California 2011-2012 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 94 — Criminal justice realignment.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 23, Statutes of 2011.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) , participating counties, and the State Public Works Board (SPWB) to acquire, design, and construct local jail facilities approved by the Corrections Standards Authority (CSA) . Existing law authorizes the SPWB to issue revenue bonds, notes, or bond anticipation notes in specified amounts to finance the acquisition, design, or construction, and a reasonable construction reserve, of approved local jail facilities, as specified. Existing law requires a minimum of 25% in county matching funds for projects funded under these provisions and requires the CDCR and CSA to give funding preference to counties that assist the state in siting reentry facilities, as specified. AB 111 of the 2011–12 Regular Session, if it becomes operative, instead requires that the CDCR and the CSA give funding preference to counties that committed the largest percentage of inmates to state custody in relation to the total inmate population of CDCR in 2010. This bill would, if AB 111 of the 2011–12 Regular Session becomes operative, authorize counties that have received a conditional award under one specified jail facilities financing program to relinquish that award and reapply for a conditional award under a separate financing program, as specified. The bill would lower to 10% the required county contribution and additionally require the CDCR and CSA to give funding preference to those counties that relinquish those specified local jail construction conditional awards and agree to continue to assist the state in siting reentry facilities, as specified. The bill would cap at $100,000,000 the amount a county may receive in proceeds from SPWB's issuance of bonds, notes, or bond anticipation notes under those specified provisions. This bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the CDCR for purposes of state operations to be used by the CSA in the 2011–12 fiscal year. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 23, Statutes of 2011.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 48. Noes 16. Page 1123.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after April 13 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 22. Noes 9. Page 598.).

  7. Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 597.)

  8. Ordered to third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (April 11).

  10. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Ayes 23. Noes 14. Page 595.)

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  12. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  13. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  14. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (March 16).

  16. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  19. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  20. Ordered to second reading.

  21. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  22. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 0. Page 414.)

  23. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  24. Without reference to committee.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.

  26. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 94 BUDGET Concurrence in Senate Amendments By BLUMENFIELD

Passed 48 Yea · 16 Nay · 15 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4515014
Democratic 3000
Republican 0101
Total 4816015
% of votes cast 61%20%0%19%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
Butler — Yea
Campos — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Carter — Not Voting
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Not Voting
Garrick — Nay
Gordon — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hill — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lara — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Not Voting
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Not Voting
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Portantino — Not Voting
Yamada — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Morrell — Nay
Norby — Not Voting
Olsen — Not Voting
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Not Voting
Wagner — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Yea
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 10 Yea · 4 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10402
Total 10402
% of votes cast 63%25%0%13%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Leno — Yea
Wolk — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Huff — Nay
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
La Malfa — Nay

Official roll call →

W/O REF. TO FILE AB94 Committee on BUDGET (Blumenfield) By Leno

Passed 22 Yea · 9 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 21808
Republican 0100
Democratic 1001
Total 22909
% of votes cast 55%23%0%23%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Simitian — Yea
De León — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cannella — Not Voting
Negrete McLeod — Not Voting
Fuller — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Harman — Nay
Huff — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Leno — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Lieu — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 10 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10501
Total 10501
% of votes cast 63%31%0%6%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Rubio — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Huff — Nay
Leno — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Liu — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
La Malfa — Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 10 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10501
Total 10501
% of votes cast 63%31%0%6%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Rubio — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Liu — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Leno — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
La Malfa — Nay

Official roll call →

AB 94 BUDGET Assembly Third Reading By BLUMENFIELD

Passed 49 Yea · 0 Nay · 30 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 0002
Unaffiliated 460028
Democratic 3000
Total 490030
% of votes cast 62%0%0%38%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hill — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Perea — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Not Voting
Butler — Not Voting
Gordon — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Hagman — Not Voting
Halderman — Not Voting
Harkey — Not Voting
Fletcher — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Campos — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Not Voting
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Not Voting
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Miller — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Not Voting
Nestande — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Olsen — Not Voting
Pan — Yea
Silva — Not Voting
Smyth — Not Voting
Swanson — Not Voting
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Not Voting
Wagner — Not Voting
Achadjian — Not Voting
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Logue — Not Voting
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Not Voting
Norby — Not Voting
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Bonnie Lowenthal — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 94 do?
Existing law authorizes the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) , participating counties, and the State Public Works Board (SPWB) to acquire, design, and construct local jail facilities approved by the Corrections Standards Authority (CSA) . Existing law authorizes the SPWB to issue revenue bonds, notes, or bond anticipation notes in specified amounts to finance the acquisition, design, or construction, and a reasonable construction reserve, of approved local jail facilities, as specified. Existing law requires a minimum of 25% in county matching funds for projects funded under these provisions and requires the CDCR and CSA to give funding preference to counties that assist the state in siting reentry facilities, as specified. AB 111 of the 2011–12 Regular Session, if it becomes operative, instead requires that the CDCR and the CSA give funding preference to counties that committed the largest percentage of inmates to state custody in relation to the total inmate population of CDCR in 2010. This bill would, if AB 111 of the 2011–12 Regular Session becomes operative, authorize counties that have received a conditional award under one specified jail facilities financing program to relinquish that award and reapply for a conditional award under a separate financing program, as specified. The bill would lower to 10% the required county contribution and additionally require the CDCR and CSA to give funding preference to those counties that relinquish those specified local jail construction conditional awards and agree to continue to assist the state in siting reentry facilities, as specified. The bill would cap at $100,000,000 the amount a county may receive in proceeds from SPWB's issuance of bonds, notes, or bond anticipation notes under those specified provisions. This bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the CDCR for purposes of state operations to be used by the CSA in the 2011–12 fiscal year. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 94?
AB 94 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 94?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 94?
Track AB 94 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 94

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 94

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →