Surface mining: determinations: appeals.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1609 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1609.
You're tracking AB 1609
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1609 — Surface mining: determinations: appeals.
Last action — In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975, prohibits, with certain exceptions, a person from conducting a surface mining operation unless, among other things, a reclamation plan has been submitted to and approved by the lead agency, as defined, for the operation. The act requires the owner or operator of a mining operation to submit an annual report containing information regarding the operation. For purposes of compliance with specified provisions of the Public Contract Code, the act requires the Department of Conservation to, at a minimum, quarterly publish in the California Regulatory Notice Register, or otherwise make available, upon request, to the Department of General Services or any other state or local agency, a list identifying surface mining operations that have submitted the annual report and it indicates compliance with specified standards, guidelines, and requirements or that there is a pending appeal. This bill would require the department to give notice by personal service or certified mail to a surface mining operation that it determines shall not be included in the above-described list or shall be removed from the above-described list. The bill would specify that the surface mining operation shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of service within which to file an appeal of the department's determination with the State Board of Mining and Geology. The bill would require that an appeal be scheduled and heard at a public hearing within 60 days from the date the appeal is filed, or a longer time if mutually agreed upon by the board and the appellant. The bill would require that when a timely appeal is filed on behalf of a surface mining operation pursuant to the provisions of the bill, the operation shall remain on the list pending the final outcome of the appeal, if the appeal has not been pending for more than 180 days. The bill would require the board to deny a request for an appeal of a notice issued pursuant to those provisions if either (1) the notice alleges one or more violations of the act that the board determines to be ministerial in nature and not constituting a substantial violation, in which case the appellant would have 30 days to correct the violation and achieve compliance, or (2) the specific claims asserted in the notice have been adjudicated, or are pending adjudication before the board or a lead agency in a separate action authorized by the act. The bill would prescribe requirements for the review of information and evidence pertaining to the appeal, as specified. The bill would authorize the board, by regulation, to establish procedures for declining to hear appeals that it determines raise only ministerial issues.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/25/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 25, 2012
- Amended 04/25/12 - Amended Assembly pdf April 25, 2012
- Introduced 02/07/12 - Introduced pdf February 07, 2012
- AB1609 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 5109.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 25).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 16).
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 9.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Lara · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Lara
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 75 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1609 do?
- Existing law, the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975, prohibits, with certain exceptions, a person from conducting a surface mining operation unless, among other things, a reclamation plan has been submitted to and approved by the lead agency, as defined, for the operation. The act requires the owner or operator of a mining operation to submit an annual report containing information regarding the operation. For purposes of compliance with specified provisions of the Public Contract Code, the act requires the Department of Conservation to, at a minimum, quarterly publish in the California Regulatory Notice Register, or otherwise make available, upon request, to the Department of General Services or any other state or local agency, a list identifying surface mining operations that have submitted the annual report and it indicates compliance with specified standards, guidelines, and requirements or that there is a pending appeal. This bill would require the department to give notice by personal service or certified mail to a surface mining operation that it determines shall not be included in the above-described list or shall be removed from the above-described list. The bill would specify that the surface mining operation shall have 30 days from the date of receipt of service within which to file an appeal of the department's determination with the State Board of Mining and Geology. The bill would require that an appeal be scheduled and heard at a public hearing within 60 days from the date the appeal is filed, or a longer time if mutually agreed upon by the board and the appellant. The bill would require that when a timely appeal is filed on behalf of a surface mining operation pursuant to the provisions of the bill, the operation shall remain on the list pending the final outcome of the appeal, if the appeal has not been pending for more than 180 days. The bill would require the board to deny a request for an appeal of a notice issued pursuant to those provisions if either (1) the notice alleges one or more violations of the act that the board determines to be ministerial in nature and not constituting a substantial violation, in which case the appellant would have 30 days to correct the violation and achieve compliance, or (2) the specific claims asserted in the notice have been adjudicated, or are pending adjudication before the board or a lead agency in a separate action authorized by the act. The bill would prescribe requirements for the review of information and evidence pertaining to the appeal, as specified. The bill would authorize the board, by regulation, to establish procedures for declining to hear appeals that it determines raise only ministerial issues.
- Who sponsors AB 1609?
- AB 1609 is sponsored by Lara.
- What is the current status of AB 1609?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1609?
- Track AB 1609 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1609
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1609
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →