California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 91 — Adult day health care centers.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 119, Statutes of 2011.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the California Adult Day Health Care Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of adult day health care centers, with administrative responsibility shared between the State Department of Public Health, the State Department of Health Care Services, and the California Department of Aging pursuant to an interagency agreement. Existing law provides that a negligent, repeated, or willful violation of a provision of the California Adult Day Health Care Act is a misdemeanor. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified, low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law provides, to the extent permitted by federal law, that adult day health care be excluded from coverage under the Medi-Cal program. Existing law requires, concurrently with the submission of an application for initial licensure as an adult day health care center, an applicant to apply for eligibility certification as a provider of adult day health care services reimbursable under the Medi-Cal program. Existing law also prohibits a license from being issued or renewed for an adult day health care center that is not approved as a Medi-Cal provider of adult day health care services. This bill would remove the requirement that an applicant for initial licensure as an adult day health care center apply for Medi-Cal certification. This bill would also remove the prohibition against issuing or renewing a license for an adult day health care center that is not approved as a Medi-Cal provider of adult day health care services, and would make conforming changes. Existing law provides that if an adult day health care center licensee provides adult day program services, the adult day health care license is the only license required to provide these additional services. This bill would require a provider choosing to add an adult day program within the adult day health care facility to submit a notice to the State Department of Public Health. By changing the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would appropriate the sum of $1,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Public Health for administrative costs. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 119, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 1861.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 11. Noes 5. Page 1871.)

  6. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 1844.) Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  7. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.

  8. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  9. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 60. Noes 11. Page 2320.) Ordered to the Senate.

  10. Ordered to third reading.

  11. Withdrawn from committee.

  12. Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Page 2308.)

  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  14. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  15. Read second time.

  16. Ordered to second reading.

  17. Withdrawn from committee.

  18. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  19. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  20. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 2. Page 169.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  21. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  22. Ordered to second reading.

  23. Withdrawn from committee.

  24. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  25. From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 10.

  26. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

From committee: That the Assembly Amendments be concurred in.

Passed 11 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Total 11500
% of votes cast 69%31%0%0%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Rubio — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Evans — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Leno — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Huff — Nay
Liu — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Nay
La Malfa — Nay

Official roll call →

SB 91 B. & F. R. Senate Third Reading By BLUMENFIELD

Passed 60 Yea · 11 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 2000
Unaffiliated 571109
Democratic 1000
Total 601109
% of votes cast 75%14%0%11%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fong — Yea
Butler — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Allen — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Fletcher — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Huber — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Not Voting
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Not Voting
Nielsen — Nay
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Not Voting
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Williams — Yea
Mitchell — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Norby — Nay
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Unfinished Supp 1 SB91 Committee on B. & F.R. (Leno) Concurrence

Passed 24 Yea · 14 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 221302
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 241402
% of votes cast 60%35%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Rubio — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Runner — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Wolk — Not Voting
Cannella — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading SB91 Committee on B. & F.R.

Passed 22 Yea · 2 Nay · 14 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 202013
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 222014
% of votes cast 58%5%0%37%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Rubio — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Harman — Not Voting
Huff — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
Price — Not Voting
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

healthcare health-insurance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 91 do?
Existing law, the California Adult Day Health Care Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of adult day health care centers, with administrative responsibility shared between the State Department of Public Health, the State Department of Health Care Services, and the California Department of Aging pursuant to an interagency agreement. Existing law provides that a negligent, repeated, or willful violation of a provision of the California Adult Day Health Care Act is a misdemeanor. Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified, low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law provides, to the extent permitted by federal law, that adult day health care be excluded from coverage under the Medi-Cal program. Existing law requires, concurrently with the submission of an application for initial licensure as an adult day health care center, an applicant to apply for eligibility certification as a provider of adult day health care services reimbursable under the Medi-Cal program. Existing law also prohibits a license from being issued or renewed for an adult day health care center that is not approved as a Medi-Cal provider of adult day health care services. This bill would remove the requirement that an applicant for initial licensure as an adult day health care center apply for Medi-Cal certification. This bill would also remove the prohibition against issuing or renewing a license for an adult day health care center that is not approved as a Medi-Cal provider of adult day health care services, and would make conforming changes. Existing law provides that if an adult day health care center licensee provides adult day program services, the adult day health care license is the only license required to provide these additional services. This bill would require a provider choosing to add an adult day program within the adult day health care facility to submit a notice to the State Department of Public Health. By changing the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would appropriate the sum of $1,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Public Health for administrative costs. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors SB 91?
SB 91 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 91?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 91?
Track SB 91 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 91

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 91

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →