California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 643 — Administrative procedures.

Last action — Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires every state agency subject to the Administrative Procedures Act to provide an initial statement of reasons for proposing the adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation. Existing law also requires that the initial statement of reasons include, among other things, facts, evidence, documents, testimony, or other evidence on which the agency relies to support a specified determination. This bill would additionally require that if the proposed regulation impacts housing, the initial statement of reasons include the estimated cost and benefits of compliance and the related assumptions used in determining that estimate. (2) Existing law requires every state agency to provide notice of the proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation and requires a designated agency officer to make publicly available the agency's evaluation, if any, of the effect of the proposed regulatory action on housing costs. The bill would require that in making the evaluation available to the public, the agency officer include the estimated costs and benefits of compliance.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.

  2. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  3. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.

  5. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1190.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 1086.) (May 23).

  9. Set for hearing May 23.

  10. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 856.) (May 2).

  12. Set for hearing May 2.

  13. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.

  14. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 415.) (March 22). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  15. Set for hearing March 22.

  16. Referred to Coms. on G.O. and RLS.

  17. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  18. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Correa · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Correa

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35002
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 38002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Rules.

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9001
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 12001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Evans — Yea
Hernandez — Not Voting
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Wright — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 643 do?
(1) Existing law requires every state agency subject to the Administrative Procedures Act to provide an initial statement of reasons for proposing the adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation. Existing law also requires that the initial statement of reasons include, among other things, facts, evidence, documents, testimony, or other evidence on which the agency relies to support a specified determination. This bill would additionally require that if the proposed regulation impacts housing, the initial statement of reasons include the estimated cost and benefits of compliance and the related assumptions used in determining that estimate. (2) Existing law requires every state agency to provide notice of the proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation and requires a designated agency officer to make publicly available the agency's evaluation, if any, of the effect of the proposed regulatory action on housing costs. The bill would require that in making the evaluation available to the public, the agency officer include the estimated costs and benefits of compliance.
Who sponsors SB 643?
SB 643 is sponsored by Correa.
What is the current status of SB 643?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 643?
Track SB 643 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 643

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 643

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →