California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 468 — Property taxes: TEA formula allocation: maintenance or improvement districts: City of Simi Valley.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 319, Statutes of 2011.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing property tax law requires the auditor of each county with qualifying cities, as defined, to make certain property tax revenue allocations to those cities in accordance with an established Tax Equity Allocation (TEA) formula and to make corresponding reductions in the amount of property tax revenue that is allocated to the county, as specified. This bill, commencing with the 2012–13 fiscal year, would prohibit the auditor of the County of Ventura from reducing the amount distributed to the City of Simi Valley by reason of that city receiving property taxes previously allocated to a maintenance or improvement district pursuant to specified provisions. This bill would require the City of Simi Valley to reimburse the auditor for the actual and reasonable costs incurred by the auditor to administer these allocations, as provided. This bill would also make findings and declarations regarding the necessity of a special statute. By imposing new duties upon county officials in the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 319, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2834.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2129.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 11).

  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  13. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  14. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1724.).

  15. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  16. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).

  18. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  19. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  21. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  22. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  23. From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.

  24. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Smyth · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Smyth

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 468 SMYTH Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 74003
Democratic 1000
Republican 2000
Total 77003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Halderman — Yea
Butler — Yea
Carter — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Huber — Yea
Perea — Yea
Bonilla — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Fong — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Knight — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Williams — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
Galgiani — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB468 Smyth By Strickland Urgency Clause

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34003
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Huff — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Evans — Not Voting
Rubio — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

AB 468 SMYTH Third Reading Urgency

Passed 76 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 73004
Republican 2000
Democratic 1000
Total 76004
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Butler — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Fong — Yea
Carter — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hill — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cook — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Williams — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Garrick — Not Voting
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Conway — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Campos — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 468 do?
Existing property tax law requires the auditor of each county with qualifying cities, as defined, to make certain property tax revenue allocations to those cities in accordance with an established Tax Equity Allocation (TEA) formula and to make corresponding reductions in the amount of property tax revenue that is allocated to the county, as specified. This bill, commencing with the 2012–13 fiscal year, would prohibit the auditor of the County of Ventura from reducing the amount distributed to the City of Simi Valley by reason of that city receiving property taxes previously allocated to a maintenance or improvement district pursuant to specified provisions. This bill would require the City of Simi Valley to reimburse the auditor for the actual and reasonable costs incurred by the auditor to administer these allocations, as provided. This bill would also make findings and declarations regarding the necessity of a special statute. By imposing new duties upon county officials in the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 468?
AB 468 is sponsored by Smyth.
What is the current status of AB 468?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 468?
Track AB 468 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 468

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 468

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →