorders. This bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Social Services. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors SB 1013?
SB 1013 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 1013?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 06, 2012. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1013?
Track SB 1013 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1013

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1013

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →