Forestry: timber harvesting plans.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2168 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2168.
You're tracking AB 2168
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2168 — Forestry: timber harvesting plans.
Last action — From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The Z'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973 prohibits a person from conducting timber operations unless a timber harvesting plan prepared by a professional forester has been submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. This bill would require the Director of Forestry and Fire Protection, if the director determines a preharvest inspection is necessary to review a timber harvesting plan, to coordinate with a specified interdisciplinary team to ensure that all necessary members of the team that request participation are present for the inspection. The bill would require a review team member who requests participation to make a good faith effort to participate in the scheduled preharvest inspection. The bill would authorize the director, if there are compelling reasons why a member of the review team cannot attend the initial inspection, and the director articulates those reasons, in writing, to the person who submitted the plan, to schedule an additional onsite visit to complete the initial inspection. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/22/12 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 22, 2012
- Amended 05/15/12 - Amended Assembly pdf May 15, 2012
- Amended 04/25/12 - Amended Assembly pdf April 25, 2012
- Introduced 02/23/12 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2012
- AB2168 View text html
Action History
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 1. Page 4920.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 9).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 16).
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Chesbro · Primary
- Dickinson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Chesbro
Co-sponsors (1)
- Dickinson
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 72 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 1% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2168 do?
- (1) The Z'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973 prohibits a person from conducting timber operations unless a timber harvesting plan prepared by a professional forester has been submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. This bill would require the Director of Forestry and Fire Protection, if the director determines a preharvest inspection is necessary to review a timber harvesting plan, to coordinate with a specified interdisciplinary team to ensure that all necessary members of the team that request participation are present for the inspection. The bill would require a review team member who requests participation to make a good faith effort to participate in the scheduled preharvest inspection. The bill would authorize the director, if there are compelling reasons why a member of the review team cannot attend the initial inspection, and the director articulates those reasons, in writing, to the person who submitted the plan, to schedule an additional onsite visit to complete the initial inspection. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 2168?
- AB 2168 is sponsored by Chesbro and Dickinson.
- What is the current status of AB 2168?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2168?
- Track AB 2168 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2168
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2168
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →