AB 415 — Healing arts: telehealth.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 547, Statutes of 2011.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 9 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of various healing arts professions by various boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs. A violation of specified provisions is a crime. Existing law defines telemedicine, for the purpose of its regulation, to mean the practice of health care delivery, diagnosis, consultation, treatment, transfer of medical data, and education using interactive audio, video, or data communications. Existing law requires a health care practitioner, as defined, to obtain verbal and written informed consent from the patient or the patient's legal representative before telemedicine is delivered. Existing law also imposes various requirements with regard to the provision of telemedicine by health care service plans, health insurers, or under the Medi-Cal program, including a prohibition on requiring face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient for services appropriately provided through telemedicine, subject to certain contracts or policies. Existing federal regulations, for the purposes of participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, authorize the governing body of a hospital whose patients are receiving telemedicine services to grant privileges based on its medical staff recommendations that rely on information provided by the distant-site hospital. Existing state regulations require medical staff, appointed by the governing body of a hospital, to adopt procedures for the evaluation of staff applications for credentials and privileges. Existing law provides that health care service plans and health insurers shall not be required to pay for consultations provided by telephone or facsimile machines. Existing law provides that a willful violation of the provisions governing health care service plans is a crime. This bill would delete the provisions of state law regarding telemedicine as described above, and would instead set forth provisions relating to telehealth, as defined. This bill would require a health care provider, as defined, prior to the delivery of health care via telehealth, to verbally inform the patient that telehealth may be used and obtain verbal consent from the patient. This bill would provide that failure to comply with this provision constitutes unprofessional conduct. This bill would, subject to contract terms and conditions, also preclude health care service plans and health insurers from imposing prior to payment, certain requirements regarding the manner of service delivery. This bill would establish procedures for granting privileges to, and verifying and approving credentials for, providers of telehealth services. By changing the definition of a crime applicable to health care service plans, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law prohibits a requirement of face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient under the Medi-Cal program for services appropriately provided through telemedicine, subject to reimbursement policies developed by the Medi-Cal program to compensate licensed health care providers who provide health care services, that are otherwise covered by the Medi-Cal program, through telemedicine. This bill would, instead, prohibit a requirement of in-person contact between a health care provider and patient under the Medi-Cal program for any service otherwise covered by the Medi-Cal program when the service is appropriately provided by telehealth, as defined, and would make related changes. (3) Existing law, until January 1, 2013, and to the extent that federal financial participation is available, authorizes, under the Medi-Cal program, teleophthalmology and teledermatology by store and forward, as defined. This bill would delete the repeal of the above-described authorization. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/07/11 - Chaptered Current pdf October 07, 2011
- Enrolled 09/20/11 - Enrolled pdf September 20, 2011
- Amended 09/02/11 - Amended Senate pdf September 02, 2011
- Amended 08/15/11 - Amended Senate pdf August 15, 2011
- Amended 07/07/11 - Amended Senate pdf July 07, 2011
- Amended 05/27/11 - Amended Assembly pdf May 27, 2011
- Amended 05/10/11 - Amended Assembly pdf May 10, 2011
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 25, 2011
- Amended 03/31/11 - Amended Assembly pdf March 31, 2011
- Introduced 02/14/11 - Introduced pdf February 14, 2011
- AB415 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 547, Statutes of 2011.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3074.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 2355.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 25).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 6).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & E.D. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B., P. & E.D.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1723.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 3).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- V. Manuel Pérez · Cosponsor
- Chesbro · Cosponsor
- Galgiani · Cosponsor
- Logue · Primary
- Pan · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Logue
Co-sponsors (4)
- V. Manuel Pérez
- Chesbro
- Galgiani
- Pan
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 76 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Not Voting |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| De León | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 73 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 84% | 0% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 415 do?
- (1) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of various healing arts professions by various boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs. A violation of specified provisions is a crime. Existing law defines telemedicine, for the purpose of its regulation, to mean the practice of health care delivery, diagnosis, consultation, treatment, transfer of medical data, and education using interactive audio, video, or data communications. Existing law requires a health care practitioner, as defined, to obtain verbal and written informed consent from the patient or the patient's legal representative before telemedicine is delivered. Existing law also imposes various requirements with regard to the provision of telemedicine by health care service plans, health insurers, or under the Medi-Cal program, including a prohibition on requiring face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient for services appropriately provided through telemedicine, subject to certain contracts or policies. Existing federal regulations, for the purposes of participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, authorize the governing body of a hospital whose patients are receiving telemedicine services to grant privileges based on its medical staff recommendations that rely on information provided by the distant-site hospital. Existing state regulations require medical staff, appointed by the governing body of a hospital, to adopt procedures for the evaluation of staff applications for credentials and privileges. Existing law provides that health care service plans and health insurers shall not be required to pay for consultations provided by telephone or facsimile machines. Existing law provides that a willful violation of the provisions governing health care service plans is a crime. This bill would delete the provisions of state law regarding telemedicine as described above, and would instead set forth provisions relating to telehealth, as defined. This bill would require a health care provider, as defined, prior to the delivery of health care via telehealth, to verbally inform the patient that telehealth may be used and obtain verbal consent from the patient. This bill would provide that failure to comply with this provision constitutes unprofessional conduct. This bill would, subject to contract terms and conditions, also preclude health care service plans and health insurers from imposing prior to payment, certain requirements regarding the manner of service delivery. This bill would establish procedures for granting privileges to, and verifying and approving credentials for, providers of telehealth services. By changing the definition of a crime applicable to health care service plans, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law prohibits a requirement of face-to-face contact between a health care provider and a patient under the Medi-Cal program for services appropriately provided through telemedicine, subject to reimbursement policies developed by the Medi-Cal program to compensate licensed health care providers who provide health care services, that are otherwise covered by the Medi-Cal program, through telemedicine. This bill would, instead, prohibit a requirement of in-person contact between a health care provider and patient under the Medi-Cal program for any service otherwise covered by the Medi-Cal program when the service is appropriately provided by telehealth, as defined, and would make related changes. (3) Existing law, until January 1, 2013, and to the extent that federal financial participation is available, authorizes, under the Medi-Cal program, teleophthalmology and teledermatology by store and forward, as defined. This bill would delete the repeal of the above-described authorization. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 415?
- AB 415 is sponsored by V. Manuel Pérez, Chesbro, Galgiani, Logue, and Pan.
- What is the current status of AB 415?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 415?
- Track AB 415 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 415
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 415
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →