Pharmacy.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 377 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 377.
You're tracking AB 377
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 377 — Pharmacy.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 687, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 9 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of pharmacies, including hospital pharmacies, by the California State Board of Pharmacy, and makes a knowing violation of that law a crime. Existing law prohibits the operation of a pharmacy without a license and a separate license is required for each pharmacy location. Under existing law, a hospital pharmacy, as defined, includes a pharmacy located outside of the hospital in another physical plant. However, as a condition of licensure by the board for these pharmacies, pharmaceutical services may only be provided to registered hospital patients who are on the premises of the same physical plant in which the pharmacy is located and those services must be directly related to the services or treatment plan administered in the physical plant. This bill would authorize a centralized hospital packaging pharmacy to prepare medications, by performing specified functions, for administration only to inpatients within its own general acute care hospital and one or more general acute care hospitals if the hospitals are under common ownership, as defined, and within a 75-mile radius of each other. The bill would require a centralized hospital packaging pharmacy to obtain a specialty license from the board, and the bill would make these licenses subject to annual renewal. The bill would condition both the issuance and renewal of a specialty license on a board inspection of the centralized hospital packaging pharmacy to ensure that the pharmacy is in compliance with the bill's provisions and regulations established by the board. The bill would impose specified issuance and annual renewal fees for a specialty license, and because these fees would be deposited into the Pharmacy Board Contingent Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would authorize a centralized hospital packaging pharmacy to prepare and store a limited quantity of specified unit dose drugs in advance of receipt of a patient-specific prescription in a specified quantity. The bill would impose various requirements on centralized hospital packaging pharmacies, including, but not limited to, that medications be barcoded to be readable at the inpatient's bedside and that medication labels contain specified information. The bill would make these pharmacies and pharmacists responsible for the integrity, potency, quality, and labeled strength of any unit dose drug product prepared by the packaging pharmacy. Because a knowing violation of these provisions would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/28/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 28, 2012
- Enrolled 09/11/12 - Enrolled pdf September 11, 2012
- Amended 08/24/12 - Amended Senate pdf August 24, 2012
- Amended 08/06/12 - Amended Senate pdf August 06, 2012
- Amended 04/14/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 14, 2011
- Introduced 02/14/11 - Introduced pdf February 14, 2011
- AB377 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 687, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:15 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 69. Noes 9. Page 6696.).
-
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (August 30).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Ayes 52. Noes 26. Page 6648.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 32. Noes 0. Page 4958.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 13).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 0. Page 1356.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 4).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & C.P. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
-
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B., P. & C.P.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Solorio · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Solorio
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 67 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 69 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 11% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 11% | 0% | 32% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 65 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 70 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Mitchell | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 377 do?
- Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of pharmacies, including hospital pharmacies, by the California State Board of Pharmacy, and makes a knowing violation of that law a crime. Existing law prohibits the operation of a pharmacy without a license and a separate license is required for each pharmacy location. Under existing law, a hospital pharmacy, as defined, includes a pharmacy located outside of the hospital in another physical plant. However, as a condition of licensure by the board for these pharmacies, pharmaceutical services may only be provided to registered hospital patients who are on the premises of the same physical plant in which the pharmacy is located and those services must be directly related to the services or treatment plan administered in the physical plant. This bill would authorize a centralized hospital packaging pharmacy to prepare medications, by performing specified functions, for administration only to inpatients within its own general acute care hospital and one or more general acute care hospitals if the hospitals are under common ownership, as defined, and within a 75-mile radius of each other. The bill would require a centralized hospital packaging pharmacy to obtain a specialty license from the board, and the bill would make these licenses subject to annual renewal. The bill would condition both the issuance and renewal of a specialty license on a board inspection of the centralized hospital packaging pharmacy to ensure that the pharmacy is in compliance with the bill's provisions and regulations established by the board. The bill would impose specified issuance and annual renewal fees for a specialty license, and because these fees would be deposited into the Pharmacy Board Contingent Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would authorize a centralized hospital packaging pharmacy to prepare and store a limited quantity of specified unit dose drugs in advance of receipt of a patient-specific prescription in a specified quantity. The bill would impose various requirements on centralized hospital packaging pharmacies, including, but not limited to, that medications be barcoded to be readable at the inpatient's bedside and that medication labels contain specified information. The bill would make these pharmacies and pharmacists responsible for the integrity, potency, quality, and labeled strength of any unit dose drug product prepared by the packaging pharmacy. Because a knowing violation of these provisions would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 377?
- AB 377 is sponsored by Solorio.
- What is the current status of AB 377?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 377?
- Track AB 377 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 377
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 377
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →