Medi-Cal: eligibility.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 677 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 677.
You're tracking SB 677
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 677 — Medi-Cal: eligibility.
Last action — Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2014, implement various provisions of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act) (Public Law 111-148) , as amended, by, among other things, modifying provisions relating to determining eligibility for certain eligibility groups. The bill would, in this regard, extend Medi-Cal eligibility to specified adults and would require that income eligibility be determined based on modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) , as prescribed. The bill would prohibit the use of an asset or resources test for individuals whose financial eligibility for Medi-Cal is determined based on the application of MAGI. The bill would also add, commencing January 1, 2014, benefits, services, and coverage included in the essential health benefits package, as adopted by the state and approved by the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, to the schedule of Medi-Cal benefits. Because counties are required to make Medi-Cal eligibility determinations and this bill would expand Medi-Cal eligibility, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/24/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 24, 2012
- Amended 05/23/11 - Amended Senate pdf May 23, 2011
- Amended 03/22/11 - Amended Senate pdf March 22, 2011
- Introduced 02/18/11 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2011
- SB677 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. (Page 6252.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 16).
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 13. Page 2719.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 2686.) (January 19).
-
Set for hearing January 19.
-
Held in committee and under submission.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 26.
-
Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 9.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 786.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hernandez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hernandez
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 32% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 12 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 13 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 33% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| De León | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 677 do?
- Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2014, implement various provisions of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act) (Public Law 111-148) , as amended, by, among other things, modifying provisions relating to determining eligibility for certain eligibility groups. The bill would, in this regard, extend Medi-Cal eligibility to specified adults and would require that income eligibility be determined based on modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) , as prescribed. The bill would prohibit the use of an asset or resources test for individuals whose financial eligibility for Medi-Cal is determined based on the application of MAGI. The bill would also add, commencing January 1, 2014, benefits, services, and coverage included in the essential health benefits package, as adopted by the state and approved by the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, to the schedule of Medi-Cal benefits. Because counties are required to make Medi-Cal eligibility determinations and this bill would expand Medi-Cal eligibility, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 677?
- SB 677 is sponsored by Hernandez.
- What is the current status of SB 677?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 677?
- Track SB 677 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 677
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 677
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →