California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 664 — Infrastructure financing districts: America's Cup venues.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 314, Statutes of 2011.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 78% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts, including districts that include specified waterfront property, adopt infrastructure financing plans for those districts, and issue bonds financed by projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to fund certain public facilities, pursuant to a specified procedure. Existing property tax law establishes various procedures and requirements with respect to the annual apportionment and allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, including increased revenues from these infrastructure financing districts. This bill would authorize the adoption under these provisions of financing plans for special waterfront districts that include the waterfront area in the City and County of San Francisco designated as the America's Cup venues, and the use of specified tax revenues produced in the districts for the construction of the Port of San Francisco's maritime facilities at Pier 27, improvement of publicly held waterfront lands used as viewing sites, and other matters, subject to specified allocation procedures. It would require the county board of supervisors to submit a fiscal analysis to the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank for review and approval before adopting the resolution authorizing the issuance of debt pursuant to these provisions. The bill would exempt the issuance of tax increment bonds in a waterfront district from local voter approval requirements and would authorize those bonds to be sold at a negotiated sale. The bill would enact other related provisions. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City and County of San Francisco.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 314, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 1. Page 3199.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 27. Noes 8. Page 2344.).

  7. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (August 25).

  9. In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  12. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 6).

  14. Measure version as amended on June 29 corrected.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  16. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  17. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  18. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  19. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  20. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1652.)

  21. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  22. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).

  23. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  24. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  25. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  26. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  27. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  28. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  29. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  30. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  31. From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.

  32. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Ammiano · Primary
  • Gordon · Cosponsor
  • Hill · Cosponsor
  • Leno · Cosponsor
  • Ma · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Ammiano

Co-sponsors (4)

  • Gordon
  • Hill
  • Leno
  • Ma

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 664 AMMIANO Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 78 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 75101
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 78101
% of votes cast 98%1%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Allen — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lara — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Logue — Yea
Fong — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Monning — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Silva — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB664 Ammiano By Leno

Passed 27 Yea · 8 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 25705
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 27805
% of votes cast 68%20%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Harman — Nay
Leno — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Correa — Not Voting
Dutton — Nay
Simitian — Not Voting
Vargas — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 6 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6300
Total 6300
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Emmerson — Nay

Official roll call →

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

AB 664 AMMIANO Assembly Third Reading

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 2000
Unaffiliated 76001
Democratic 1000
Total 79001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Campos — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Knight — Yea
Carter — Yea
Logue — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Miller — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Cook — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Perea — Yea
Silva — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Allen — Yea
Eng — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Conway — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Williams — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Campos — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Lara — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation housing transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 664 do?
Existing law authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts, including districts that include specified waterfront property, adopt infrastructure financing plans for those districts, and issue bonds financed by projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to fund certain public facilities, pursuant to a specified procedure. Existing property tax law establishes various procedures and requirements with respect to the annual apportionment and allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, including increased revenues from these infrastructure financing districts. This bill would authorize the adoption under these provisions of financing plans for special waterfront districts that include the waterfront area in the City and County of San Francisco designated as the America's Cup venues, and the use of specified tax revenues produced in the districts for the construction of the Port of San Francisco's maritime facilities at Pier 27, improvement of publicly held waterfront lands used as viewing sites, and other matters, subject to specified allocation procedures. It would require the county board of supervisors to submit a fiscal analysis to the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank for review and approval before adopting the resolution authorizing the issuance of debt pursuant to these provisions. The bill would exempt the issuance of tax increment bonds in a waterfront district from local voter approval requirements and would authorize those bonds to be sold at a negotiated sale. The bill would enact other related provisions. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City and County of San Francisco.
Who sponsors AB 664?
AB 664 is sponsored by Ammiano, Gordon, Hill, Leno, and Ma.
What is the current status of AB 664?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 664?
Track AB 664 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 664

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 664

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →