California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 1714 — In-home supportive services: providers.

Last action — In committee: Set second hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons receive services enabling them to remain in their own homes. Existing law prohibits a new applicant or an applicant whose application has been denied on the basis of a conviction and for whom an appeal of that denial is pending from providing supportive services if he or she has been convicted of specified crimes in the previous 10 years. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services and the State Department of Health Care Services to develop a provider enrollment form that each person seeking to provide supportive services must complete, sign under penalty of perjury, and submit to the county, containing designated statements relating to the provider's criminal history. Existing law authorizes a recipient of services who wishes to employ a provider applicant who has been convicted of a specified offense to submit to the county a prescribed individual waiver, signed by the recipient, or by the recipient's authorized representative. This bill would add the felony offenses of forgery, embezzlement, extortion, and identity theft to the list of criminal convictions that would preclude an applicant from providing supportive services. The bill would require the State Department of Social Services to revise the provider enrollment form to account for these additional criminal exclusions. By changing the definition of the crime of perjury, and by increasing the duties of counties in administering the In-Home Supportive Services program, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Set second hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  2. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  3. Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and PUB. S.

  4. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 45. Noes 10. Page 4812.)

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 6.) (April 18).

  8. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  9. Read second time and amended.

  10. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (March 20).

  11. Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  12. From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.

  13. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Halderman · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Halderman

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 1714 HALDERMAN Assembly Third Reading

Passed 45 Yea · 10 Nay · 25 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4210025
Republican 2000
Democratic 1000
Total 4510025
% of votes cast 56%13%0%31%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Garrick — Yea
Carter — Yea
Gorell — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Huber — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Logue — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Butler — Not Voting
Bonilla — Yea
Furutani — Nay
Campos — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Galgiani — Yea
Gordon — Not Voting
Fong — Not Voting
Allen — Not Voting
Halderman — Yea
John A. Pérez — Not Voting
Hall — Not Voting
Fletcher — Not Voting
Hayashi — Nay
Hueso — Not Voting
Jeffries — Yea
Atkins — Not Voting
Chesbro — Not Voting
Ammiano — Nay
Beall — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
Donnelly — Yea
Ma — Not Voting
Mendoza — Nay
Monning — Nay
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Norby — Yea
Perea — Not Voting
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Nay
Swanson — Nay
Valadao — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Nay
Williams — Not Voting
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Not Voting
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Not Voting
Brownley — Not Voting
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Nay
Mansoor — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Pan — Not Voting
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Eng — Not Voting
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Not Voting
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 9 Yea · 6 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8602
Democratic 1000
Total 9602
% of votes cast 53%35%0%12%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Mitchell — Nay
Gatto — Nay
Campos — Not Voting
Hall — Nay
Hill — Nay
Donnelly — Yea
Lara — Nay
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Nay
Davis — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety healthcare labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1714 do?
Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons receive services enabling them to remain in their own homes. Existing law prohibits a new applicant or an applicant whose application has been denied on the basis of a conviction and for whom an appeal of that denial is pending from providing supportive services if he or she has been convicted of specified crimes in the previous 10 years. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services and the State Department of Health Care Services to develop a provider enrollment form that each person seeking to provide supportive services must complete, sign under penalty of perjury, and submit to the county, containing designated statements relating to the provider's criminal history. Existing law authorizes a recipient of services who wishes to employ a provider applicant who has been convicted of a specified offense to submit to the county a prescribed individual waiver, signed by the recipient, or by the recipient's authorized representative. This bill would add the felony offenses of forgery, embezzlement, extortion, and identity theft to the list of criminal convictions that would preclude an applicant from providing supportive services. The bill would require the State Department of Social Services to revise the provider enrollment form to account for these additional criminal exclusions. By changing the definition of the crime of perjury, and by increasing the duties of counties in administering the In-Home Supportive Services program, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors AB 1714?
AB 1714 is sponsored by Halderman.
What is the current status of AB 1714?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1714?
Track AB 1714 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1714

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1714

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →