California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 1032 — Public safety.

Last action — From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires each party demanding a jury trial to deposit advance jury fees in the amount of $150 with the clerk or judge. Existing law requires the court to transmit the advance jury fees to the State Treasury for deposit in the Trial Court Trust Fund within 45 calendar days after the end of the month in which the advance jury fees are deposited with the court. This bill would instead require that at least one party demanding a jury on each side of a civil case pay a nonrefundable fee of $150, unless the fee has been paid by another party on the same side of the case. The bill would make that fee due on or before the date scheduled for the initial case management conference in the action, except in specified circumstances. The bill would make related and conforming changes to those provisions. Existing law authorizes the juvenile court to retain jurisdiction over a ward of the court, until the ward attains 21 years of age, except in certain circumstances. Existing law further authorizes the court to retain jurisdiction over a ward who has committed specified serious offenses or other offenses requiring registration as a sex offender, until age 25, if committed to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Facilities, or to a state hospital or mental health facility. Existing law also requires, on and after July 1, 2012, every person committed by the juvenile court to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Facilities, by reason of committing specified offenses, to be discharged after a 2-year period of control, or when that person reaches 23 years of age, whichever occurs later, except as specified. This bill would remove specified offenses requiring registration as a sex offender from those provisions that allow the court, in certain circumstances, to retain jurisdiction over a ward until that person attains either 25 years of age or 23 years of age. The bill would state that these changes apply retroactively. Existing law authorizes the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to develop and implement a system of graduated sanctions for wards that distinguishes between minor, intermediate, and serious misconduct. Existing law further requires the department to promulgate regulations to implement a table of sanctions to be used in determining discharge consideration date extensions. Existing law also authorizes the department to extend a ward's discharge consideration date, subject to appeal, to not more than 12 months, for a sustained serious misconduct violation if all other sanctioning options have been considered and determined to be unsuitable in light of the previous case history and circumstances of the misconduct. This bill would delete the above provision requiring the department to promulgate regulations to implement a table of sanctions, in certain circumstances. The bill would also revise the above provision regarding a ward's discharge to instead prohibit the department from extending a ward's discharge consideration date for incidents occurring after September 1, 2012. The bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for administration. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  2. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  3. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  4. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 10. Page 2982.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  5. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  6. Ordered to second reading.

  7. Withdrawn from committee. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 2916.)

  8. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  9. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 8.

  10. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading SB1032 Committee on B. & F.R.

Passed 23 Yea · 10 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211006
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 231007
% of votes cast 58%25%0%18%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Evans — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Harman — Nay
Huff — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Corbett — Not Voting
Dutton — Nay
Leno — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Nay
Hernandez — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1032 do?
Existing law requires each party demanding a jury trial to deposit advance jury fees in the amount of $150 with the clerk or judge. Existing law requires the court to transmit the advance jury fees to the State Treasury for deposit in the Trial Court Trust Fund within 45 calendar days after the end of the month in which the advance jury fees are deposited with the court. This bill would instead require that at least one party demanding a jury on each side of a civil case pay a nonrefundable fee of $150, unless the fee has been paid by another party on the same side of the case. The bill would make that fee due on or before the date scheduled for the initial case management conference in the action, except in specified circumstances. The bill would make related and conforming changes to those provisions. Existing law authorizes the juvenile court to retain jurisdiction over a ward of the court, until the ward attains 21 years of age, except in certain circumstances. Existing law further authorizes the court to retain jurisdiction over a ward who has committed specified serious offenses or other offenses requiring registration as a sex offender, until age 25, if committed to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Facilities, or to a state hospital or mental health facility. Existing law also requires, on and after July 1, 2012, every person committed by the juvenile court to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Facilities, by reason of committing specified offenses, to be discharged after a 2-year period of control, or when that person reaches 23 years of age, whichever occurs later, except as specified. This bill would remove specified offenses requiring registration as a sex offender from those provisions that allow the court, in certain circumstances, to retain jurisdiction over a ward until that person attains either 25 years of age or 23 years of age. The bill would state that these changes apply retroactively. Existing law authorizes the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to develop and implement a system of graduated sanctions for wards that distinguishes between minor, intermediate, and serious misconduct. Existing law further requires the department to promulgate regulations to implement a table of sanctions to be used in determining discharge consideration date extensions. Existing law also authorizes the department to extend a ward's discharge consideration date, subject to appeal, to not more than 12 months, for a sustained serious misconduct violation if all other sanctioning options have been considered and determined to be unsuitable in light of the previous case history and circumstances of the misconduct. This bill would delete the above provision requiring the department to promulgate regulations to implement a table of sanctions, in certain circumstances. The bill would also revise the above provision regarding a ward's discharge to instead prohibit the department from extending a ward's discharge consideration date for incidents occurring after September 1, 2012. The bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for administration. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors SB 1032?
SB 1032 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 1032?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1032?
Track SB 1032 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1032

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1032

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →