Local government finance: property tax revenue allocations: County of San Benito.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1676 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1676.
You're tracking AB 1676
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1676 — Local government finance: property tax revenue allocations: County of San Benito.
Last action — In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally requires that each jurisdiction be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing law provides for the computation, on the basis of these allocations, of apportionment factors that are applied to actual property tax revenues in each county in order to determine actual amounts of property tax revenue received by each recipient jurisdiction. This bill would deem to be correct those property tax revenue apportionment factors that were applied in allocating property tax revenues in the County of San Benito for each fiscal year through the 2000–01 fiscal year. This bill would, however, require property tax apportionment factors applied in allocating property tax revenue in the County of San Benito for the 2001–02 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter to be determined on the basis of apportionment factors for prior fiscal years that have been corrected or adjusted as would be required if those prior apportionment factors were not deemed correct by this bill. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of San Benito.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/15/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 15, 2012
- Introduced 02/14/12 - Introduced pdf February 14, 2012
- AB1676 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 5091.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 25).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Alejo · Primary
- Cannella · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Alejo
Co-sponsors (1)
- Cannella
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 44% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 75 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1676 do?
- Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally requires that each jurisdiction be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing law provides for the computation, on the basis of these allocations, of apportionment factors that are applied to actual property tax revenues in each county in order to determine actual amounts of property tax revenue received by each recipient jurisdiction. This bill would deem to be correct those property tax revenue apportionment factors that were applied in allocating property tax revenues in the County of San Benito for each fiscal year through the 2000–01 fiscal year. This bill would, however, require property tax apportionment factors applied in allocating property tax revenue in the County of San Benito for the 2001–02 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter to be determined on the basis of apportionment factors for prior fiscal years that have been corrected or adjusted as would be required if those prior apportionment factors were not deemed correct by this bill. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of San Benito.
- Who sponsors AB 1676?
- AB 1676 is sponsored by Alejo and Cannella.
- What is the current status of AB 1676?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1676?
- Track AB 1676 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1676
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1676
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →