California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 680 — Pupil safety: comprehensive school safety plans.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 438, Statutes of 2011.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law provides that school districts and county offices of education are responsible for the overall development of a comprehensive school safety plan for each of their constituent schools. Existing law requires the schoolsite council of a school to write and develop a comprehensive school safety plan relevant to the needs and resources of the particular school. Existing law requires a schoolsite council or school safety planning committee, before adopting a comprehensive school safety plan, to hold a public meeting at the schoolsite, as specified. Existing law requires schools to forward copies of their comprehensive school safety plans to the school district or county office of education for approval. Existing law requires school districts and county offices of education annually to notify the State Department of Education regarding schools that fail to adopt a comprehensive school safety plan. This bill would authorize school districts and county offices of education, in consultation with law enforcement officials, to elect not to have their schoolsite councils develop and write those portions of their comprehensive school safety plans that include tactical responses to criminal incidents, as defined, that may result in death or serious bodily injury at the schoolsite. The bill would authorize school district and county office of education administrators to develop those portions of a comprehensive school safety plan that include tactical responses to criminal incidents, in consultation with law enforcement officials and representatives of exclusive bargaining units of employees of that school district or county office of education, and to elect not to disclose these portions of the comprehensive school safety plan that include tactical responses to criminal incidents. The bill would specify that it would not preclude the governing board of a school district or county office of education from conferring in a closed session with law enforcement officials to approve a tactical response plan developed in consultation with those officials pursuant to the bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 438, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2967.).

  5. From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (September 6).

  6. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 2885.)

  7. Re-referred to Com. on ED. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  8. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  9. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 32. Noes 5. Page 2167.).

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  12. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  13. Ordered to second reading.

  14. Withdrawn from committee.

  15. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  16. Withdrawn from committee.

  17. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.

  18. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on E. & C.A. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 29).

  19. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.

  20. In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  21. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  22. Referred to Coms. on ED. and E. & C.A.

  23. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  24. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1509.)

  25. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  26. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 18).

  27. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  28. Read second time and amended.

  29. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 3).

  30. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E. & R. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.

  31. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

  32. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. Read second time and amended.

  33. Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and E. & R.

  34. From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.

  35. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Block · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Block

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 680 BLOCK Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 76 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 73004
Republican 2000
Democratic 1000
Total 76004
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Butler — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Carter — Yea
Fong — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cook — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Conway — Yea
Logue — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Yea
Campos — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Not Voting
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Yea
Pan — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

amendments be concurred in.

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Butler — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Norby — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eng — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB680 Block By Liu

Passed 32 Yea · 5 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 29503
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 32503
% of votes cast 80%13%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Evans — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Fuller — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Harman — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

AB 680 BLOCK Assembly Third Reading

Passed 75 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 72005
Republican 2000
Democratic 1000
Total 75005
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Not Voting
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Butler — Yea
Eng — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Carter — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Fong — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Logue — Yea
Allen — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Conway — Yea
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Furutani — Not Voting
Gordon — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Halderman — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Campos — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Not Voting
Donnelly — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Norby — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Williams — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16000
Democratic 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Lara — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Donnelly — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 680 do?
Existing law provides that school districts and county offices of education are responsible for the overall development of a comprehensive school safety plan for each of their constituent schools. Existing law requires the schoolsite council of a school to write and develop a comprehensive school safety plan relevant to the needs and resources of the particular school. Existing law requires a schoolsite council or school safety planning committee, before adopting a comprehensive school safety plan, to hold a public meeting at the schoolsite, as specified. Existing law requires schools to forward copies of their comprehensive school safety plans to the school district or county office of education for approval. Existing law requires school districts and county offices of education annually to notify the State Department of Education regarding schools that fail to adopt a comprehensive school safety plan. This bill would authorize school districts and county offices of education, in consultation with law enforcement officials, to elect not to have their schoolsite councils develop and write those portions of their comprehensive school safety plans that include tactical responses to criminal incidents, as defined, that may result in death or serious bodily injury at the schoolsite. The bill would authorize school district and county office of education administrators to develop those portions of a comprehensive school safety plan that include tactical responses to criminal incidents, in consultation with law enforcement officials and representatives of exclusive bargaining units of employees of that school district or county office of education, and to elect not to disclose these portions of the comprehensive school safety plan that include tactical responses to criminal incidents. The bill would specify that it would not preclude the governing board of a school district or county office of education from conferring in a closed session with law enforcement officials to approve a tactical response plan developed in consultation with those officials pursuant to the bill.
Who sponsors AB 680?
AB 680 is sponsored by Block.
What is the current status of AB 680?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 680?
Track AB 680 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 680

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 680

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →