Tenants: foreclosure and unlawful detainer.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2610 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2610.
You're tracking AB 2610
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2610 — Tenants: foreclosure and unlawful detainer.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 562, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2012. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
7 sponsors
1 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires a notice of sale to be posted before any power of sale can be exercised under the power of sale contained in any deed of trust or mortgage. Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a resident of property upon which a notice of sale has been posted to be provided a specified notice advising the resident that, among other things, if the person is renting the property, the new property owner may either give the tenant a new lease or rental agreement, or provide the tenant with a 60-day eviction notice, and that other laws may prohibit the eviction or provide the tenant with a longer notice before eviction. Existing law makes it an infraction to tear down the notice within 72 hours of posting. Existing law requires a state government entity to make translations of the notice available in 5 specified languages, for use by a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, in order to satisfy the notice requirements. This bill would revise certain portions of the notice to instead require a resident of property upon which a notice of sale has been posted to be advised that if the person is renting the property, the new property owner may either give the tenant a new lease or rental agreement, or provide the tenant with a 90-day eviction notice. The bill would require the notice to advise a tenant who has a lease that the new property owner is required to honor the lease unless the new owner will occupy the property as a primary residence or under other limited circumstances. The bill would require the Department of Consumer Affairs to make translations of the notice available, as described above. The bill would provide that these changes to the notice would become operative on March 1, 2013, or 60 days following posting of a dated notice incorporating those amendments on the Department of Consumer Affairs Internet Web site, whichever date is later. The bill would extend the operation of these provisions until December 31, 2019. By extending the operation of provisions establishing a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law provides, that in an unlawful detainer action, if an owner or owner's agent has obtained service of a prejudgment claim of right to possession, as specified, no occupant of the premises, whether or not that occupant is named in the judgment for possession, may object to the enforcement of the judgment, as specified. This bill would provide that in any action for unlawful detainer resulting from a foreclosure sale of a rental housing unit pursuant to specified provisions, the above provisions regarding objection to the enforcement of a judgment do not limit the right of a tenant or subtenant to file a prejudgment claim of right of possession or to object to enforcement of a judgment for possession, regardless of whether the tenant or subtenant was served with a prejudgment claim of right to possession, as specified. (3) Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a tenant or subtenant in possession of a rental housing unit at the time that property is sold in foreclosure to be provided 60 days' written notice to quit before the tenant or subtenant may be removed from the property, as specified. This bill would instead require a tenant or subtenant in possession of a rental housing unit under a month-to-month lease at the time that property is sold in foreclosure to be provided 90 days' written notice to quit before the tenant or subtenant may be removed from the property. The bill would provide tenants or subtenants holding possession of a rental housing unit under a fixed-term residential lease entered into before transfer of title at the foreclosure sale the right to possession until the end of the lease term, except in specified circumstances. The bill would also extend the operation of these provisions until December 31, 2019. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/25/12 - Chaptered Current pdf September 25, 2012
- Enrolled 08/31/12 - Enrolled pdf August 31, 2012
- Amended 08/20/12 - Amended Senate pdf August 20, 2012
- Amended 08/08/12 - Amended Senate pdf August 08, 2012
- Amended 05/30/12 - Amended Assembly pdf May 30, 2012
- Amended 04/19/12 - Amended Assembly pdf April 19, 2012
- Amended 03/29/12 - Amended Assembly pdf March 29, 2012
- Introduced 02/24/12 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2012
- AB2610 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 562, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:25 a.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 69. Noes 9. Page 6386.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6357.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4750.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 14. Page 5203.)
-
Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Page 5176.)
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 5139.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 16).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 17).
-
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and H. & C.D. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Carter · Cosponsor
- Corbett · Cosponsor
- DeSaulnier · Cosponsor
- Hancock · Cosponsor
- Leno · Cosponsor
- Pavley · Cosponsor
- Skinner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 115 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Skinner
Co-sponsors (6)
- Carter
- Corbett
- DeSaulnier
- Hancock
- Leno
- Pavley
Not signed on (115)
115 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 115 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 69 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 11% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 12 | 0 | 10 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 14 | 0 | 10 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 18% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Mansoor | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Not Voting |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 29% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2610 do?
- (1) Existing law requires a notice of sale to be posted before any power of sale can be exercised under the power of sale contained in any deed of trust or mortgage. Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a resident of property upon which a notice of sale has been posted to be provided a specified notice advising the resident that, among other things, if the person is renting the property, the new property owner may either give the tenant a new lease or rental agreement, or provide the tenant with a 60-day eviction notice, and that other laws may prohibit the eviction or provide the tenant with a longer notice before eviction. Existing law makes it an infraction to tear down the notice within 72 hours of posting. Existing law requires a state government entity to make translations of the notice available in 5 specified languages, for use by a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, in order to satisfy the notice requirements. This bill would revise certain portions of the notice to instead require a resident of property upon which a notice of sale has been posted to be advised that if the person is renting the property, the new property owner may either give the tenant a new lease or rental agreement, or provide the tenant with a 90-day eviction notice. The bill would require the notice to advise a tenant who has a lease that the new property owner is required to honor the lease unless the new owner will occupy the property as a primary residence or under other limited circumstances. The bill would require the Department of Consumer Affairs to make translations of the notice available, as described above. The bill would provide that these changes to the notice would become operative on March 1, 2013, or 60 days following posting of a dated notice incorporating those amendments on the Department of Consumer Affairs Internet Web site, whichever date is later. The bill would extend the operation of these provisions until December 31, 2019. By extending the operation of provisions establishing a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law provides, that in an unlawful detainer action, if an owner or owner's agent has obtained service of a prejudgment claim of right to possession, as specified, no occupant of the premises, whether or not that occupant is named in the judgment for possession, may object to the enforcement of the judgment, as specified. This bill would provide that in any action for unlawful detainer resulting from a foreclosure sale of a rental housing unit pursuant to specified provisions, the above provisions regarding objection to the enforcement of a judgment do not limit the right of a tenant or subtenant to file a prejudgment claim of right of possession or to object to enforcement of a judgment for possession, regardless of whether the tenant or subtenant was served with a prejudgment claim of right to possession, as specified. (3) Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a tenant or subtenant in possession of a rental housing unit at the time that property is sold in foreclosure to be provided 60 days' written notice to quit before the tenant or subtenant may be removed from the property, as specified. This bill would instead require a tenant or subtenant in possession of a rental housing unit under a month-to-month lease at the time that property is sold in foreclosure to be provided 90 days' written notice to quit before the tenant or subtenant may be removed from the property. The bill would provide tenants or subtenants holding possession of a rental housing unit under a fixed-term residential lease entered into before transfer of title at the foreclosure sale the right to possession until the end of the lease term, except in specified circumstances. The bill would also extend the operation of these provisions until December 31, 2019. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2610?
- AB 2610 is sponsored by Carter, Corbett, DeSaulnier, Hancock, Leno, Pavley, and Skinner.
- What is the current status of AB 2610?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2012. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2610?
- Track AB 2610 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2610
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2610
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →