Antelope Valley Fairgrounds EE and PV Synergy Demonstration Project.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 58 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 58.
You're tracking SB 58
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 58 — Antelope Valley Fairgrounds EE and PV Synergy Demonstration Project.
Last action — Referred to Com. on U. & C.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the establishment of the Antelope Valley Fairgrounds EE and PV Synergy Demonstration Project, a project that would include the installation of cost-effective energy-efficient equipment and fixtures, and a photovoltaic solar energy system of up to 630 kilowatts. Existing law requires an electrical corporation providing electrical service to the Antelope Valley Fairgrounds to file a tariff with the Public Utilities Commission meeting certain criteria. A violation of these provisions is a crime. These provisions will be repealed on January 1, 2017. This bill would extend these provisions relating to the Antelope Valley Fairgrounds EE and PV Synergy Demonstration Project until January 1, 2018. Because the bill would extend the operation of provisions, a violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/31/11 - Amended Senate Current pdf March 31, 2011
- Introduced 12/21/10 - Introduced pdf December 21, 2010
- SB58 View text html
Action History
-
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1062.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
Set for hearing May 16.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 857.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 28.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 21.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Runner · Primary
- Knight · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Runner
Co-sponsors (1)
- Knight
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 58 do?
- (1) Existing law authorizes the establishment of the Antelope Valley Fairgrounds EE and PV Synergy Demonstration Project, a project that would include the installation of cost-effective energy-efficient equipment and fixtures, and a photovoltaic solar energy system of up to 630 kilowatts. Existing law requires an electrical corporation providing electrical service to the Antelope Valley Fairgrounds to file a tariff with the Public Utilities Commission meeting certain criteria. A violation of these provisions is a crime. These provisions will be repealed on January 1, 2017. This bill would extend these provisions relating to the Antelope Valley Fairgrounds EE and PV Synergy Demonstration Project until January 1, 2018. Because the bill would extend the operation of provisions, a violation of which would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 58?
- SB 58 is sponsored by Runner and Knight.
- What is the current status of SB 58?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 58?
- Track SB 58 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 58
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 58
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →