Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: Delta Plan: conveyance facility.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 250 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 250.
You're tracking SB 250
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 250 — Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: Delta Plan: conveyance facility.
Last action — Hearing postponed by committee.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law imposes requirements on the Department of Water Resources in connection with the preparation of a Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) . The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009 requires the Delta Stewardship Council to consider the BDCP for inclusion in a specified Delta Plan, and requires the incorporation of the BDCP into the Delta Plan if the BDCP meets certain requirements, including a requirement that the BDCP include a comprehensive review and analysis of a range of Delta conveyance alternatives, including through-Delta, dual conveyance, and isolated conveyance alternatives and capacity and design options of specified canals and pipelines. This bill would require that the department's development of certain Delta conveyance facilities be completed on or before February 15, 2013, and would require that the construction of those facilities be completed by December 31, 2025.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/29/11 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 29, 2011
- Amended 04/25/11 - Amended Senate pdf April 25, 2011
- Amended 03/15/11 - Amended Senate pdf March 15, 2011
- Introduced 02/10/11 - Introduced pdf February 10, 2011
- SB250 View text html
Action History
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 10). Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 1. Page 986.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 854.) (May 2). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
-
Set for hearing May 2.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on E.Q. and JUD.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 13.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Susan Rubio · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Rubio, Susan Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 3% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 250 do?
- Existing law imposes requirements on the Department of Water Resources in connection with the preparation of a Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) . The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009 requires the Delta Stewardship Council to consider the BDCP for inclusion in a specified Delta Plan, and requires the incorporation of the BDCP into the Delta Plan if the BDCP meets certain requirements, including a requirement that the BDCP include a comprehensive review and analysis of a range of Delta conveyance alternatives, including through-Delta, dual conveyance, and isolated conveyance alternatives and capacity and design options of specified canals and pipelines. This bill would require that the department's development of certain Delta conveyance facilities be completed on or before February 15, 2013, and would require that the construction of those facilities be completed by December 31, 2025.
- Who sponsors SB 250?
- SB 250 is sponsored by Rubio, Susan (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 250?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 250?
- Track SB 250 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 250
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 250
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →