SB 1285 — Hospital billing: emergency services and care.
Last action — Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of health facilities by the State Department of Public Health and requires a licensed facility that maintains and operates an emergency department to provide emergency services and care to any person requesting the services or care for any condition in which the person is in danger of loss of life or serious injury or illness, as specified. Existing law requires hospitals to maintain a written policy regarding discount payments for financially qualified patients as well as a written charity care policy. Existing law requires a hospital to limit the expected payment for services it provides to certain low-income patients to the highest amount the hospital would expect to receive for providing services from a government-sponsored program of health benefits in which the hospital participates. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law requires health care service plans, or their contracting medical providers, to reimburse providers for emergency services and care provided to their enrollees until the care results in stabilization of the enrollee. This bill would require a hospital with an out-of-network emergency utilization rate, as defined, of 50% or more to adjust its total billed charges for emergency services and care provided to a patient prior to stabilization to an amount no greater than 150% of the amount the hospital could expect to receive from Medicare for the services and care. The bill would specify that this provision does not apply to charges billed by emergency physicians, as defined, or to charges provided as treatment for an injury that is compensable for purposes of workers' compensation. The bill would also specify that its provisions do not apply if any other law requires the hospital to limit expected payment for the emergency services and care to a lesser amount, if a contract governs the total billed charges for the emergency services and care, or if a government program of health benefits, as specified, is the primary payer for the emergency services and care. The bill would require health care service plans or their contracting medical providers to reimburse hospitals in accordance with these provisions. Because a willful violation of that reimbursement requirement by a health care service plan or its contracting medical providers would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/07/12 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 07, 2012
- Amended 06/26/12 - Amended Assembly pdf June 26, 2012
- Amended 06/11/12 - Amended Assembly pdf June 11, 2012
- Amended 05/09/12 - Amended Senate pdf May 09, 2012
- Amended 03/26/12 - Amended Senate pdf March 26, 2012
- Introduced 02/23/12 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2012
- SB1285 View text html
Action History
-
Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 5.) (July 3).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 15. Page 3494.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3445.) (May 7).
-
Set for hearing May 7.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 3306.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 25.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 18.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 25.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hernandez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hernandez
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 74% | 26% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 15 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 38% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Negrete McLeod | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Vargas | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| La Malfa | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1285 do?
- Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of health facilities by the State Department of Public Health and requires a licensed facility that maintains and operates an emergency department to provide emergency services and care to any person requesting the services or care for any condition in which the person is in danger of loss of life or serious injury or illness, as specified. Existing law requires hospitals to maintain a written policy regarding discount payments for financially qualified patients as well as a written charity care policy. Existing law requires a hospital to limit the expected payment for services it provides to certain low-income patients to the highest amount the hospital would expect to receive for providing services from a government-sponsored program of health benefits in which the hospital participates. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law requires health care service plans, or their contracting medical providers, to reimburse providers for emergency services and care provided to their enrollees until the care results in stabilization of the enrollee. This bill would require a hospital with an out-of-network emergency utilization rate, as defined, of 50% or more to adjust its total billed charges for emergency services and care provided to a patient prior to stabilization to an amount no greater than 150% of the amount the hospital could expect to receive from Medicare for the services and care. The bill would specify that this provision does not apply to charges billed by emergency physicians, as defined, or to charges provided as treatment for an injury that is compensable for purposes of workers' compensation. The bill would also specify that its provisions do not apply if any other law requires the hospital to limit expected payment for the emergency services and care to a lesser amount, if a contract governs the total billed charges for the emergency services and care, or if a government program of health benefits, as specified, is the primary payer for the emergency services and care. The bill would require health care service plans or their contracting medical providers to reimburse hospitals in accordance with these provisions. Because a willful violation of that reimbursement requirement by a health care service plan or its contracting medical providers would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 1285?
- SB 1285 is sponsored by Hernandez.
- What is the current status of SB 1285?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1285?
- Track SB 1285 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1285
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1285
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →