State cash resources.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 82 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 82.
You're tracking SB 82
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 82 — State cash resources.
Last action — Consideration of Governor's item veto stricken from file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law, until September 1, 2011, provides for a cash management plan for the 2010–11 fiscal year to authorize the Controller, Treasurer, and Director of Finance to defer General Fund payments for up to 60 or 90 days, as specified, beginning July 2010, for specific entities, including county offices of education, public schools, and charter schools, subject to certain conditions. This bill would modify these provisions and apply the cash management plan to the 2011–12 fiscal year. This bill would also establish specified procedures for deferrals, and repayment of those deferrals, from county offices of education, public schools, and charter schools. The bill would make conforming changes and make these provisions inoperative on September 1, 2012. (2) Existing law establishes the Immediate and Critical Needs Account of the State Court Facilities Construction Fund and the Hospital Quality Assurance Revenue Fund for the planning, financing, and construction of court facilities and the support and enhancement of hospital quality, respectively. The bill would, notwithstanding existing law, authorize the Controller to use funds in the Immediate and Critical Needs Account and the Hospital Quality Assurance Revenue Fund for cashflow loans to the General Fund, as provided in specified provisions of law. (3) Existing law provides for the deferral of specified apportionments on a pro rata basis from the Highway Users Tax Account in the Transportation Tax Fund to cities, counties, and cities and counties from July 2010 to March 2011, inclusive, and limits the amount of those deferrals. Existing law permits cities, counties, and cities and counties to borrow certain designated funds from their accounts and requires that any borrowing be repaid with interest that would be applied to a specified purpose. The bill would repeal these provisions of law. (4) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. (5) This bill would appropriate the sum of $1,000 from the General Fund for administrative costs associated with this act. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute and a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 03/24/11 - Chaptered Current pdf March 24, 2011
- Enrolled 03/17/11 - Enrolled pdf March 17, 2011
- Amended 03/14/11 - Amended Assembly pdf March 14, 2011
- Introduced 01/10/11 - Introduced pdf January 10, 2011
- SB82 View text html
Action History
-
Consideration of Governor's item veto stricken from file.
-
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's item veto pending.
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 12, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor with item veto.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:50 p.m.
-
Enrolled measure version corrected.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 355.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Urgency clause adopted.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 54. Noes 23. Page 583.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 2. Page 167.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 10.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 22 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 54 | 23 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 29% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 2 | 0 | 13 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 22 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 5% | 0% | 37% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 82 do?
- (1) Existing law, until September 1, 2011, provides for a cash management plan for the 2010–11 fiscal year to authorize the Controller, Treasurer, and Director of Finance to defer General Fund payments for up to 60 or 90 days, as specified, beginning July 2010, for specific entities, including county offices of education, public schools, and charter schools, subject to certain conditions. This bill would modify these provisions and apply the cash management plan to the 2011–12 fiscal year. This bill would also establish specified procedures for deferrals, and repayment of those deferrals, from county offices of education, public schools, and charter schools. The bill would make conforming changes and make these provisions inoperative on September 1, 2012. (2) Existing law establishes the Immediate and Critical Needs Account of the State Court Facilities Construction Fund and the Hospital Quality Assurance Revenue Fund for the planning, financing, and construction of court facilities and the support and enhancement of hospital quality, respectively. The bill would, notwithstanding existing law, authorize the Controller to use funds in the Immediate and Critical Needs Account and the Hospital Quality Assurance Revenue Fund for cashflow loans to the General Fund, as provided in specified provisions of law. (3) Existing law provides for the deferral of specified apportionments on a pro rata basis from the Highway Users Tax Account in the Transportation Tax Fund to cities, counties, and cities and counties from July 2010 to March 2011, inclusive, and limits the amount of those deferrals. Existing law permits cities, counties, and cities and counties to borrow certain designated funds from their accounts and requires that any borrowing be repaid with interest that would be applied to a specified purpose. The bill would repeal these provisions of law. (4) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. (5) This bill would appropriate the sum of $1,000 from the General Fund for administrative costs associated with this act. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute and a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors SB 82?
- SB 82 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
- What is the current status of SB 82?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 82?
- Track SB 82 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 82
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 82
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →