Budget Act of 2011.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 81 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 81.
You're tracking SB 81
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 81 — Budget Act of 2011.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 2, Statutes of 2012.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, the amount of revenue that a district may collect annually for general purposes, called a revenue limit, is calculated in accordance with various statutory formulas. A basic aid school district is a school district where property tax revenues exceed the revenue limit and the district consequently does not receive a state apportionment. Existing law also expresses legislative intent that basic aid school districts assume categorical funding reductions proportionate to the revenue limit reductions implemented for nonbasic aid school districts in the 2008–09 and 2009–10 fiscal years. Existing law requires calculations to implement the funding reductions, including, in specified circumstances, subtracting an amount determined by multiplying each district's 2011–12 fiscal year total revenue limit, subject to a specified deficit factor and calculated as specified, by 8.92%. This bill would instead require each district's 2011–12 fiscal year total revenue limit to be multiplied by 9.57%. (2) Existing law requires a revenue limit to be calculated for each county superintendent of schools, adjusted for various factors, and reduced, as specified. Existing law reduces the revenue limit for each county superintendent of schools for the 2011–12 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 20.041%. This bill would instead set the deficit factor for each county superintendent of schools for the 2011–12 fiscal year at 20.691%. (3) Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to determine a revenue limit for each school district in the county and requires the amount of the revenue limit to be adjusted for various factors. Existing law reduces the revenue limit for each school district for the 2011–12 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 19.754%. This bill would instead set the deficit factor for each school district for the 2011–12 fiscal year at 20.404%. (4) Existing law authorized the Director of Finance to make reductions to certain appropriations in the Budget Act of 2011 if the higher of 2 specified revenue forecasts for the 2011–12 fiscal year was less one or both of 2 specified sums. Pursuant to this provision, the Director of Finance is required to reduce the appropriation for home-to-school transportation and small school district transportation that was included in the Budget Act of 2011 by up to $248,000,000. This bill would make an appropriation of $248,000,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Education, for transfer to Section A of the State School Fund, to restore any funding for home-to-school transportation and small school district transportation for the 2011–12 fiscal year reduced pursuant to this authority. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 02/10/12 - Chaptered Current pdf February 10, 2012
- Enrolled 02/02/12 - Enrolled pdf February 02, 2012
- Amended 01/30/12 - Amended Assembly pdf January 30, 2012
- Amended 01/19/12 - Amended Assembly pdf January 19, 2012
- Amended 03/14/11 - Amended Assembly pdf March 14, 2011
- Introduced 01/10/11 - Introduced pdf January 10, 2011
- SB81 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 2, Statutes of 2012.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 26. Noes 8. Page 2760.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 2765.)
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 2759.) Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
-
In Senate.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 60. Noes 8. Page 3677.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 20. Noes 5.) (January 31).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 2. Page 167.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 10.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 0% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 59 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 60 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 10% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 20% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 74% | 19% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (27)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 2 | 0 | 13 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 22 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 5% | 0% | 37% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| La Malfa | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 81 do?
- (1) Under existing law, the amount of revenue that a district may collect annually for general purposes, called a revenue limit, is calculated in accordance with various statutory formulas. A basic aid school district is a school district where property tax revenues exceed the revenue limit and the district consequently does not receive a state apportionment. Existing law also expresses legislative intent that basic aid school districts assume categorical funding reductions proportionate to the revenue limit reductions implemented for nonbasic aid school districts in the 2008–09 and 2009–10 fiscal years. Existing law requires calculations to implement the funding reductions, including, in specified circumstances, subtracting an amount determined by multiplying each district's 2011–12 fiscal year total revenue limit, subject to a specified deficit factor and calculated as specified, by 8.92%. This bill would instead require each district's 2011–12 fiscal year total revenue limit to be multiplied by 9.57%. (2) Existing law requires a revenue limit to be calculated for each county superintendent of schools, adjusted for various factors, and reduced, as specified. Existing law reduces the revenue limit for each county superintendent of schools for the 2011–12 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 20.041%. This bill would instead set the deficit factor for each county superintendent of schools for the 2011–12 fiscal year at 20.691%. (3) Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to determine a revenue limit for each school district in the county and requires the amount of the revenue limit to be adjusted for various factors. Existing law reduces the revenue limit for each school district for the 2011–12 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 19.754%. This bill would instead set the deficit factor for each school district for the 2011–12 fiscal year at 20.404%. (4) Existing law authorized the Director of Finance to make reductions to certain appropriations in the Budget Act of 2011 if the higher of 2 specified revenue forecasts for the 2011–12 fiscal year was less one or both of 2 specified sums. Pursuant to this provision, the Director of Finance is required to reduce the appropriation for home-to-school transportation and small school district transportation that was included in the Budget Act of 2011 by up to $248,000,000. This bill would make an appropriation of $248,000,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Education, for transfer to Section A of the State School Fund, to restore any funding for home-to-school transportation and small school district transportation for the 2011–12 fiscal year reduced pursuant to this authority. (5) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Who sponsors SB 81?
- SB 81 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
- What is the current status of SB 81?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 81?
- Track SB 81 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 81
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 81
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →