Redevelopment plans: environmental goals.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 343 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 343.
You're tracking AB 343
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 343 — Redevelopment plans: environmental goals.
Last action — In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes the establishment of redevelopment agencies in communities in order to address the effects of blight, as defined, in those communities and requires those agencies to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and approve a redevelopment plan for each project area. Existing law requires, among other things, that each redevelopment plan be consistent with the community's general plan. Existing law requires each transportation planning agency, as specified, to prepare and adopt a regional transportation plan directed at achieving coordinated and balanced regional transportation systems. Existing law requires that the regional transportation plan include, among other things, a sustainable communities strategy, as specified. Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to provide affected regions with certain greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. Existing law requires that the sustainable communities strategy set forth a forecasted development plan aimed at meeting the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets established by the State Air Resources Board. Existing law, in the case where a sustainable communities strategy is unable to meet the greenhouse gas reduction targets, requires the responsible metropolitan planning organization to prepare an alternative planning strategy showing how those targets would be achieved through alternative development. This bill would require each redevelopment plan to be consistent with the regional sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy adopted by the metropolitan planning organization or council of government.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/14/11 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 14, 2011
- Introduced 02/10/11 - Introduced pdf February 10, 2011
- AB343 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and E.Q.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 53. Noes 25. Page 1511.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (May 11).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Atkins · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Atkins
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 52 | 23 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 53 | 25 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 31% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 343 do?
- The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes the establishment of redevelopment agencies in communities in order to address the effects of blight, as defined, in those communities and requires those agencies to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and approve a redevelopment plan for each project area. Existing law requires, among other things, that each redevelopment plan be consistent with the community's general plan. Existing law requires each transportation planning agency, as specified, to prepare and adopt a regional transportation plan directed at achieving coordinated and balanced regional transportation systems. Existing law requires that the regional transportation plan include, among other things, a sustainable communities strategy, as specified. Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to provide affected regions with certain greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. Existing law requires that the sustainable communities strategy set forth a forecasted development plan aimed at meeting the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets established by the State Air Resources Board. Existing law, in the case where a sustainable communities strategy is unable to meet the greenhouse gas reduction targets, requires the responsible metropolitan planning organization to prepare an alternative planning strategy showing how those targets would be achieved through alternative development. This bill would require each redevelopment plan to be consistent with the regional sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy adopted by the metropolitan planning organization or council of government.
- Who sponsors AB 343?
- AB 343 is sponsored by Atkins.
- What is the current status of AB 343?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 343?
- Track AB 343 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 343
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 343
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →