California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 911 — Police protection districts.

Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provided, until October 1, 1959, for the formation and administration of police protection districts in unincorporated towns, and provides for the continuation of police protection districts formed prior to that date. Existing law provides that a police protection district is to be governed by a district board consisting of 3 elected commissioners. Existing law further provides that a police protection district's police department, its chief of police, and its employees shall have all the rights, duties, privileges, immunities, obligations, and powers of a municipal police department. This bill would grant police protection districts additional powers, including, but not limited to, the ability to adopt rules, regulations, and ordinances, as specified. This bill would specify that a violation of any rule, regulation, or ordinance adopted by a board of police commissioners would be a misdemeanor. The bill would authorize a district to charge a fee to cover the cost of any service that the district provides or the cost of enforcing any regulation for which the fee is charged, as specified.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  3. Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and PUB. S.

  4. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1550.)

  6. Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1434.)

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (May 3).

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  10. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  12. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  13. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and PUB. S.

  14. From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.

  15. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Ma · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Ma

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 911 MA Assembly Third Reading

Passed 75 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1001
Unaffiliated 73004
Democratic 1000
Total 75005
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Butler — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Fong — Yea
Allen — Yea
Carter — Yea
Conway — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Cook — Yea
Logue — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Beall — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Lara — Yea
Campos — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Davis — Not Voting
Donnelly — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Norby — Yea
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 5 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5002
Total 5002
% of votes cast 71%0%0%29%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Not Voting
Mitchell — Yea
Hill — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Knight — Not Voting
Skinner — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 911 do?
Existing law provided, until October 1, 1959, for the formation and administration of police protection districts in unincorporated towns, and provides for the continuation of police protection districts formed prior to that date. Existing law provides that a police protection district is to be governed by a district board consisting of 3 elected commissioners. Existing law further provides that a police protection district's police department, its chief of police, and its employees shall have all the rights, duties, privileges, immunities, obligations, and powers of a municipal police department. This bill would grant police protection districts additional powers, including, but not limited to, the ability to adopt rules, regulations, and ordinances, as specified. This bill would specify that a violation of any rule, regulation, or ordinance adopted by a board of police commissioners would be a misdemeanor. The bill would authorize a district to charge a fee to cover the cost of any service that the district provides or the cost of enforcing any regulation for which the fee is charged, as specified.
Who sponsors AB 911?
AB 911 is sponsored by Ma.
What is the current status of AB 911?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 911?
Track AB 911 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 911

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 911

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →