Pervasive developmental disorder or autism.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 171 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 171.
You're tracking AB 171
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 171 — Pervasive developmental disorder or autism.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for licensing and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care. A willful violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law requires health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies to provide coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of severe mental illnesses, including pervasive developmental disorder or autism, under the same terms and conditions applied to other medical conditions, as specified. Commencing July 1, 2012, and until July 1, 2014, existing law requires health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies to provide coverage for behavioral health treatment, as defined, for pervasive developmental disorder or autism. This bill would require health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies to provide coverage for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment, other than behavioral health treatment, of pervasive developmental disorder or autism. The bill would, however, provide that no benefits are required to be provided that exceed the essential health benefits that will be required under specified federal law. The bill would prohibit health care service plans and health insurers from denying, terminating, or refusing to renew coverage solely because the individual is diagnosed with or has received treatment for pervasive developmental disorder or autism. Because the bill would change the definition of a crime with respect to health care service plans, it would thereby impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 01/23/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf January 23, 2012
- Amended 05/03/11 - Amended Assembly pdf May 03, 2011
- Amended 04/06/11 - Amended Assembly pdf April 06, 2011
- Introduced 01/20/11 - Introduced pdf January 20, 2011
- AB171 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 50. Noes 18. Page 3603.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (January 19).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 6.) (April 26).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Ammiano · Cosponsor
- Beall · Primary
- Blumenfield · Cosponsor
- Brownley · Cosponsor
- Carter · Cosponsor
- Mitchell · Cosponsor
- Chesbro · Cosponsor
- Eng · Cosponsor
- Huffman · Cosponsor
- Swanson · Cosponsor
- Wieckowski · Cosponsor
- Williams · Cosponsor
- Yamada · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 109 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Beall
Co-sponsors (12)
- Ammiano
- Blumenfield
- Brownley
- Carter
- Mitchell
- Chesbro
- Eng
- Huffman
- Swanson
- Wieckowski
- Williams
- Yamada
Not signed on (109)
109 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 109 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 16 | 0 | 12 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 50 | 18 | 0 | 12 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 23% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Gorell | — | Not Voting |
| Halderman | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Valadao | — | Not Voting |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 32% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 171 do?
- (1) Existing law provides for licensing and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care. A willful violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law requires health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies to provide coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of severe mental illnesses, including pervasive developmental disorder or autism, under the same terms and conditions applied to other medical conditions, as specified. Commencing July 1, 2012, and until July 1, 2014, existing law requires health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies to provide coverage for behavioral health treatment, as defined, for pervasive developmental disorder or autism. This bill would require health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies to provide coverage for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment, other than behavioral health treatment, of pervasive developmental disorder or autism. The bill would, however, provide that no benefits are required to be provided that exceed the essential health benefits that will be required under specified federal law. The bill would prohibit health care service plans and health insurers from denying, terminating, or refusing to renew coverage solely because the individual is diagnosed with or has received treatment for pervasive developmental disorder or autism. Because the bill would change the definition of a crime with respect to health care service plans, it would thereby impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 171?
- AB 171 is sponsored by Ammiano, Beall, Blumenfield, Brownley, Carter, Mitchell, Chesbro, Eng, Huffman, Swanson, Wieckowski, Williams, and Yamada.
- What is the current status of AB 171?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 171?
- Track AB 171 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 171
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 171
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →