Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act: Brady lists.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2543 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2543.
You're tracking AB 2543
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2543 — Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act: Brady lists.
Last action — In committee: Set final hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act prohibits any punitive action against a public safety officer, or denial of promotion on grounds other than merit, without providing the public safety officer with an opportunity for administrative appeal. This bill would prohibit a public agency from taking punitive action against a public safety officer, or denying promotion on grounds other than merit, because that officer's name is placed on a Brady list, as defined. The bill would provide, however, that the public agency may take punitive or personnel action against a public safety officer based on the underlying acts or omissions for which that officer's name was placed on the Brady list, as specified. The bill would prohibit the introduction of any evidence that an officer's name was placed on a Brady list in any administrative appeal of a punitive action or civil proceeding between the officer and an office or public agency, except as provided. The bill would permit evidence that a public safety officer's name was placed on a Brady list to be introduced if, during the administrative appeal of a punitive action against an officer, the underlying act or omission for which that officer's name was placed on a Brady list is proven and the officer is found to be subject to some form of punitive action. The bill would provide that evidence introduced pursuant to the above-described provisions shall only be used for the sole purpose of determining the type or level of punitive action to be imposed.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/11/12 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 11, 2012
- Amended 03/29/12 - Amended Assembly pdf March 29, 2012
- Introduced 02/24/12 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2012
- AB2543 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set final hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 4910.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (May 8).
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Alejo · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Alejo
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 43% | 29% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Nay |
| Steinberg | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gorell | — | Yea |
| Halderman | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Butler | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Valadao | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mansoor | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bonnie Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2543 do?
- The Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act prohibits any punitive action against a public safety officer, or denial of promotion on grounds other than merit, without providing the public safety officer with an opportunity for administrative appeal. This bill would prohibit a public agency from taking punitive action against a public safety officer, or denying promotion on grounds other than merit, because that officer's name is placed on a Brady list, as defined. The bill would provide, however, that the public agency may take punitive or personnel action against a public safety officer based on the underlying acts or omissions for which that officer's name was placed on the Brady list, as specified. The bill would prohibit the introduction of any evidence that an officer's name was placed on a Brady list in any administrative appeal of a punitive action or civil proceeding between the officer and an office or public agency, except as provided. The bill would permit evidence that a public safety officer's name was placed on a Brady list to be introduced if, during the administrative appeal of a punitive action against an officer, the underlying act or omission for which that officer's name was placed on a Brady list is proven and the officer is found to be subject to some form of punitive action. The bill would provide that evidence introduced pursuant to the above-described provisions shall only be used for the sole purpose of determining the type or level of punitive action to be imposed.
- Who sponsors AB 2543?
- AB 2543 is sponsored by Alejo.
- What is the current status of AB 2543?
- This bill died with 2011-2012 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2543?
- Track AB 2543 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2543
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2543
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →