California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 2665 — County employees' retirement: Marin County: safety members.

Last action — From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 authorizes counties and districts to establish retirement systems pursuant to its provisions in order to provide pension benefits to employees. The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 authorizes the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo to provide any retirement benefits pursuant to that formula for some, but not all, general members or safety members of the county. Existing law further authorizes that county, by resolution, to require safety members to pay all or part of the contributions by a member or employer, or both, subject to certain limitations and conditions. This bill would authorize the Board of Supervisors of Marin County to provide a service retirement formula known as 3% at age 55 for safety members hired on or after January 1, 2013, as specified. The bill would authorize different retirement benefits pursuant to that formula for different bargaining units of safety members and the unrepresented groups of safety employees in similar job classifications and the supervisors and managers of those employees. The bill would also permit an ordinance or resolution adopted by the board to require safety members to pay part of the contributions by a member or employer, or both. The bill would require that the payment by a safety member become part of the accumulated contributions of the safety member. The bill would authorize the board, by means of a resolution, ordinance, contract, or contract amendment, to make the above-described provisions applicable to safety members in Marin County who are first hired on or after January 1, 2013.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.

  2. Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.

  3. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  4. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 52. Noes 25. Page 5098.)

  5. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  6. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).

  7. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  8. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  9. Referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.

  10. From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

  11. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Huffman

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 2665 P.E., R. & S.S. Assembly Third Reading By FURUTANI

Passed 52 Yea · 25 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 512303
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 522503
% of votes cast 65%31%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Gorell — Nay
Halderman — Nay
Fong — Yea
Butler — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Carter — Yea
Allen — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hall — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Not Voting
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Lara — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Pan — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Not Voting
Wagner — Nay
Williams — Yea
Fletcher — Not Voting
Achadjian — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huber — Yea
Knight — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Norby — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2665 do?
The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 authorizes counties and districts to establish retirement systems pursuant to its provisions in order to provide pension benefits to employees. The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 authorizes the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo to provide any retirement benefits pursuant to that formula for some, but not all, general members or safety members of the county. Existing law further authorizes that county, by resolution, to require safety members to pay all or part of the contributions by a member or employer, or both, subject to certain limitations and conditions. This bill would authorize the Board of Supervisors of Marin County to provide a service retirement formula known as 3% at age 55 for safety members hired on or after January 1, 2013, as specified. The bill would authorize different retirement benefits pursuant to that formula for different bargaining units of safety members and the unrepresented groups of safety employees in similar job classifications and the supervisors and managers of those employees. The bill would also permit an ordinance or resolution adopted by the board to require safety members to pay part of the contributions by a member or employer, or both. The bill would require that the payment by a safety member become part of the accumulated contributions of the safety member. The bill would authorize the board, by means of a resolution, ordinance, contract, or contract amendment, to make the above-described provisions applicable to safety members in Marin County who are first hired on or after January 1, 2013.
Who sponsors AB 2665?
AB 2665 is sponsored by Huffman and Travis Allen.
What is the current status of AB 2665?
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2665?
Track AB 2665 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2665

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2665

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →