California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 81 — Budget Act of 2011.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 2, Statutes of 2012.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Under existing law, the amount of revenue that a district may collect annually for general purposes, called a revenue limit, is calculated in accordance with various statutory formulas. A basic aid school district is a school district where property tax revenues exceed the revenue limit and the district consequently does not receive a state apportionment. Existing law also expresses legislative intent that basic aid school districts assume categorical funding reductions proportionate to the revenue limit reductions implemented for nonbasic aid school districts in the 2008–09 and 2009–10 fiscal years. Existing law requires calculations to implement the funding reductions, including, in specified circumstances, subtracting an amount determined by multiplying each district's 2011–12 fiscal year total revenue limit, subject to a specified deficit factor and calculated as specified, by 8.92%. This bill would instead require each district's 2011–12 fiscal year total revenue limit to be multiplied by 9.57%. (2) Existing law requires a revenue limit to be calculated for each county superintendent of schools, adjusted for various factors, and reduced, as specified. Existing law reduces the revenue limit for each county superintendent of schools for the 2011–12 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 20.041%. This bill would instead set the deficit factor for each county superintendent of schools for the 2011–12 fiscal year at 20.691%. (3) Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to determine a revenue limit for each school district in the county and requires the amount of the revenue limit to be adjusted for various factors. Existing law reduces the revenue limit for each school district for the 2011–12 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 19.754%. This bill would instead set the deficit factor for each school district for the 2011–12 fiscal year at 20.404%. (4) Existing law authorized the Director of Finance to make reductions to certain appropriations in the Budget Act of 2011 if the higher of 2 specified revenue forecasts for the 2011–12 fiscal year was less one or both of 2 specified sums. Pursuant to this provision, the Director of Finance is required to reduce the appropriation for home-to-school transportation and small school district transportation that was included in the Budget Act of 2011 by up to $248,000,000. This bill would make an appropriation of $248,000,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Education, for transfer to Section A of the State School Fund, to restore any funding for home-to-school transportation and small school district transportation for the 2011–12 fiscal year reduced pursuant to this authority. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 2, Statutes of 2012.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:30 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 26. Noes 8. Page 2760.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 2765.)

  6. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 2759.) Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  7. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.

  8. In Senate.

  9. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 60. Noes 8. Page 3677.) Ordered to the Senate.

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 20. Noes 5.) (January 31).

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  15. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  16. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  17. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 2. Page 167.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  18. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  19. Ordered to second reading.

  20. Withdrawn from committee.

  21. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  22. From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 10.

  23. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12004
Total 12004
% of votes cast 75%0%0%25%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Huff — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Liu — Not Voting
Emmerson — Not Voting
La Malfa — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 60 Yea · 8 Nay · 12 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 598010
Republican 1001
Democratic 0001
Total 608012
% of votes cast 75%10%0%15%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Nay
Carter — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Morrell — Not Voting
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fong — Yea
Butler — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Allen — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hagman — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Jeffries — Not Voting
Bonilla — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
Donnelly — Yea
Knight — Nay
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Not Voting
Norby — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Not Voting
Wagner — Nay
Williams — Yea
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lara — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nielsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Not Voting
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Galgiani — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 26 Yea · 8 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 24706
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 26806
% of votes cast 65%20%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cannella — Yea
Evans — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Corbett — Yea
De León — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Harman — Nay
Rubio — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Dutton — Nay
Lieu — Not Voting
Pavley — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Nay
Emmerson — Not Voting
Correa — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 20 Yea · 5 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 19502
Republican 1000
Total 20502
% of votes cast 74%19%0%7%
How each member voted (27)
Member Party Vote
Gordon — Yea
Butler — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bonilla — Not Voting
Huffman — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Not Voting
Alejo — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 22 Yea · 2 Nay · 14 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 202013
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 222014
% of votes cast 58%5%0%37%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Evans — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Huff — Not Voting
Price — Not Voting
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 81 do?
(1) Under existing law, the amount of revenue that a district may collect annually for general purposes, called a revenue limit, is calculated in accordance with various statutory formulas. A basic aid school district is a school district where property tax revenues exceed the revenue limit and the district consequently does not receive a state apportionment. Existing law also expresses legislative intent that basic aid school districts assume categorical funding reductions proportionate to the revenue limit reductions implemented for nonbasic aid school districts in the 2008–09 and 2009–10 fiscal years. Existing law requires calculations to implement the funding reductions, including, in specified circumstances, subtracting an amount determined by multiplying each district's 2011–12 fiscal year total revenue limit, subject to a specified deficit factor and calculated as specified, by 8.92%. This bill would instead require each district's 2011–12 fiscal year total revenue limit to be multiplied by 9.57%. (2) Existing law requires a revenue limit to be calculated for each county superintendent of schools, adjusted for various factors, and reduced, as specified. Existing law reduces the revenue limit for each county superintendent of schools for the 2011–12 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 20.041%. This bill would instead set the deficit factor for each county superintendent of schools for the 2011–12 fiscal year at 20.691%. (3) Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to determine a revenue limit for each school district in the county and requires the amount of the revenue limit to be adjusted for various factors. Existing law reduces the revenue limit for each school district for the 2011–12 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 19.754%. This bill would instead set the deficit factor for each school district for the 2011–12 fiscal year at 20.404%. (4) Existing law authorized the Director of Finance to make reductions to certain appropriations in the Budget Act of 2011 if the higher of 2 specified revenue forecasts for the 2011–12 fiscal year was less one or both of 2 specified sums. Pursuant to this provision, the Director of Finance is required to reduce the appropriation for home-to-school transportation and small school district transportation that was included in the Budget Act of 2011 by up to $248,000,000. This bill would make an appropriation of $248,000,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Education, for transfer to Section A of the State School Fund, to restore any funding for home-to-school transportation and small school district transportation for the 2011–12 fiscal year reduced pursuant to this authority. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors SB 81?
SB 81 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 81?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 81?
Track SB 81 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 81

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 81

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →