Charter schools: funding.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1811 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1811.
You're tracking AB 1811
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1811 — Charter schools: funding.
Last action — Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law states the intent of the Legislature that each charter school be provided with operational funding that is equal to the total funding that would be available to a similar school district serving a similar pupil population, and requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to annually compute a general-purpose entitlement, funded from a combination of state aid and local funds for each charter school. Existing law requires revenue limit funding that is computed in the general-purpose entitlement to be based on the statewide average revenue limit funding per unit of average daily attendance received by elementary, unified, and high school districts, as specified. Existing law requires that the general-purpose entitlement for certain conversion charter schools to be determined, instead, based on the amount of the actual unrestricted revenues expended per unit of average daily attendance for that school in the year before its conversion to, and operation as, a charter school, adjusted as specified, and for subsequent fiscal years, based on the prior year allocation, adjusted as specified, including for any state general-purpose increases. This bill, commencing with the 2013–14 fiscal year, would require the general-purpose entitlement of a charter high school that is established on or after January 1, 2013, through the conversion of an existing public high school within a unified school district to be equal, for the first 3 years of operation, to the current year base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance of the sponsoring unified school district, adjusted as specified. Commencing with the 4th year of operation, the bill would require the charter school to generate general-purpose funding based on the statewide average revenue limit funding per unit of average daily attendance received by high school districts. These provisions would become inoperative either on July 1, 2018, and repealed on January 1, 2019, or on the effective date of a measure enacting comprehensive school finance reform, whichever occurs first.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/11/12 - Enrolled Current pdf September 11, 2012
- Amended 08/24/12 - Amended Senate pdf August 24, 2012
- Amended 07/02/12 - Amended Senate pdf July 02, 2012
- Amended 06/12/12 - Amended Senate pdf June 12, 2012
- Amended 05/03/12 - Amended Assembly pdf May 03, 2012
- Amended 04/10/12 - Amended Assembly pdf April 10, 2012
- Amended 03/05/12 - Amended Assembly pdf March 05, 2012
- Introduced 02/21/12 - Introduced pdf February 21, 2012
- AB1811 View text html
Action History
-
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 28. Page 6679.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6605.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 24. Noes 10. Page 4929.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (June 20).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 24. Page 4773.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 2).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (March 28).
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bonilla · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bonilla
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 26 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 51 | 28 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 35% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 25% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 10% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 22 | 0 | 7 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 48 | 24 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 30% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1811 do?
- Existing law states the intent of the Legislature that each charter school be provided with operational funding that is equal to the total funding that would be available to a similar school district serving a similar pupil population, and requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to annually compute a general-purpose entitlement, funded from a combination of state aid and local funds for each charter school. Existing law requires revenue limit funding that is computed in the general-purpose entitlement to be based on the statewide average revenue limit funding per unit of average daily attendance received by elementary, unified, and high school districts, as specified. Existing law requires that the general-purpose entitlement for certain conversion charter schools to be determined, instead, based on the amount of the actual unrestricted revenues expended per unit of average daily attendance for that school in the year before its conversion to, and operation as, a charter school, adjusted as specified, and for subsequent fiscal years, based on the prior year allocation, adjusted as specified, including for any state general-purpose increases. This bill, commencing with the 2013–14 fiscal year, would require the general-purpose entitlement of a charter high school that is established on or after January 1, 2013, through the conversion of an existing public high school within a unified school district to be equal, for the first 3 years of operation, to the current year base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance of the sponsoring unified school district, adjusted as specified. Commencing with the 4th year of operation, the bill would require the charter school to generate general-purpose funding based on the statewide average revenue limit funding per unit of average daily attendance received by high school districts. These provisions would become inoperative either on July 1, 2018, and repealed on January 1, 2019, or on the effective date of a measure enacting comprehensive school finance reform, whichever occurs first.
- Who sponsors AB 1811?
- AB 1811 is sponsored by Bonilla.
- What is the current status of AB 1811?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1811?
- Track AB 1811 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1811
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1811
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →